The N-end rule pathway: from recognition by N-recognins, to destruction by AAA+proteases.

Intracellular proteolysis is a tightly regulated process responsible for the targeted removal of unwanted or damaged proteins. The non-lysosomal removal of these proteins is performed by processive enzymes, which belong to the AAA+superfamily, such as the 26S proteasome and Clp proteases. One important protein degradation pathway, that is common to both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, is the N-end rule. In this pathway, proteins bearing a destabilizing amino acid residue at their N-terminus are degraded either by the ClpAP protease in bacteria, such as Escherichia coli or by the ubiquitin proteasome system in the eukaryotic cytoplasm. A suite of enzymes and other molecular components are also required for the successful generation, recognition and delivery of N-end rule substrates to their cognate proteases. In this review we examine the similarities and differences in the N-end rule pathway of bacterial and eukaryotic systems, focusing on the molecular determinants of this pathway.

The bacterial N-end rule pathway: expect the unexpected.

The N-end rule pathway is a highly conserved process that operates in many different organisms. It relates the metabolic stability of a protein to its N-terminal amino acid. Consequently, amino acids are described as either 'stabilizing' or 'destabilizing'. Destabilizing residues are organized into three hierarchical levels: primary, secondary, and in eukaryotes - tertiary. Secondary and tertiary destabilizing residues act as signals for the post-translational modification of the target protein, ultimately resulting in the attachment of a primary destabilizing residue to the N-terminus of the protein. Regardless of their origin, proteins containing N-terminal primary destabilizing residues are recognized by a key component of the pathway. In prokaryotes, the recognition component is a specialized adaptor protein, known as ClpS, which delivers target proteins directly to the ClpAP protease for degradation. In contrast, eukaryotes use a family of E3 ligases, known as UBRs, to recognize and ubiquitylate their substrates resulting in their turnover by the 26S proteasome. While the physiological role of the N-end rule pathway is largely understood in eukaryotes, progress on the bacterial pathway has been slow. However, new interest in this area of research has invigorated several recent advances, unlocking some of the secrets of this unique proteolytic pathway in prokaryotes.

ClpS is an essential component of the N-end rule pathway in Escherichia coli.

The N-end rule states that the half-life of a protein is determined by the nature of its amino-terminal residue. Eukaryotes and prokaryotes use N-terminal destabilizing residues as a signal to target proteins for degradation by the N-end rule pathway. In eukaryotes an E3 ligase, N-recognin, recognizes N-end rule substrates and mediates their ubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome. In Escherichia coli, N-end rule substrates are degraded by the AAA + chaperone ClpA in complex with the ClpP peptidase (ClpAP). Little is known of the molecular mechanism by which N-end rule substrates are initially selected for proteolysis. Here we report that the ClpAP-specific adaptor, ClpS, is essential for degradation of N-end rule substrates by ClpAP in bacteria. ClpS binds directly to N-terminal destabilizing residues through its substrate-binding site distal to the ClpS-ClpA interface, and targets these substrates to ClpAP for degradation. Degradation by the N-end rule pathway is more complex than anticipated and several other features are involved, including a net positive charge near the N terminus and an unstructured region between the N-terminal signal and the folded protein substrate. Through interaction with this signal, ClpS converts the ClpAP machine into a protease with exquisitely defined specificity, ideally suited to regulatory proteolysis.

Protein folding and degradation in bacteria: to degrade or not to degrade? That is the question.

In Escherichia coli protein quality control is carried out by a protein network, comprising chaperones and proteases. Central to this network are two protein families, the AAA+ and the Hsp70 family. The major Hsp70 chaperone. DnaK, efficiently prevents protein aggregation and supports the refolding of damaged proteins. In a special case, DnaK, together with the assistance of the AAA+ protein ClpB, can also refold aggregated proteins. Other Hsp70 systems have more specialized functions in the cell, for instance HscA appears to be involved in the assembly of Fe/S proteins. In contrast to ClpB, many AAA+ proteins associate with a peptidase to form proteolytic machines which remove irreversibly damaged proteins from the cellular pool. The AAA+ component of these proteolytic machines drives protein degradation. They are required not only for recognition of the substrate but also for substrate unfolding and translocation into the proteolytic chamber. In many cases, specific adaptor proteins modify the substrate binding properties of AAA+ proteins. While chaperones and proteases do not appear to directly cooperate with each other, both systems appear to be necessary for proper functioning of the cell and can, at least in part, substitute for one another.

Effects of substitutions in the binding surface of an antibody on antigen affinity.

The interactions between the Fab and single-chain Fv (scFv) fragments of an antibody (NC10) and its antigen, influenza virus neuraminidase, were analysed in the crystal structures of the Fab-neuraminidase and scFv-neuraminidase complexes. To investigate the contribution to binding made by cavities, salt links and hydrogen bonds in the antibody-antigen interface, 14 single amino acid replacements were made at six contact residues in the scFv fragment by site-directed mutagenesis. The binding affinity of each mutant scFv antibody for neuraminidase was determined with a BIAcore optical biosensor. Four of the mutations resulted in large changes in the free energy of binding to neuraminidase (deltadeltaG > 1 kcal/mol) and together may account for approximately 70% of the free energy of binding. Hence these data support the theory that a small number of residues form the 'functional epitope' and are most important for binding of NC10 to neuraminidase. The salt link between antibody residue (Asp)H56 and (Lys)N432 from neuraminidase was demonstrated to be important for affinity, since substitution of (Asp)H56 with Asn caused a large reduction in the free energy of binding (deltadeltaG = +2.8 kcal/mol). Hydrogen bonds provided by (Tyr)L32 and (Asp)H56 were also important for binding: mutation of (Tyr)L32 to Phe resulted in a significant reduction in binding affinity (deltadeltaG = +1.7 kcal/mol). Disruption of hydrophobic interactions (van der Waals contacts) led to significant reductions in affinity also ((Tyr)H99 to Ala, deltadeltaG = +1.5 kcal/mol; (Leu)L94 to Ala, deltadeltaG > +3.0 kcal/mol). An attempt to increase binding affinity by filling a cavity in the interface with a larger antibody side chain was unsuccessful, as the free energy gained by new antibody-antigen interactions did not compensate for the removal of cavity-bound water molecules.

Single-chain Fv of anti-idiotype 11-1G10 antibody interacts with antibody NC41 single-chain Fv with a higher affinity than the affinity for the interaction of the parent Fab fragments.

A single-chain Fv (scFv) fragment of anti-idiotype antibody 11-1G10, which recognizes an idiotope of anti-neuraminidase antibody NC41, was constructed by joining VH and VL domains with a (Gly4Ser)3 linker, with a pelB leader sequence, and two C-terminal FLAG tag sequences, and expressed in E. coli (10 mg/L). The 11-1G10 scFv was isolated by affinity chromatography on an anti-FLAG M2 antibody column as a 2:1 mixture of monomer and dimer forms which were separated by Superdex 75 chromatography; monomer (at 100 microg/ml) was stable for 7 days at 21 degrees C and 30 days at 4 degrees C, whereas the dimer slowly dissociated to monomer to yield a 2:1 monomerdimer equilibrium mixture after 30 days at 4 degrees C. The dimer was bivalent, with each combining site binding an NC41 Fab to yield a stable complex of Mr approximately 156,000. Binding affinities, determined in solution using a BIAcore biosensor, showed that the affinity for the interaction of 11-IG10 scFv monomer with NC41 scFv monomer was five- to six-fold higher than the interaction of the parent Fab pair. This is the first example of an scFv derived from a monoclonal antibody with a higher affinity than its parent Fab.