A systematic review of whether Health Impact Assessment frameworks support best practice principles.

OBJECTIVES: Health Impact Assessment (HIA) is an evidence-based approach to assess the likely public health impacts of a policy or plan in any sector. Several HIA frameworks are available to guide practitioners doing a HIA. This systematic review sought to determine whether these support practitioners to meet best practice principles defined by the International Association for Impact Assessment. STUDY DESIGN: This was a systematic review. METHODS: Three complementary search strategies were used to identify frameworks in June 2022. We used three databases to find completed HIAs published in the last five years and hand-searched their reference lists for frameworks. We also searched 23 HIA repositories using Google's Advanced function and contacted HIA practitioners via two international mailing lists. We used a bespoke quality appraisal tool to assess frameworks against the principles. RESULTS: The search identified 24 HIA frameworks. None of the frameworks achieved a 'good' rating for all best practice principles. Many identified the principles but did not provide guidance on how to meet them at all HIA steps. The highest number of frameworks were rated 'good' for ethical use of evidence and comprehensive approach to health (n = 15). Eight frameworks were rated as 'good' for participation, and two for equity. The highest number of frameworks rated 'poor' for sustainability (n = 11). CONCLUSIONS: There is marked variation in the degree to which HIA frameworks support the best practice principles. HIA practitioners could select elements from different frameworks for practical guidance to meet all the best practice principles.

Speed of spinal vs general anaesthesia for category-1 caesarean section: a simulation and clinical observation-based study.

Controversy exists as to whether effective spinal anaesthesia can be achieved as quickly as general anaesthesia for a category-1 caesarean section. Sixteen consultants and three fellows in obstetric anaesthesia were timed performing spinal and general anaesthesia for category-1 caesarean section on a simulator. The simulation time commenced upon entry of the anaesthetist into the operating theatre and finished for the spinal anaesthetic at the end of intrathecal injection and for the general anaesthetic when the anaesthetist was happy for surgery to start. In the second clinical part of the study, the time from intrathecal administration to 'adequate surgical anaesthesia' (defined as adequate for start of a category-1 caesarean section) was estimated in 100 elective (category-4) caesarean sections. The median (IQR [range]) times (min:s) for spinal procedure, onset of spinal block and general anaesthesia were 2:56 (2:32-3:32 [1:22-3:50]), 5:56 (4:23-7:39 [2:9-13:32]) and 1:56 (1:39-2:9 [1:13-3:12]), respectively. The limiting factor in urgent spinal anaesthesia is the unpredictable time needed for adequate surgical block to develop.

The outreach worker role in an anticipatory care programme: a valuable resource for linking and supporting.

OBJECTIVES: Keep Well, an anticipatory care programme which commenced in Scotland in 2006, aims to reduce health inequalities through holistic health checks in primary care in deprived communities. A new, non-clinical outreach worker role was created to provide support and signposting to Keep Well patients following their health check. There is currently little evidence regarding how the role is perceived. The aim of this study was to understand how staff and patients view the Keep Well outreach worker role. STUDY DESIGN: A qualitative interview-based study was carried out between July and October 2010. METHODS: One-to-one interviews were conducted with 12 Keep Well staff and four patients. Interviews were transcribed, coded and analysed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: The outreach worker role was viewed positively, particularly in terms of partnership working with practices and local services, and the benefits of support to patients. Referring patients to outreach workers reduced pressure on staff, who were able to spend more time on patients' physical health rather than mental health or lifestyle support. Support from an outreach worker enabled patients to make changes to their life and their health. Concerns were about staff turnover, poor referral rates, set-up of the project and misinterpretation of the role. CONCLUSION: Patients and staff perceive benefits from the outreach worker role in providing motivational support to patients from deprived areas.

A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia.

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal morphine is an effective analgesic post-cesarean delivery; however, it may be contraindicated or unsuitable in some patients. We compared the efficacy and side effects of intrathecal morphine with an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. The primary outcome was the morphine equivalents dose used in the first 24 h post-surgery. Secondary outcomes were pain scores and side effects, including pruritus, sedation, nausea and vomiting. METHODS: Planned recruitment was for 90 women; however, the study was terminated early. Sixty-nine women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. They were randomized to receive either intrathecal morphine 100 µg plus a sham TAP block or a TAP block with 0.5% ropivacaine 1.5 mg/kg, to each side to a maximum of 20 mL. Women were assessed at 2, 6, 10, 24 h and 3 months post-spinal. RESULTS: Sixty-six women completed the trial. The morphine equivalents dose used in the TAP block group was greater at 24 h compared with the intrathecal morphine group (7.5 mg (95% CI 4.8-10.2) vs. 2.7 mg (95% CI 1.0-4.3), F [1, 64]=9.62, P=0.003). There was no difference at 2, 6, or 10 h. Pain scores on rest and movement were higher in the TAP block group at all times although this only reached statistical significance at 10 h (P=0.001). Nausea and vomiting (P=0.02) and pruritus (P=0.007) were lower in the TAP block group. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, the TAP block was associated with greater supplemental morphine requirements and higher pain scores than intrathecal morphine but fewer opioid-related side effects. The TAP block may be a reasonable alternative when intrathecal morphine is contraindicated or not appropriate.

PIERS proteinuria: relationship with adverse maternal and perinatal outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the ability of three different proteinuria assessment methods (urinary dipstick, spot urine protein:creatinine ratio [Pr/Cr], and 24-hour urine collection) to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: We performed a prospective multicentre cohort study, PIERS (Preeclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk), in seven academic tertiary maternity centres practising expectant management of preeclampsia remote from term in Canada, New Zealand, and Australia. Eligible women were those admitted with preeclampsia who had at least one antenatal proteinuria assessment by urinary dipstick, spot urine Pr/Cr ratio, and/or 24-hour urine collection. Proteinuria assessment was done either visually at the bedside (by dipstick) or by hospital clinical laboratories for spot urine Pr/Cr and 24-hour urine collection. We calculated receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (95% CI) for each proteinuria method and each of the combined adverse maternal outcomes (within 48 hours) or adverse perinatal outcomes (at any time). Models with AUC ≥ 0.70 were considered of interest. Analyses were run for all women who had each type of proteinuria assessment and for a cohort of women ("ALL measures") who had all three proteinuria assessments. RESULTS: More women were proteinuric by urinary dipstick (≥ 2+, 61.4%) than by spot urine Pr/Cr (≥ 30 g/mol, 50.4%) or 24-hour urine collection (≥ 0.3g/d, 34.7%). Each proteinuria measure evaluated had some discriminative power, and dipstick proteinuria (categorical) performed as well as other methods. No single method was predictive of adverse perinatal outcome. CONCLUSION: The measured amount of proteinuria should not be used in isolation for decision-making in women with preeclampsia. Dipstick proteinuria performs as well as other methods of assessing proteinuria for prediction of adverse events.

How well do strategic environmental assessments in Scotland consider human health?

OBJECTIVES: Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is a systematic approach to identifying, describing, evaluating and reporting on the environmental - and health - effects of policies, plans and strategies. SEAs have potential to improve population health because they assess 'upstream' health determinants and recommend measures to improve these. The authors studied the range of health issues considered in SEAs in Scotland, and the evidence used in their assessment. STUDY DESIGN: Documentary review of 62 consecutive SEA reports. METHODS: Environmental reports were categorized by sector, and the health-related environmental problems, SEA objectives/criteria, differential impacts, evidence, recommended mitigation and monitoring were identified for each report. RESULTS: Environmental reports identified many health-related issues, and set a wide range of health-related objectives/criteria, but these were inconsistent for SEAs assessing similar plans. Few identified differential impacts or mental health impacts. Mitigation focused on mitigating adverse impacts rather than enhancing positive impacts. It was unclear what health evidence was used to inform the judgements made in scoring the plans against SEA objectives. CONCLUSIONS: Many SEAs in Scotland adopt a wide perspective on health, but most fail to identify differential impacts. Health involvement in scoping of health issues and better use of health evidence may enhance their quality.

Therapeutics and anaesthesia.

Many aspects of hypertension care outside pregnancy may be applied in pregnancy, but little information is available on which to base decision-making. It would seem reasonable to continue previous dietary salt restriction and physical activity in women with pre-existing (and controlled) hypertension, encourage a heart-healthy diet in all women with a hypertension disorder of pregnancy, and take patient preference into account when deciding on place of care. Although bed rest has become a key part of obstetric practice and for care of women with a hypertension disorder of pregnancy, in particular, the evidence is lacking to support this practice. This may also increase thromboembolic risk. Antihypertensive treatment is strongly advised for women with severe hypertension. The most common agents are parenteral labetalol, hydralazine, or oral nifedipine capsules. Clinicians should familiarise themselves with multiple agents. Until the role of antihypertensive treatment for non-severe hypertension in pregnancy is clarified by ongoing research, clinicians should explicitly state an individual patient's blood pressure goal, which could reasonably be anywhere between 130/80 and 155/105 mmHg. Labetalol and methyldopa are used most commonly. Breastfeeding should be encouraged. Many risk factors for hypertension (e.g. obesity), as well as hospitalisation and pre-eclampsia, all increase the thromboembolic risk for pregnant women, and care providers should consider thromboprophylaxis in the appropriate setting. Finally, anaesthetists play a critical role in the management of women with a hypertension disorder of pregnancy, and should be involved earlier rather than later in the course of their care.

Anterior cruciate ligament integrity in osteoarthritis of the knee in patients undergoing total knee replacement.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture has been implicated in the development of knee osteoarthritis (OA). This study aimed at determining the incidence of prior ACL deficiency in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR), the effect of prior ACL deficiency on function and the macroscopic and microscopic appearance of the ligament. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 95 patients undergoing elective TKR for OA were recruited. Pre-operative knee assessment included questionnaires and KT1000 testing. The ACL was examined macroscopically at TKR in all patients, and 10 ACL specimens were examined histologically. RESULTS: The ACL was absent in 12% of the patients. There was no significant correlation between the pre-operative assessment or function and operative findings. The ACL samples all demonstrated degenerative change of varying severities. CONCLUSION: ACL deficiency is uncommon in patients undergoing TKR for OA, and does not worsen pre-operative function.

The state of tranquility: subjective perception is shaped by contextual modulation of auditory connectivity.

In this study, we investigated brain mechanisms for the generation of subjective experience from objective sensory inputs. Our experimental construct was subjective tranquility. Tranquility is a mental state more likely to occur in the presence of objective sensory inputs that arise from natural features in the environment. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the neural response to scenes that were visually distinct (beach images vs. freeway images) and experienced as tranquil (beach) or non-tranquil (freeway). Both sets of scenes had the same auditory component because waves breaking on a beach and vehicles moving on a freeway can produce similar auditory spectral and temporal characteristics, perceived as a constant roar. Compared with scenes experienced as non-tranquil, we found that subjectively tranquil scenes were associated with significantly greater effective connectivity between the auditory cortex and medial prefrontal cortex, a region implicated in the evaluation of mental states. Similarly enhanced connectivity was also observed between the auditory cortex and posterior cingulate gyrus, temporoparietal cortex and thalamus. These findings demonstrate that visual context can modulate connectivity of the auditory cortex with regions implicated in the generation of subjective states. Importantly, this effect arises under conditions of identical auditory input. Hence, the same sound may be associated with different percepts reflecting varying connectivity between the auditory cortex and other brain regions. This suggests that subjective experience is more closely linked to the connectivity state of the auditory cortex than to its basic sensory inputs.

Inadequate pain relief with labor epidurals: a multivariate analysis of associated factors.

BACKGROUND: Labor epidural analgesia providing inadequate pain relief may cause maternal dissatisfaction and may fail to produce effective anesthesia when topped up for operative delivery. This study looked at factors associated with inadequate labor epidural analgesia. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected from 275 parturients receiving labor epidural analgesia. Pain was assessed 30 min after epidural insertion using a verbal pain scale of 0 to 100. A score of 10 or more was considered to represent inadequate pain relief. Sixteen factors chosen by experienced obstetric anesthesiologists for their association with inadequate labor epidural analgesia were studied. RESULTS: Fifteen parturients were excluded. Forty-four of the remainder (16.9%) experienced inadequate pain relief. Multiparity, history of a previous failure of epidural analgesia, the use of air for loss of resistance, cervical dilatation >7 cm at insertion all had a statistically significant association with inadequate epidural analgesia (P<0.05). Logistic regression showed that cervical dilatation >7 cm, a history of opioid tolerance, a previous failed epidural and insertion of the epidural by a trainee anesthesiologist increased the odds ratio for inadequate pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: The final model correctly classified 93% of the epidurals that provided effective analgesia but classified only 9.3% of those providing inadequate pain relief. This information can be used to develop a predictive score and change practice resulting in fewer inadequate epidurals.

Current CHS and NHBPEP criteria for severe preeclampsia do not uniformly predict adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between adverse maternal/perinatal outcomes and Canadian and U.S. preeclampsia severity criteria. METHODS: Using PIERS data (Preeclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk), an international continuous quality improvement project for women hospitalized with preeclampsia, we examined the association between preeclampsia severity criteria and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes (univariable analysis, Fisher's exact test). Not evaluated were variables performed in <80% of pregnancies (e.g., 24-hour proteinuria). RESULTS: Few of the evaluated variables were associated with adverse maternal (chest pain/dyspnea, thrombocytopenia, 'elevated liver enzymes', HELLP syndrome, and creatinine >110 microM) or perinatal outcomes (dBP >110 mm Hg and suspected abruption) (at p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In the PIERS cohort, most factors used in the Canadian or American classifications of severe preeclampsia do not predict adverse maternal and/or perinatal outcomes. Future classification systems should take this into account.

Compliance with the CONSORT checklist in obstetric anaesthesia randomised controlled trials.

The Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) checklist is an evidence-based approach to help improve the quality of reporting randomised controlled trials. The purpose of this study was to determine how closely randomised controlled trials in obstetric anaesthesia adhere to the CONSORT checklist. We retrieved all randomised controlled trials pertaining to the practice of obstetric anaesthesia and summarised in Obstetric Anesthesia Digest between March 2001 and December 2002 and compared the quality of reporting to the CONSORT checklist. The median number of correctly described CONSORT items was 65% (range 36% to 100%). Information pertaining to randomisation, blinding of the assessors, sample size calculation, reliability of measurements and reporting of the analysis were often omitted. It is difficult to determine the value and quality of many obstetric anaesthesia clinical trials because journal editors do not insist that this important information is made available to readers. Both clinicians and clinical researchers would benefit from uniform reporting of randomised trials in a manner that allows rapid data retrieval and easy assessment for relevance and quality.

Transport policy and health inequalities: a health impact assessment of Edinburgh's transport policy.

Health impact assessment (HIA) can be used to examine the relationships between inequalities and health. This HIA of Edinburgh's transport policy demonstrates how HIA can examine how different transport policies can affect different population groupings to varying degrees. In this case, Edinburgh's economy is based on tourism, financial services and Government bodies. These need a good transport infrastructure, which maintains a vibrant city centre. A transport policy that promotes walking, cycling and public transport supports this and is also good for health. The HIA suggested that greater spend on public transport and supporting sustainable modes of transport was beneficial to health, and offered scope to reduce inequalities. This message was understood by the City Council and influenced the development of the city's transport and land-use strategies. The paper discusses how HIA can influence public policy.

Dextromethorphan and intrathecal morphine for analgesia after Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Dextromethorphan is an N-methyl-D-aspartic acid antagonist which can attenuate acute pain with few side-effects. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study of dextromethorphan and intrathecal morphine, we investigated postoperative pain, pruritus, nausea and vomiting in women undergoing Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. METHODS: Women were allocated randomly to one of six groups, to receive intrathecal morphine 0.05, 0.1 or 0.2 mg plus oral dextromethorphan 60 mg or placebo. RESULTS: The addition of dextromethorphan did not reduce postoperative pain scores (P=0.83). Compared with women receiving intrathecal morphine 0.05 mg, women receiving higher doses had a significantly higher incidence of nausea and vomiting [odds ratio for intrathecal morphine 0.1 mg, 4.0 (95% confidence interval 1.2-14.1); for intrathecal morphine 0.2 mg, 7.9 (2.3-27.1)]. Compared with women receiving intrathecal morphine 0.05 mg, women receiving higher doses also had a significantly higher incidence of pruritus [odds ratio for intrathecal morphine 0.1 mg, 3.2 (95% confidence interval 1.3-8.2); for intrathecal morphine 0.2 mg, 3.7 (1.4-9.5)]. Women receiving dextromethorphan had a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting [odds ratio 2.6 (1.1-6.3)]. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative pain after Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia was not reduced by the addition of oral dextromethorphan to a multimodal approach including intrathecal morphine.

Anesthesia for the parturient with pseudoxanthoma elasticum.

We present our experience in the anesthetic management of two parturients with pseudoxanthoma elasticum. The first had an epidural catheter inserted for labor analgesia and ultimately had a forceps delivery. The second had a cesarean section under epidural anesthesia and had a complicated postoperative course. There were no untoward effects of regional anesthesia in either of these two women. The anesthetic implications for parturients with pseudoxanthoma elasticum are discussed.

Ibuprofen versus acetaminophen with codeine for the relief of perineal pain after childbirth: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Pain from episiotomy or tearing of perineal tissues during childbirth is often poorly treated and may be severe. This randomized double-blind controlled trial was performed to compare the effectiveness, side effects and cost of, and patient preference for, 2 analgesics for the management of postpartum perineal pain. METHODS: A total of 237 women who gave birth vaginally with episiotomy or a third- or fourth-degree tear between August 1995 and November 1996 at a tertiary-level teaching and referral centre for obstetric care in Vancouver were randomly assigned to receive either ibuprofen (400 mg) (n = 127) or acetaminophen (600 mg) with codeine (60 mg) and caffeine (15 mg) (Tylenol No. 3) (n = 110), both given orally every 4 hours as necessary. Pain ratings were recorded before the first dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 12 and 24 hours after the first dose on a 10-cm visual analogue scale. Side effects and overall opinion were assessed at 24 hours. RESULTS: Ibuprofen and acetaminophen with codeine had similar analgesic properties in the first 24 hours post partum (mean pain rating 3.4 and 3.3, mean number of doses in 24 hours 3.4 and 3.3, and proportion of treatment failures 13.8% [16/116] and 16.0% [16/100] respectively). Significantly fewer subjects in the ibuprofen group than in the acetaminophen with codeine group experienced side effects (52.4% v. 71.7%) (p = 0.006). There were no significant differences in overall patient satisfaction between the 2 groups. The major determinant of pain intensity was forceps-assisted delivery. Overall, 78% of the treatment failures were in women with forceps-assisted deliveries. INTERPRETATION: Since the 2 analgesics were rated similarly, ibuprofen may be the preferred choice because it is less expensive and requires less nursing time to dispense. Further studies need to address improved analgesia for women with forceps-assisted deliveries.