Bioavailability Study of Menorest®, a New Estrogen Transdermal Delivery System, Compared with a Transdermal Reservoir System.

The aim of this study was to compare the bioavailability and plasma profiles of estradiol and estrone after repeated applications of 2 types of estradiol transdermal systems: a new adhesive matrix system (Menorest®) compared with a reference membrane/reservoir system (Estraderm®) and to evaluate their short term safety. This was an open, randomised, crossover study, with 2 treatment periods of 10.5 days separated by a 10-day washout period and with a 1-week follow-up. Participants were studied at Institut Aster, Paris, and Association de Recherche Thérapeutique (ART), Lyon, France, and included 31 healthy postmenopausal women, all volunteers aged between 49 and 67 years (mean 58 years). Each transdermal system was applied for three successive 3.5 day-wear periods (10.5 days) on the lower abdominal skin. Plasma estradiol and estrone concentrations were measured at steady-state, before and after the third application of each transdermal system at regular intervals over 106 hours. Cutaneous tolerance was assessed after each transdermal system removal. Although the extent of availability [area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and average plasma concentration (Cav)] was similar with both transdermal systems, their pharmacokinetic profiles were different, with Menorest® producing less fluctuating and more sustained plasma estradiol levels than the reference system. The mean estradiol to estrone Cav ratio was similar with the 2 transdermal systems and in the physiological range of premenopausal status. The incidence of adverse events was similar for both treatments, but a lower incidence of local erythema was observed with Menorest® (8.9%) than with the reference system (18.3%). In conclusion, during the entire wear period, Menorest® produced more sustained plasma estradiol levels with less fluctuations (40 to 72 ng/L) than the reservoir/ membrane system (18 to 102 ng/L). Menorest® gave estradiol plasma levels approximating the concentrations observed during the early to mid-follicular premenopausal stage, with a 2-fold lower incidence of erythema than with the reservoir/membrane system.

Plasma bioavailability of 2 long-acting oxytetracycline formulations in the pig.

Two commercially available long-acting oxytetracycline (OTC-LA) formulations were administered by intramuscular injection in 2 groups of 10 clinically healthy pigs at the recommended dose level of 20 mg/kg. Plasma concentrations were analysed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) of a period of 0 to 84 h. The limit of quantification of the assay was 0.125 microgram/ml. The comparison of the CMAX did not reveal any significant differences (4.45 +/- 1.30 and 4.40 +/- 0.9 micrograms/ml). The results were similar for the TMAX (3.60 +/- 1.58 and 4.00 +/- 2.67 h). The areas under the curve were also similar. The AUC0-84 h results were respectively 92.8 +/- 14.1 and 96.3 +/- 11.3 mg.h/l and the AUC0-infinity results were 99.5 +/- 14.7 and 106.7 +/- 15.4 mg.h/l. No significant difference was found. This may be considered as a preliminary study to demonstrate the bioequivalence of the 2 preparations. On the basis of the statistical analysis of the results obtained, a cross-over study using 2 groups of 20 animals is theoretically necessary for such a demonstration.

Pharmacokinetics of 2-(alpha-thenoylthio)-propionylglycine (TTPG) in healthy volunteers--an oral dose-proportionality investigation.

The dose linearity of 2-(alpha-thenoylthio)-propionylglycine (TTPG) pharmacokinetics after a single oral administration at three different TTPG doses (180, 540 and 1080 mg) was evaluated in 12 healthy volunteers according to an open, randomized, cross-over study with a 1-week wash-out period between each administration. The duration of the study, for each subject, was 4 weeks. Plasma concentration and urinary excretion of TTPG and its two systemic metabolites, namely propionylglycine (tiopronin) and thiophenecarboxylic acid (TCA) were assayed by a previously well validated HPLC method. Due to differences in the physical and chemical properties of these compounds, two assays were needed, one to measure TTPG and TCA as such, and one to measure derivatized tiopronin. Both used UV detection. TTPG, tiopronin and TCA were quickly detected in plasma, suggesting that the drug administered is rapidly absorbed and biotransformed, in part, in the systemic circulation into the two metabolites noted above. Time-to-peak for all three analytes showed a trend to increase with increasing doses of TTPG, being: 0.42, 0.40 and 0.67 h (P < 0.01) with TTPG; 0.53, 0.47 and 0.73 h (P < 0.05) with TCA; and 1.33, 2.13 and 2.58 h (P < 0.01) with tiopronin. Cmax showed the opposite behaviour with values (ng ml-1) normalized to the dose of 540 mg: 1235, 905 and 513 (P < 0.001) with TTPG; 888, 547 and 383 (P < 0.001) with TCA; and 7290, 6950 and 5170 (P < 0.01) with tiopronin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)