Implementing 'Transforming Care' - The first two years of a pilot service for autistic adults experiencing mental health crisis warranting psychiatric admission.

BACKGROUND: Autistic adults are at increased risk of mental health difficulties; however Adult Mental Health Services (AMHS) often struggle to offer appropriate support to this group. Within England, Government initiatives, such as the 'Transforming Care' programme which included 'Building the Right Support' (NHS England, 2015) have promoted the need for AMHS to consider how they can better provide autism-informed support to autistic adults. AIMS/METHODS: Here, we describe the first two years of work of the Transforming Care in Autism (TCA) Team; a specialist service that supports autistic adults, without a moderate or severe intellectual disability or presenting significant risk to others, experiencing a mental health crisis. The service model is described, and descriptive data is presented over the two years of the service operation. RESULTS: Between February 2019 and February 2021, 110 referrals were received; 52 (47%) were accepted. Support offered to autistic adults included psychoeducation, psychological interventions, family-focused interventions, and consultation with professionals about specific individuals. Seventy autism training sessions were delivered to professionals working in medical health settings, AMHS, social care and residential services. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Developing more autism-informed community and inpatient AMHS is vital for improving care. Further research about the experiences and needs of autistic adults using AMHS is needed, along with improved awareness of autism and provision of tailored intervention within these settings. LAY ABSTRACT: Autistic people have mental health problems more often than people who are not autistic. When autistic people need help from mental health services, often these services do not know how to help autistic people. The Government says mental health services must do more to help autistic people. In this paper we write about a new team, called the Transforming Care in Autism team. In its first two years the team was asked to help 110 people and worked with 52 of them. Help included talking to autistic people about how autism affects them and offering therapy. We also worked with families and professionals supporting autistic adults and offered 70 training sessions. More work is needed to make sure mental health services work well with autistic people. We also need to ask autistic people about their experiences of getting help from mental health services.

Molehill Mountain feasibility study: Protocol for a non-randomised pilot trial of a novel app-based anxiety intervention for autistic people.

Up to 50% of autistic people experience co-occurring anxiety, which significantly impacts their quality of life. Consequently, developing new interventions (and/ or adapting existing ones) that improve anxiety has been indicated as a priority for clinical research and practice by the autistic community. Despite this, there are very few effective, evidence-based therapies available to autistic people that target anxiety; and those that are available (e.g., autism adapted Cognitive Behavioural Therapy; CBT) can be challenging to access. Thus, the current study will provide an early-stage proof of concept for the feasibility and acceptability of a novel app-based therapeutic approach that has been developed with, and adapted for, autistic people to support them in managing anxiety using UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended adapted CBT approaches. This paper describes the design and methodology of an ethically approved (22/LO/0291) ongoing non-randomised pilot trial that aims to enrol approximately 100 participants aged ≥16-years with an existing autism diagnosis and mild-to-severe self-reported anxiety symptoms (trial registration NCT05302167). Participants will be invited to engage with a self-guided app-based intervention-'Molehill Mountain'. Primary (Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and secondary outcomes (medication/ service use and Goal Attainment Scaling) will be assessed at baseline (Week 2 +/- 2), endpoint (Week 15 +/- 2) and three follow-ups (Weeks 24, 32 and 41 +/- 4). Participants will also be invited to complete an app acceptability survey/ interview at the study endpoint. Analyses will address: 1) app acceptability/ useability and feasibility (via survey/ interview and app usage data); and 2) target population, performance of outcome measures and ideal timing/ duration of intervention (via primary/ secondary outcome measures and survey/ interview)-with both objectives further informed by a dedicated stakeholder advisory group. The evidence from this study will inform the future optimisation and implementation of Molehill Mountain in a randomised-controlled trial, to provide a novel tool that can be accessed easily by autistic adults and may improve mental health outcomes.

'Standing up for Myself' (STORM): Development and qualitative evaluation of a psychosocial group intervention designed to increase the capacity of people with intellectual disabilities to manage and resist stigma.

BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disabilities are at risk of experiencing stigma and require the skills and confidence to deal with stigma in their daily lives. METHOD: Development and piloting of a 5-session manualised psychosocial group intervention designed to increase the capacity of people with intellectual disabilities aged 16+ to manage and resist stigma. Ten pre-existing groups (N = 67) in third sector and education settings participated. Interviews with participants (n = 26), facilitators (n = 9) and significant others (n = 7) 2-4 months after the intervention assessed perceived impact. RESULTS: Perceived benefits of the intervention for participants included increased understanding, improved connections with others, drive for advocacy, increased activity and self-efficacy, and opportunity to process difficult events and emotions. Differential impact depending on individuals' pre-existing self-advocacy skills was noted. CONCLUSIONS: This early-stage study indicates that further evaluation is merited to examine feasibility and outcomes of the STORM intervention.