Clinical Evaluation of Femoral Head Fractures: Which Classification Systems Have the Best Universality, Reliability, and Reproducibility?

BACKGROUND: Femoral head fractures are rare but potentially disabling injuries, and classifying them accurately and consistently can help surgeons make good choices about their treatment. However, there is no consensus as to which classification of these fractures is the most advantageous; parameters that might inform this choice include universality (the proportion of fractures that can be classified), as well as, of course, interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Which classification achieves the best universality (defined as the proportion of fractures that can be classified)? (2) Which classification delivers the highest intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the clinical CT assessment of femoral head fractures? (3) Based on the answers to those two questions, which classifications are the most applicable for clinical practice and research? METHODS: Between January 2011 and January 2023, 254 patients with femoral head fractures who had CT scans (CT is routine at our institution for patients who have experienced severe hip trauma) were potentially eligible for inclusion in this study, which was performed at a large Level I trauma center in China. Of those, 9% (23 patients) were excluded because of poor-quality CT images, unclosed physes, pathologic fractures, or acetabular dysplasia, leaving 91% (231 patients with 231 hips) for analysis here. Among those, 19% (45) were female. At the time of injury, the mean age was 40 ± 17 years. All fractures were independently classified by four observers according to the Pipkin, Brumback, AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA), Chiron, and New classifications. Each observer repeated his classifications again 1 month later to allow us to ascertain intraobserver reliability. To evaluate the universality of classifications, we characterized the percentage of hips that could be classified using the definitions offered in each classification. The kappa (κ) value was calculated to determine interrater and intrarater agreement. We then compared the classifications based on the combination of universality and interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility to determine which classifications might be recommended for clinical and research use. RESULTS: The universalities of the classifications were 99% (228 of 231, Pipkin), 43% (99 of 231, Brumback), 94% (216 of 231, AO/OTA), 99% (228 of 231, Chiron), and 100% (231 of 231, New). The interrater agreement was judged as almost perfect (κ 0.81 [95% CI 0.78 to 0.84], Pipkin), moderate (κ 0.51 [95% CI 0.44 to 0.59], Brumback), fair (κ 0.28 [95% CI 0.18 to 0.38], AO/OTA), substantial (κ 0.79 [95% CI 0.76 to 0.82], Chiron), and substantial (κ 0.63 [95% CI 0.58 to 0.68], New). In addition, the intrarater agreement was judged as almost perfect (κ 0.89 [95% CI 0.83 to 0.96]), substantial (κ 0.72 [95% CI 0.69 to 0.75]), moderate (κ 0.51 [95% CI 0.43 to 0.58]), almost perfect (κ 0.87 [95% CI 0.82 to 0.91]), and substantial (κ 0.78 [95% CI 0.59 to 0.97]), respectively. Based on these findings, we determined that the Pipkin and Chiron classifications offer near-complete universality and sufficient interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility to recommend them for clinical and research use, but the other classifications (Brumback, AO/OTA, and New) do not. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, clinicians and clinician-scientists can use either the Pipkin or Chiron classification systems to classify femoral head fractures based on CT images, with equal confidence. It seems unlikely that any new classifications will substantially outperform these, and the other available systems either lacked sufficient universality or reproducibility to recommend them for general use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

[Surgical treatment for ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fracture].

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze efficacy of single structure internal fixation and double structure internal fixation in the treatment of ipsilateral femoral shaft and neck fracture, and analyze their indications. METHODS: From June 2015 to December 2020, 21 patients with ipsilateral femoral shaft and femoral neck fracture were treated, including 14 males and 7 females, aged 23 to 69 years old with an average of(38.1±12.9) years old. According to different femoral shaft fracture sites, some patients were fixed with cephalomedullary implant for both femoral neck and the femoral shaft(single structure, InterTan or PFNA Ⅱ), some patients were fixed with cannulated screws for the femoral neck and a retrograde locking nail for the femoral shaft (dual structure), and postoperative function and complications were recorded during follow-up. In 10 cases of single-structure fixation, the femoral necks were all basicervical fractures, and the femoral shaft fractures were located in the proximal isthmus;11 cases were double-structure fixation, 9 cases in 11 were basal type of femoral neck, 2 cases in 11 were neck type, and the femoral shaft fractures were located in the isthmus and the distal isthmus. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 12 to 27 months. No femoral head necrosis, deformity, delay or nonunion occurred in the patients with single-structure fixation, and no delayed union or nonunion occurred in femoral shaft fractures;At the final follow-up, Harris score of patients with single-structure fixation was 91.8±4.1, with 8 cases were excellent and 2 cases were good. The fractures of patients with dual-structure fixation achieved good union without femoral head necrosis, except 1 case of femoral shaft fracture had delayed union;At the final follow-up, Harris score of patients with dual-structure fixation was 92.4±5.9, 7 cases were excellent, 3 cases were good, and 1 case was fair. CONCLUSION: Good reduction and fixation is the key to the treatment of such fractures. Both the single-structure fixation and the dual-structure fixation are good methods, and it should be selected according to the locations of femoral shaft and femoral neck fractures. Single-structure fixation is a good choice for femoral shaft fractures located at the proximal isthmus and basal femoral neck fractures. For isthmus and distal femoral shaft fractures combined with ipsilateral femoral neck fractures, dual-structure fixation is recommended.

Finite element analysis of necessity of reduction and selection of internal fixation for valgus-impacted femoral neck fracture.

This study compared the biomechanical characteristics of different treatment strategies based on finite element analysis. Posterior tilt and valgus angle were measured on X-ray from ten valgus-impacted femoral neck fractures, and 7 finite element models that were generated to compare the stress and displacement. The results showed that in the intact femur, von Mises stress was concentrated at the medial and inferior sides of the femoral neck. In valgus-impacted femoral neck fractures, von Mises stress was at the same locations but was 5.66 times higher than that in the intact femur. When 3 cannulated screws were used for internal fixation, anatomic reduction diminished the stress at the fracture end from 140.6 to 59.14 MPa, although displacement increased from 0.228 to 0.450 mm. When the fracture was fixed with a sliding hip screw (SHS) + cannulated screw, there was less stress at the fracture end and greater displacement with anatomic reduction than that without reduction (stress: 15.9 vs 37.9 MPa; displacement: 0.329 vs 0.168 mm). Therefore, the SHS + cannulated screw has superior biomechanical stability than 3 cannulated screws, and is recommended following anatomic reduction to treat valgus-compacted femoral neck fractures.

Fracture morphology and biomechanical characteristics of Pauwels III femoral neck fractures in young adults.

BACKGROUND: Pauwels classification, which categorizes types of femoral neck fractures, cannot fully reflect the three-dimensional characteristics of this injury. The purpose of our study was to determine the morphological characteristics of Pauwels III fractures through computed tomography image analysis and summarize the relevant biomechanical characteristics of different morphological fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a total of 209 patients diagnosed with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures. Fracture reduction was simulated based on mirror symmetry of the bilateral femur by Mimics. The fracture angle was measured and subtypes were defined. Biomechanical characteristics were compared by finite element analysis and validated using a biomechanical experiment, which was performed on a cadaveric sample. RESULTS: Pauwels III femoral neck fractures can be divided into three subtypes: anterior, posterior, and classical. The proportion of three subtypes was 28.71%, 67.46%, and 3.82%, respectively. The anterior subtype showed the lowest axial stiffness but highest implant and bone stress. High stress distributions was concentrated on the screw-bone interface and screw-plate connections. CONCLUSIONS: Biomechanical differences across the three subtypes of Pauwels III femoral neck fractures could increase our understanding of the biomechanical characteristics that underlie the Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures (such as, three-dimensional morphology and the stress distribution of bone and implant) that have been associated with high failure rates.

Biomechanical and finite element study of drilling sites for benign lesions in femoral head and neck with curettage, bone-grafting and internal fixation.

Objective: To evaluate the influence of drilling sites for benign lesions in femoral head and neck with curettage, bone-grafting and internal fixation. Methods: Twelve paired formalin-fixed human cadaveric femora were grouped randomly into 2 groups of 6 pairs each, which were group 1 and group 2, and one of each pair of femora was grouped randomly to drill an oval-shaped hole in the anterior femoral neck, and the contralateral femur was assigned to drill an oval-shaped hole in the lateral of the proximal femur. Group 1 femora were simulated the operation of curettage, bone-grafting and internal fixation, and group 2 femora were simulated the operation of curettage. Besides, finite element models corresponding to mechanical testing were simulated according to one of the twelve femora, then finite element analysis were done. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis, with a p value < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Results: The simulated operation of curettage decreased the axial stiffness and torsional stiffness of the intact proximal femur significantly, while there was no statistical difference on the degree of the decline between different drilling sites. Although the simulated operation of bone-grafting and internal fixation in different drilling sites increased the axial stiffness and torsional stiffness, only in the case of implanting bones and internal fixation for the lateral cortical drilled hole increased the axial stiffness greatly and made a statistical difference, even more stiff than the intact proximal femur model. Conclusion: Compared with drilling in the anterior femoral neck, a bigger stability could be obtained after drilling in the lateral proximal femur for benign lesions in femoral head and neck with curettage, bone-grafting and internal fixation.

Histological Observation of the Retinacula of Weitbrecht and Its Clinical Significance: A cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: The retinacular arteries provide major supply to the femoral head, their injuries may lead to the femoral head necrosis (FHN) in femoral neck fractures. Although the femoral neck fracture was seriously displaced in some patients, FHN did not occur, which suggests that the blood supply is not fully blocked. This study was aimed to find the association between the structure of the retinacula of Weitbrecht and the mechanism of protecting retinacular arteries from being injured. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen formalin-fixed cadaveric specimens (in 28 hips) with no significant vascular disease were observed. The retinacula were cut longitudinally and then cut into three parts: medial, middle, and lateral. These specimens were stained using hematoxylin and eosin and improved Masson Trichrome stain. The microstructure and tightness of the retinacula fixed to the bone and the distribution of vessels were examined under a stereoscope, an optical microscope, and a scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: The microstructure and compactness in each part of retinacula were different, and the tightness of the fibers of the retinacula fixed to the bone in each part were different. A particular structure which resembled a Sandwich panels was observed, and it may be an effective mechanism of protecting retinacular arteries. CONCLUSION: The Sandwich panels structure existed generally in the retinacula of Weitbrecht, and this sandwich panelture may play very important role in protecting the retinaculum artery from being injured, which show the importance of protecting the retinacular artery in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.

Overexpression of stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells enhance the expression of induced endothelial cells.

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) are capable of differentiating into endothelial cells in vitro and acquire major characteristics of mature endothelial-like expression of vWF and CD31. SFAs and lipid oxidation products have been linked with postprandial endothelial dysfunction. Consumption of SFAs impairs arterial endothelial function, while a Mediterranean-type MUFA-diet has a beneficial effect on endothelial function by producing a decrease in levels of vWF, TFPI and PAI-1. Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1), which converts SFA to MUFA, is involved in the cellular biosynthesis of MUFAs from SFA substrates. High expression of SCD1 is corresponded with low rates of fatty acid oxidation, therefore it might reduce inflammatory responses and be beneficial for the growth of induced endothelial cells. Overexpression of SCD1 in BM-MSCs might increase the growth of induced endothelial cells. The goal of this research is to study the relationship between overexpression of SCD1 and the expression of induced endothelial cells in BM-MSCs in vitro. METHODS: The gene SCD1 was integrated into a lentiviral vector, and then 293 T cells were transfected by the connected product to produce a packaged virus. BM-MSCs were infected by the packaged virus. Cell culture and endothelial induction were performed. Fluorescent quantitative PCR of CD31, vWF and VE-cad was performed after 1 week and 2 weeks to test the growth of induced endothelial cells. RESULTS: The mRNA amount of CD31, vWF and VE-cad of the SCD1 overexpressed group was statistically higher than that of the empty vector (EV) group and that of the normal group after 1 week and 2 weeks, respectively (p < 0.05). Immunocytochemical staining of CD31 or vWF was detected by visualizing red color. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that overexpression of SCD1 in BM-MSCs could increase the expression of induced endothelial cells in vitro.