ABSTRACT
Although possible to recall in both forward and backward order, recall proceeds most naturally in the order of encoding. Prior studies ask whether and how forward and backward recall differ. We reexamine this classic question by studying recall dynamics while varying the predictability and timing of forward and backward cues. Although overall accuracy did not differ by recall direction, recall dynamics highlight key distinctions. Forward recall exhibits a modest advantage for correct transitions following errors, independent of cueing predictability and list length. Without consistent directional cueing, participants initiate backward recall more accurately, but this effect reverses with predictable directional cues. Following omissions, participants commit more fill-in errors in backward recall. Our findings implicate an asymmetric, cue-dependent retrieval process underlying forward and backward recall, with relative contributions of primacy and recency depending on directional predictability. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
