ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare two swept-source OCT optical biometers, the Anterion® (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) and the IOLMaster 700® (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany), in the analysis of biometric data, intraocular lens (IOL) calculation and postoperative spherical equivalent predictability. METHODS: This was a real-life, single-center, retrospective study including 152 eyes of 81 consecutive patients referred for cataract surgery. All patients were examined with the IOLMaster 700® and the Anterion®. Biometric data (axial length [AL], anterior chamber depth [ACD], mean keratometry [Km], K1 [flat keratometry], K2 [steep keratometry] and axis, TK1 [flat total keratometry], TK2 [steep total keratometry], central pachymetry, lens thickness [LT], white-to-white distance [WTW]), IOL calculation with the SRK/T formula, and postoperative refractive outcome at 1 month were compared. RESULTS: All biometric measurements were significantly different between the two biometers. Correlations were excellent for AL, pachymetry, ACD, LT and keratometry measurements, and for the IOL calculation (r>0.96, intraclass correlation coefficient=1). The IOL power for emmetropia was similar between both biometers when the SRK/T formula was used (20.84±3.24D versus 20.86±3.29D, P=0.61). The mean postoperative spherical equivalent prediction error calculated using the SRK/T formula was 0.03±0.5D for the IOLMaster 700® versus 0.01±0.47D for the Anterion® (P=0.12). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed excellent correlation and agreement for the biometric measurements and the IOL power calculation with the SRK/T formula between both biometers.
Subject(s)
Biometry , Cataract Extraction , Lenses, Intraocular , Refraction, Ocular , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Humans , Biometry/instrumentation , Biometry/methods , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Aged , Middle Aged , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Lenses, Intraocular/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over , Treatment Outcome , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/methodsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Steroid-induced ocular hypertension (OHT) occurs in approximately one third of cases after dexamethasone implant (DEXi) injection. Among these, more than one fifth occur after the third DEXi intravitreal injection (IVI). Our goal was to analyze the clinical profiles of these late responders. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A real-life, retrospective, observational study was conducted to assess demographic characteristics and intraocular pressure (IOP) responses in late responders (IOP ≥ 21mmHg, n DEXi ≥ 4). The following parameters were analyzed: IOP 2 months after IVI and number of glaucoma medications needed. The IOP response compared to baseline was defined as low (< +6mmHg), moderate (≤ +15mmHg) or high (> 15mmHg). RESULTS: Late steroid-induced OHT occurred in 20.8% of cases. Twenty eyes (18 patients) were included. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.8±1.9 years. They received a mean number of 9.5±4.2 IVI. The first OHT peak, measured at 25.3±3.2mmHg (21-31), occurred after 6.8±2.3 IVI. Approximately 65% of OHT spikes occurred between the fourth and sixth IVI; 35% occurred later. At maximum, 1.7±1.0 glaucoma medications and 0.75±0.79 SLT procedures were required to control the OHT, with no filtering surgery required. The ratio of "low," "moderate," and "high" responders was 5%, 85% and 10% respectively. CONCLUSION: Late steroid-induced OHT occurs after at least 3 DEXi in one fifth of multi-injected patients, requiring long-term IOP monitoring. This case series identifies mostly moderate responder profiles, whose IOP rise often remains well-controlled with medical management or laser treatment (SLT).
Subject(s)
Eye Infections, Fungal/complications , Mucormycosis/complications , Ophthalmoplegia/microbiology , Eye Infections, Fungal/diagnostic imaging , Eye Infections, Fungal/pathology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Mucormycosis/diagnostic imaging , Mucormycosis/pathology , Ophthalmoplegia/diagnostic imaging , Ophthalmoplegia/pathologyABSTRACT
This study examined the effectiveness of two different types of self-talk on the performance of a basketball-shooting task. 60 physical education and sports sciences students were organized into one control and two treatment groups which used self-talk. During the experiment, the control group performed with the general instructions, whereas the self-talk groups used the cue-words "relax" and "fast," respectively, Analysis showed that only the participants of the self-talk group who used the word "relax" improved their performance significantly as compared to the other two groups. It appears that self-talk can positively affect performance if its content is appropriate for the task performed.
