ABSTRACT
Knowledge of necrophagous insects' developmental data is necessary for the forensic entomologist to estimate a reliable minimum postmortem interval (PMImin). Among the most represented necrophagous species, Lucilia sericata (Diptera, Calliphoridae) is particularly interesting. It is regularly identified in samples, with a predominance in summer, and is commonly used by analysts of our entomology department (Institut de Recherche Criminelle de la Gendarmerie Nationale) to estimate the PMImin with the accumulated degree days (ADD) method. This method requires the mathematical lower thermal threshold to be known. This value dictates the quality of the applied ADD method but cannot be considered as fixed, especially when insect development occurs at temperatures close to the biological threshold. In such conditions, it is necessary to study the influence of such temperatures on development rate, as well as the consequences of estimating the period of first oviposition on cadavers, when using the ADD method. Seven replicate rearings were conducted at six different temperatures: 30 °C, 24 °C, 18 °C, 15 °C, 12 °C and 10 °C. Time of development and time of emergence were recorded. The effect of low temperature on the development cycle and the reliability of the ADD method under this entire temperature spectrum were studied using different linear regression models. Calculated durations of total insect time development and experimental rearing duration were then compared. A global linear model cannot be used on the whole temperature spectrum experienced by L. sericata without resulting in an overestimation at some temperatures. We found a combination of two linear regression models to be suitable for the estimation of the total development time, depending on the temperature experienced by L. sericata. This approach allowed us to obtain a variation lower than 2% at 12 °C and 10 °C between the calculated duration and experimental duration of development. In comparison, the results obtained with a global model show a variation higher than 3% at 12 °C and 10% at 10 °C.
ABSTRACT
The Department of Forensic Entomology (Institut de Recherche Criminelle de la Gendarmerie Nationale, France) was accredited by the French Committee of Accreditation (Cofrac's Healthcare section) in October 2007 on the basis of NF EN ISO/CEI 17025 standard. It was the first accreditation in this specific field of forensic sciences in France and in Europe. The present paper introduces the accreditation process in forensic entomology (FE) through the experience of the Department of Forensic Entomology. Based upon the identification of necrophagous insects and the study of their biology, FE must, as any other expertise work in forensic sciences, demonstrate integrity and good working practice to satisfy both the courts and the scientific community. FE does not, strictly speaking, follow an analytical method. This could explain why, to make up for a lack of appropriate quality reference, a specific documentation was drafted and written by the staff of the Department of Forensic Entomology in order to define working methods complying with quality standards (testing methods). A quality assurance system is laborious to set up and maintain and can be perceived as complex, time-consuming and never-ending. However, a survey performed in 2011 revealed that the accreditation process in the frame of expertise work has led to new well-defined working habits, based on an effort at transparency. It also requires constant questioning and a proactive approach, both profitable for customers (magistrates, investigators) and analysts (forensic entomologists).
