A phase 2 study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus durvalumab in resectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) are treated with surgery followed by adjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy or definitive chemoradiation, but recurrence rates are high. Immune checkpoint blockade improves survival in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC; however, the role of chemo-immunotherapy in the curative setting is not established. METHODS: This phase 2, single-arm, multicenter study evaluated neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy with carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel, and durvalumab in patients with resectable locally advanced HNSCC. The primary end point was a hypothesized pathologic complete response rate of 50%. After chemo-immunotherapy and surgical resection, patients received study-defined, pathologic risk adapted adjuvant therapy consisting of either durvalumab alone (low risk), involved field radiation plus weekly cisplatin and durvalumab (intermediate risk), or standard chemoradiation plus durvalumab (high risk). RESULTS: Between December 2017 and November 2021, 39 subjects were enrolled at three centers. Oral cavity was the most common primary site (69%). A total of 35 of 39 subjects underwent planned surgical resection; one subject had a delay in surgery due to treatment-related toxicity. The most common treatment-related adverse events were cytopenias, fatigue, and nausea. Post treatment imaging demonstrated an objective response rate of 57%. Pathologic complete response and major pathologic response were achieved in 29% and 49% of subjects who underwent planned surgery, respectively. The 1-year progression-free survival was 83.8% (95% confidence interval, 67.4%-92.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel, and durvalumab before surgical resection of HNSCC were safe and feasible. Although the primary end point was not met, encouraging rates of pathologic complete response and clinical to pathologic downstaging were observed.

Phase 1 trial of adavosertib (AZD1775) in combination with concurrent radiation and cisplatin for intermediate-risk and high-risk head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Adavosertib (AZD1775) is an inhibitor of the Wee1 kinase. The authors conducted a phase 1b trial to evaluate the safety of adavosertib in combination with definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed, intermediate-risk/high-risk, locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: Twelve patients with intermediate-risk/high-risk HNSCC were enrolled, including those with p16-negative tumors of the oropharynx, p16-positive tumors of the oropharynx with ≥10 tobacco pack-years, and tumors of the larynx/hypopharynx regardless of p16 status. All patients were treated with an 8-week course of concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy at 70 grays (Gy) (2 Gy daily in weeks 1-7), cisplatin 30 mg/m2 weekly (in weeks 1-7), and adavosertib (twice daily on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday of weeks 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 8). The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended phase 2 dose of adavosertib given concurrently with radiation and cisplatin. Secondary objectives were to determine the 12-week objective response rate and progression-free and overall survival. RESULTS: Three patients (25%) experienced a dose-limiting toxicity, including febrile neutropenia (n = 2) and grade 4 thromboembolism (n = 1). Two dose-limiting toxicities occurred with adavosertib at 150 mg. The median follow-up was 14.7 months. The 12-week posttreatment objective response rate determined by positron emission tomography/computed tomography was 100%. The 1-year progression-free and overall survival rates were both 90%. The maximum tolerated dose of adavosertib was 100 mg. CONCLUSIONS: Adavosertib 100 mg (twice daily on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday of weeks 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 8), in combination with 70 Gy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and cisplatin 30 mg/m2 , is the recommended phase 2 dose for patients with HNSCC.

Consolidation With Pembrolizumab and Nab-Paclitaxel After Induction Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Induction with four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy was the standard of care for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) until the approval of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in the first-line setting. Switch maintenance therapy has shown promise in improving survival by exposing patients to novel, non-cross-resistant agents earlier in their treatment course. METHODS: We performed this open-label, three-arm, randomized phase II study (NCT02684461) to evaluate three sequences of consolidation with pembrolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in patients without progressive disease post induction chemotherapy. Consolidation was either sequential with pembrolizumab for four cycles followed by nab-paclitaxel for four cycles (P→A), nab-paclitaxel followed by pembrolizumab (A→P), or concurrent nab-paclitaxel and pembrolizumab for four cycles (AP). RESULTS: Twenty patients were randomized before the study was closed early due to the approval of first-line checkpoint inhibitors. We found that consolidation is feasible and well tolerated, with 30% of patients experiencing grade 3 toxicity. The median progression-free survival and OS in months (95% CI) in P→A were 10.1 (1.5-NR), 27.6 (1.7-NR); 8.4 (1.2-9.0), 12.7 (4.4-NR) in A→P; and 10.2 (5.1-NR), NR. Quality of life as measured by FACT-L improved in the majority of patients during the course of the study. CONCLUSION: Sequential and concurrent consolidation regimens are well tolerated and have encouraging overall survival in patients with metastatic NSCLC.

CALGB 80403 (Alliance)/E1206: A Randomized Phase II Study of Three Chemotherapy Regimens Plus Cetuximab in Metastatic Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers.

PURPOSE: To determine the optimal chemotherapy backbone for testing in future US cooperative group studies for metastatic esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers. Cetuximab was added to each treatment arm based on promising preclinical data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated metastatic esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer were randomly assigned at a one-to-one-to-one ratio to epirubicin, cisplatin, and continuous-infusion fluorouracil (ECF), irinotecan plus cisplatin (IC), or FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and bolus and infusional fluorouracil). All treatment programs included cetuximab once per week. The primary end point was response rate. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, and safety. As prespecified, primary and secondary analyses were conducted only among patients with adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: This study randomly assigned 245 patients, including 222 with adenocarcinoma. Among patients with adenocarcinoma, response rate was 60.9% (95% CI, 47.9 to 72.8) for ECF plus cetuximab, 45.0% (95% CI, 33.0 to 57.0) for IC plus cetuximab, and 54.3% (95% CI, 42.0 to 66.2) for FOLFOX plus cetuximab. Median overall survival was 11.6, 8.6, and 11.8 months; median progression-free survival was 7.1, 4.9, and 6.8 months; and median time to treatment failure was 5.6, 4.3, and 6.7 months for each of these arms, respectively. FOLFOX plus cetuximab required fewer treatment modifications compared with ECF plus cetuximab and IC plus cetuximab (P = .013), and fewer patients were removed from treatment because of an adverse event or experienced treatment-related death. CONCLUSION: In combination with cetuximab, ECF and FOLFOX had similar efficacy, but FOLFOX was better tolerated. Although differences were nonsignificant, IC plus cetuximab seemed to be the least effective and most toxic of the three regimens tested.

A Cancer and Leukemia Group B phase II study of sunitinib malate in patients with previously treated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (CALGB 80603).

BACKGROUND: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) conducted a phase II study evaluating sunitinib in patients with progressive metastatic pancreas adenocarcinoma following prior gemcitabine-based therapy (trial CALGB 80603; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00397787). The primary endpoint was to determine the disease control rate (DCR) as measured by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (complete response, partial response [PR], and stable disease) at 6 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0-2 and with progressive pancreas adenocarcinoma following treatment with gemcitabine were eligible. Sunitinib was dosed at 50 mg orally days 1-28, every 42 days (1 cycle). The statistical plan called for a three-stage design. A DCR ≥15% was considered worthy of further study. RESULTS: In total, 77 patients were enrolled. Forty-two (54.6%) enrollees were male. The median age was 65 years. The ECOG performance status score distribution was: 0, 39%; 1, 50%; 2, 11%. The DCR was 21.6%; one patient (1.4%) had a PR and 15 patients (20.3%) had stable disease as their best response. The progression-free survival time was 1.31 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-1.38 months) and overall survival time was 3.68 months (95% CI, 3.06-4.24 months). CONCLUSIONS: The study met its primary endpoint; however sunitinib had minimal activity and moderate toxicity in a population of gemcitabine-refractory pancreas adenocarcinoma patients. For future studies, limiting enrollment to patients with an ECOG performance status score of 0-1 is recommended.