A National Analysis of Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Following Major Upper Extremity Amputation.

BACKGROUND: Post-amputation pain is a debilitating sequela of upper extremity (UE) amputation. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a relatively novel treatment that can help prevent pain and improve quality of life. The purpose of this study is to evaluate national trends in the application of immediate TMR following UE amputations.   . METHODS: An analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was conducted from 2016-2019. ICD-10 codes were used to identify encounters involving UE amputation with and without TMR. NIS weights were used to estimate national estimates of incidence. Patient-specific and hospital-specific factors were analyzed to assess associations with use of TMR. RESULTS: A total of 8,945 weighted encounters underwent UE amputation, and of those, only 310 (3.5%) received TMR. The majority of TMR occurred in urban hospitals (>95%). Younger patients (47 vs. 54, p=0.008) and patients located in New England were significantly more likely to receive TMR. There was no difference in total cost of hospitalization amongst patients who received TMR ($55,241 vs $59,027.8, p=0.683) but significantly shorter lengths of hospital stay when receiving TMR versus other management (10.6 vs. 14.8, p=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: TMR has purported benefits of pain reduction, neuroma prevention, and increased prosthetic control. Access to this beneficial procedure following UE amputation varies by demographics and geographic region. Given that TMR has not been shown to increase cost while simultaneously decreasing patient length of stay, increased efforts to incorporate this procedure into training and practice will help to ensure equitable care for amputation patients. .

Pain and Functional Outcomes following Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that by 2050, a total of 3.6 million patients will be living with an amputation in the United States. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the effect of targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) on pain and physical functioning in amputees. METHODS: A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE up to November 28, 2021. Clinical studies assessing the outcomes of TMR (pain, prosthesis control, life quality, limb function, and disability) were included. RESULTS: Thirty-nine articles were included. The total number of patients who underwent TMR was 449, and 716 were controls. Mean follow-up was 25 months. A total of 309 (66%) lower-limb and 159 (34%) upper-limb amputations took place in the TMR group, the most common being below-knee amputations (39%). The control group included a total of 557 (84%) lower-limb and 108 (16%) upper-limb amputations; the greatest proportion being below-knee amputations in this group as well (54%). Trauma was the most common indication for amputation. Phantom limb pain scores were lower by 10.2 points for intensity ( P = 0.01), 4.67 points for behavior ( P = 0.01), and 8.9 points for interference ( P = 0.09). Similarly, residual limb pain measures were lower for cases for intensity, behavior, and interference, but they failed to reach significance. Neuroma symptoms occurred less frequently, and functional and prosthesis control outcomes improved following TMR. CONCLUSION: The literature evidence suggests that TMR is a promising therapy for improving pain, prosthesis use, and functional outcomes after limb amputation.

Surgical management of popliteal artery entrapment syndrome.

Introduction: Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome (PAES) is a rare condition in which the popliteal artery becomes compressed by adjacent soft tissue structures causing progressive claudication. Due to its low incidence, this disorder and its surgical management is poorly described in the literature. This study presents our institutional data surrounding PAES management to further optimize care of this syndrome. Methods: This retrospective study gathered demographic, surgical, and outcome data of all patients with PAES who underwent surgical decompression at our institution from 2015 to 2022. Patients were identified using CPT and ICD-9/10 codes. Summary statistics were calculated, with Chi-squared and T-test used for subgroup analysis. Results: 50 surgical patients with PAES were identified. On average, they were young (mean age: 20.7 years), mostly female (78 %), and predominately white (68 %). The vast majority were physically active, with 13 of the 50 patients being runners (26 %). Medically, the cohort was otherwise healthy, with 74 % reporting no comorbidities. Diagnosis was often delayed, with patients on average seeing 4.5 physicians over 2.0 years prior to arriving at our institution for care. In addition to popliteal artery release, the second most performed procedure was fasciotomy (82 %). Postoperatively, there was significant long-term subjective improvement, with 91 % of patients reporting they would repeat the operation and 65 % reporting improved activity. Conclusion: PAES is a rare condition affecting the lower limb that requires a nuanced surgical approach. From diagnosis to outcome, we hope to better inform surgeons of PAES so that these patients may receive the highest quality care.

Hand and Wrist Amputation: A Demographic Analysis Using the National Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic hand and wrist amputations are rare but debilitating injuries. Surgical replantation of the hand provides a unique alternative to revision surgery but requires appropriate access to necessary medical resources. This study aims to understand the national practice of replantation of traumatic hand amputation and to determine whether disparities exist in accessing surgical treatment. METHODS: International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes for replantation and revision amputation surgeries were used to gather data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2019. Summary statistics were calculated on demographic, hospital, and outcome variables, with subanalysis performed for effect on replantation and revision rates. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were identified. The average patient was 35 years old with a strong male predominance (90%). The racial distribution of the cohort roughly mirrored the demographic proportions of race in the US population. Fifteen (21%) patients underwent replantation. This rate was similar between sexes, races, and income brackets. Hand replantation was primarily performed at large bed size (87%), private not-for-profit (73%), and urban teaching hospitals (94%). The most common insurance status for these patients was private, followed by Medicaid, Medicare, and self-pay. Forty-seven patients underwent revision amputation (65%) with no association between demographic characteristics. The patients remained hospitalized for significantly longer periods (P = .0188) and paid significantly more (P = .0014) if replanted. The patients were most frequently discharged home (65%), followed by skilled nursing facilities (18%). CONCLUSION: This study describes the current state of hand amputation management and finds no evidence of sociodemographic factors influencing the surgical care provided.