ABSTRACT
Purpose/Objectives: Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is increasingly used in a variety of adult cancers. To date, published experience regarding the use of MRgRT in pediatric patients is limited to two case reports. We report on the use of MRgRT for pediatric patients at our institution during a four-year period and describe important considerations in the selection and application of this technology in children. Materials/Methods: All patients treated with MRgRT since inception at our institution between 4/2018 and 4/2022 were retrospectively reviewed. We also evaluated all pediatric patients treated at our institution during the same period who received either imaging or treatment using our magnetic resonance-guided linear accelerator (MR Linac). We summarize four clinical cases where MRgRT was selected for treatment in our clinic, including disease outcomes and toxicities and describe our experience using the MR Linac for imaging before and during treatment for image fusion and tumor assessments. Results: Between 4/2018 and 4/2022, 535 patients received MRgRT at our center, including 405 (75.7%) with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). During this period, 347 distinct radiotherapy courses were delivered to pediatric patients, including 217 (62.5%) with proton therapy. Four pediatric patients received MRgRT. One received SABR for lung metastasis with daily adaptive replanning and a second was treated for liver metastasis using a non-adaptive workflow. Two patients received fractionated MRgRT for an ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer and neuroblastoma. No Grade 2 or higher toxicities were observed or reported during MRgRT or subsequent follow-up. Twelve patients underwent MR imaging without contrast during treatment for brain tumors to assess for tumor/cystic changes. Two patients treated with other modalities underwent MR simulation for target volume delineation and organ at risk sparing due to anatomic changes during treatment or unexpected delays in obtaining diagnostic MR appointments. Conclusions: In four pediatric patients treated with MRgRT, treatment was well tolerated with no severe acute effects. At our center, most pediatric patients are treated with proton therapy, but the cases selected for MRgRT demonstrated significant organ at risk sparing compared to alternative modalities. In particular, MRgRT may provide advantages for thoracic/abdominal/pelvic targets using gated delivery and adaptive replanning, but selected patients treated with fractionated radiotherapy may also benefit MRgRT through superior organ at risk sparing.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic MR-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) has demonstrated a superior radiotherapeutic ratio for pancreatic patients, by enabling dose escalation while minimizing the dose to the proximal gastrointestinal organs at risk through online adaptive radiotherapy. The safe delivery of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is of particular importance in the reirradiation setting and has been historically limited to CT-based nonadaptive modalities. Herein, we report the first use of online adaptive radiotherapy in the reirradiation setting, specifically for treatment of locally recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma through SMART reirradiation (SMART reRT). CASE DESCRIPTION: We describe the treatment of a 68-year-old male who was diagnosed with, unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Initial treatment included FOLFIRINOX followed by 45 Gy in 25 fractions on a helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) device with concurrent capecitabine, followed by a boost of 14.4 Gy in 8 fractions to a on an MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) linac. At approximately 12 months from initial radiotherapy, the patient experienced local progression of the pancreas body/tail and therefore SMART reRT of 50 Gy in 5 fractions was initiated. The technical considerations of cumulative dose for gastrointestinal organs across multiple courses, treatment planning principles, and adaptive radiotherapy details are outlined in this case study. The patient tolerated treatment well with minimal fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic ratio of reirradiation may be improved using daily MR guidance with online adaptive replanning, especially for lesions in proximity to critical structures. Future studies are warranted to assess long-term outcomes of dose escalated MR-guided reRT, define OAR dose constraints for reRT, and assess cumulative dose across the adapted SMART reRT fractions and the original RT plan.
