ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to investigate the mechanism of midazolam in inhibiting the proliferation of hypopharyngeal squamous carcinoma cells. Cultured FaDu cancer cells were treated with different concentrations of midazolam. MTT and BrdU incorporation assays were then used to evaluate cancer cell proliferation. The mRNA and protein levels of p300, a key factor involved in the tumorigenesis of numerous cancers, were measured with RT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively. Midazolam inhibited the expression of p300 and the proliferation of FaDu cells. Additionally, knockdown of p300 resulted in increased expression of p21 and p27 and decreased expression of p-Rb while inhibiting the proliferation of FaDu cells. Midazolam inhibits the proliferation of human head and neck squamous carcinoma cells by downregulating p300. Midazolam may be useful for the treatment of hypopharyngeal squamous cancers.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , E1A-Associated p300 Protein/physiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Hypopharyngeal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Midazolam/pharmacology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Down-Regulation , E1A-Associated p300 Protein/antagonists & inhibitors , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Hypopharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Retinoblastoma Protein/physiology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Tumor Cells, CulturedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate of the role of transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential (TES-MEP) in combination with cortical somatosensory evoked potential (CSEP) monitoring during the spinal surgery. METHODS: TES-MEP on bilateral anterior tibial muscle and flexor hallucal brevis and CSEP on bilateral posterior tibial nerve were observed simultaneously on 293 patients during spinal surgery from July 2006 to April 2009. Intravenous anesthesia was employed in all the patients, a part of which were added low dose of sevoflurane or muscle relaxant. The results of TES-MEP, CSEP and combined monitoring were analyzed statistically. Pre-operative and post-operative motor and sensory functions of spinal cord were compared. RESULTS: Success rate of TES-MEP, CSEP and combined monitoring was 90.8%, 96.9% and 100% respectively. For the judgment of motor function of spinal cord, the sensitivity of TES-MEP and CSEP was 100% and 89.3% respectively and the specificity of 98.4% and 96.9%. The Youden index of the two methods was 0.984 and 0.862. For sensory function, the sensitivity of them was 76.7% and 93.3% respectively and the specificity of 98.7% and 98.0%. The Youden index was 0.754 and 0.913. The sensitivity of combined monitoring was 100%, with the specificity of 96.9%. The Youden index was 0.969. CONCLUSIONS: The precision of monitoring motor function of spinal cord with TES-MEP is higher than that with CSEP, however, for sensory function, CSEP is more precise. The sensitivity and precision of combined monitoring for spinal cord function were apparently better than that of unitary TES-MEP or CSEP. The combined TES-MEP and CSEP monitoring is a relatively ideal method.
