Continuing metformin when starting insulin in patients with Type 2 diabetes: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial.

AIMS: To test the effect of continuing metformin on weight gain and glycaemic control in patients with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes who need to start insulin. METHODS: Patients with Type 2 diabetes on maximum tolerated oral agents referred for insulin conversion were recruited from hospital diabetes clinics into a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. The 183 participants received metformin or placebo, titrated up to 2 g a day or maximum tolerated dose, with insulin started according to local practice. The main outcome measures were weight change over 12 months, HbA1c, insulin dose, frequency of hypoglycaemia, treatment satisfaction, and well-being. RESULTS: Over 12 months, metformin was associated with less weight gain than placebo [mean 6.1 kg vs. 7.6 kg; adjusted difference 1.5 kg (95% confidence interval 0.2-2.9); P=0.02], a greater reduction in HbA1c[1.5% vs. 1.3%; adjusted difference 0.5% (0.1-0.9); P=0.02] and a lower insulin requirement [62 units vs. 86; adjusted difference 25 units (15-34); P<0.001], but also more hypoglycaemia [relative risk of any episode 1.24 (1.02-1.1); P=0.03]. Treatment satisfaction improved more in patients on metformin than on placebo (P<0.001), as did the positive well-being score (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Metformin decreases weight gain, lowers insulin requirement, and improves glycaemic control, and should be continued in patients with Type 2 diabetes who transfer to insulin.

Three generations of autoimmune diabetes: an extended family study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: One in four children with Type 1 diabetes in a population-based family study has an affected grandparent. We set out to study the clinical and immune features of diabetes in the grandparents' generation, and to examine sharing of HLA class II susceptibility haplotypes between grandparent and grandchild. METHODS: Of 5855 grandparents in the Bart's-Oxford family study, 428 (7.3%) were known to have diabetes. Clinical data and samples were collected from 115 of 213 surviving affected grandparents and from 219 unaffected grandparents within the same families. Samples were tested for ICA and autoantibodies to GAD and IA-2, and typed for HLA-DRB1-DQA1-DQB1. Transmission of HLA class II haplotype from affected and unaffected grandparents to the diabetic proband was compared. RESULTS: Of 115 affected grandparents studied, the median age at diagnosis was 61 years and at analysis was 73 years; 70% were diet or tablet treated and 30% were on insulin. One or more islet autoantibodies were found in 26% and 66% had one or both of the high risk HLA class II susceptibility haplotypes DRB1*03-DQA1*0501-DQB1*0201 or DRB1*04-DQA1*0301-DQB1*0302. In 79 informative families the HLA class II haplotype of the affected grandparent was transmitted to the proband more frequently than expected overall (59%, p=0.02), and in the insulin-treated subgroups (65%, p=0.03). CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: A total of 7.3% of grandparents reported a clinical diagnosis of diabetes and 2.2% had features of Type 1 diabetes. Genetic susceptibility was shared between grandparents with diabetes and their affected grandchildren. Diabetes in the grandparents of children with Type 1 diabetes often has an autoimmune basis, even when it presents late in life and does not require insulin treatment.

Diabetes in the parents of children with Type I diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Previous studies have reported an excess of Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in parents of children with Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. We set out to characterise the clinical and immunogenetic features of diabetes in parents of affected children, and to test the hypothesis that there is no excess of Type II diabetes within this population. METHODS: Clinical details were collected from 3164 parents of 1641 children with Type I diabetes participating in the Bart's-Oxford study of childhood diabetes. Islet cell antibodies, antibodies to GAD and IA-2, and HLA class II genotype were determined in a subset of this group. Individuals were assigned a classification of Type I diabetes on the basis of clinical features and measurement of islet autoantibodies. RESULTS: Of 184 parents with diabetes, 138 (75 %) were on insulin. At least one islet autoantibody was detected in 90 (59 %) of 152 parents tested, and of 116 who were HLA-typed, 23 (20 %) had the highest risk genotype HLA-DRB1(*)03-DQA1*0501-DQB1(*)0201 / DRB1*04-DQA1(*)0301-DQB1*0302. Of 46 non-insulin-treated parents, 12 had islet autoantibodies. Of all parents, 141 (4.5 %) were therefore classified as having Type I diabetes, and 31 (0.98 %) as Type II diabetes; 12 could not be classified because of missing data or samples. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: Autoimmune diabetes can present late and without immediate need for insulin treatment in parents of children with the disease. Previous studies have categorised this as Type II diabetes. Our study suggests that there is no excess of non-autoimmune diabetes in the families of children with Type I diabetes.

Safety of high-dose nicotinamide: a review.

Nicotinamide, the amide derivative of nicotinic acid, has over the past forty years been given at high doses for a variety of therapeutic applications. It is currently in trial as a potential means of preventing the onset of Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in high-risk, first-degree relatives. Nicotinamide is for regulatory purposes classed as a food additive rather than a drug and has not therefore required the formal safety evaluation normally expected of a new therapy. Because the safety of treatment with megadoses of vitamins cannot be assumed, a full literature review has been undertaken. The therapeutic index of nicotinamide is wide but at very high doses reversible hepatotoxicity has been reported in animals and humans. Minor abnormalities of liver enzymes can infrequently occur at the doses used for diabetes prevention. There is no evidence of teratogenicity from animal studies and nicotinamide is not in itself oncogenic; at very high doses it does however potentiate islet tumour formation in rats treated with streptozotocin or alloxan. There is no evidence of oncogenicity in man. Growth inhibition can occur in rats but growth in children is unaffected. Studies of its effects on glucose kinetics and insulin sensitivity are inconsistent but minor degrees of insulin resistance have been reported. The drug is well tolerated, especially in recent studies which have used relatively pure preparations of the vitamin. Experience to date therefore suggests that the ratio of risk to benefit of long-term nicotinamide treatment would be highly favourable, should the drug prove efficacious in diabetes prevention. High-dose nicotinamide should still, however, be considered as a drug with toxic potential at adult doses in excess of 3 gm/day and unsupervised use should be discouraged.

Influence of maternal age at delivery and birth order on risk of type 1 diabetes in childhood: prospective population based family study. Bart's-Oxford Family Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the influence of parental age at delivery and birth order on subsequent risk of childhood diabetes. DESIGN: Prospective population based family study. SETTING: Area formerly administered by the Oxford Regional Health Authority. PARTICIPANTS: 1375 families in which one child or more had diabetes. Of 3221 offspring, 1431 had diabetes (median age at diagnosis 10.5 years, range 0.4-28.5) and 1790 remained non-diabetic at a median age of 16. 1 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disease free survival and hazard ratios for the development of type 1 diabetes in all offspring, assessed by Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: Maternal age at delivery was strongly related to risk of type 1 diabetes in the offspring; risk increased by 25% (95% confidence interval 17% to 34%) for each five year band of maternal age, so that maternal age at delivery of 45 years or more was associated with a relative risk of 3.11 (2.07 to 4.66) compared with a maternal age of less than 20 years. Paternal age was also associated with a 9% (3% to 16%) increase for each five year increase in paternal age. The relative risk of diabetes, adjusted for parental age at delivery and sex of offspring, decreased with increasing birth order; the overall effect was a 15% risk reduction (10% to 21%) per child born. CONCLUSIONS: A strong association was found between increasing maternal age at delivery and risk of diabetes in the child. Risk was highest in firstborn children and decreased progressively with higher birth order. The fetal environment seems to have a strong influence on risk of type 1 diabetes in the child. The increase in maternal age at delivery in the United Kingdom over the past two decades could partly account for the increase in incidence of childhood diabetes over this period.