Influence of sludge layer properties on the hydraulic behaviour of gravel-based vertical flow constructed wetlands for primary treatment of sewage.

Sludge accumulation on the first stage of French design vertical flow constructed wetlands has been reported to improve treatment performance by favouring even sewage distribution on the beds' surface and increasing water retention time. However, due to its relatively low permeability, sludge layer can restrict the hydraulic capacity of the wetlands, requiring careful consideration of the feeding and resting strategy in order to avoid system ponding. This study aimed to elucidate the impact that sludge layer properties have on its permeability and investigate artificial modifications that could enhance it. A positive impact of increased organic matter content on sludge permeability was observed, with a 3-times permeability increase for a 15 percentage points higher volatile solids content. The opposite effect was observed for total solids, where an increase of 19 percentage points led to a drop of 1.6 × 10-16 m2 on permeability. The impact of different surface modifications on drying kinetics and sludge layer properties was studied as a means to accelerate sludge layer mineralisation. Artificial modifications that modify surface tension of the sludge layer have been proved to achieve greater permeability and faster mineralisation of the sludge, with potential to achieve higher hydraulic acceptance and reduced operational costs (lower sludge accumulation) if implemented in full scale vertical flow constructed wetlands.

Assessment of activated sludge, membrane bioreactors and vertical flow wetlands for upgrading sewage treatment works.

This paper demonstrates that utilising a vertical flow (VF) wetland after a conventional activated sludge (CAS) delivers equivalent or better effluent quality to a membrane bioreactor (MBR) based on a side-by-side pilot trial. The CAS was operated under the solids retention times (SRT) of 6, 12, and 20 days, with the effluent from each pilot plant fed onto a soil aquifer treatment column to better understand their water reuse application potential. Results showed an upgraded CAS + VF system could deliver effluents with median values of 34 mgO2.L-1, 7 mg.L-1 and 1.9 mg.L-1 for organics, solids and ammonia nitrogen, respectively, which were statistically similar to those from the MBR. Water reuse standards were achieved by the upgraded system for most parameters, with the exception of total coliform removal. The upgraded system delivered superior metal removal when compared to the CAS. An economic analysis showed upgrading a CAS with a VF wetland was more favourable than investing in an MBR system for example works of 5000 and 50,000 population equivalents if the VF system was operated at hydraulic loading rates of 0.03 m.d-1 and 0.08 m.d-1, respectively. This was delivered for a tenth of the carbon footprint of the MBR treatment.

Removal of phosphorus from trickling filter effluent by electrocoagulation.

As regulatory requirements for contaminants in wastewater discharged to the environment get stricter, alternative or additional treatment processes to those already being used are necessary. One contaminant of particular concern associated with discharging treated municipal wastewater to a receiving water body is phosphorus (P). A continuous scale electrocoagulation (EC) system was investigated as an alternative to conventional chemical addition for P removal from municipal wastewater. The EC process was optimized for iron dose delivery by changing the electrical current, electrode spacing and the reactor contact time, and a comparison was made with conventional ferric dosing through jar testing. Results showed that EC could achieve P removal to meet a P consent of 1 mg L⁻¹ at a dose of 154 mg L⁻¹ Fe. The process was shown to provide a supplementary benefit for chemical and biological oxygen demand removal of 86% and 82%, respectively, but gave no significant removal of other sanitary pollutants. When compared directly with conventional iron dosing, EC required approximately twice the iron dose. When electrical costs were also factored into the comparison, EC was shown to be approximately double the cost of conventional dosing and at present is not a feasible alternative to conventional coagulation using ferric chloride.