Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn ; 13(9): 1252-1258, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34330406

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The establishment of interprofessional education (IPE) as an effective method for training future health care providers, the subsequent establishment of IPE requirements in accreditation standards, and the challenges to integrating IPE into professional-centric curricula have created an environment that encourages opportunity for innovation and collaboration in curriculum design. INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION ACTIVITY: Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) Core Competencies were integrated into an Interprofessional Case Conference (ICC) model that included six annual case conferences involving students from eight health professions across multiple campuses. Students worked in groups of eight with no more than two students from each profession per group. Interprofessional teams facilitated live progressive cases consisting of iterative guided student discussion alternating with group problem solving, followed by "talk-show style" reports. A retrospective pre-post study design using the validated IPEC Competency Self-Assessment V3 and Student Perspective of Interprofessional Clinical Education tools assessed student perspectives of the ICC model. The online survey was sent to participants who attended at least one ICC in 2015-2016 and 2016-2017. DISCUSSION: Pre-/post-data was available from 94 students. Results revealed modest, but significant, score changes across both instruments, confirming the value of IPE and the ICC training model. IMPLICATIONS: The ICC formula allowed flexibility in applying IPE, resolved scheduling and resources challenges, complemented other IPE programming, and assisted in meeting pharmacy accreditation requirements and the diverse IPE needs of health professions education. The model is flexible, inexpensive, and could be readily replicated at other institutions.


Subject(s)
Interprofessional Relations , Pharmacy , Curriculum , Health Personnel/education , Humans , Retrospective Studies
2.
Arch Sex Behav ; 44(5): 1139-45, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25894646

ABSTRACT

The move from "paraphilias" to "paraphilic disorders," where only the latter constitute mental disorders, has been hailed as a major change to the conception of non-normative sexualities in DSM-5. However, this is a claim that has been criticized by numerous activists and doctors working for removal of all diagnoses of so-called sexual disorders from the APA's manual. This article, written from a critical humanities, queer theory-inflected perspective, examines the historical and ideological grounds underlying the inclusion of the newly branded "paraphilic disorders" in DSM-5. It argues that the diagnosis does nothing to overturn the conservative and utilitarian view of sexuality as genitally oriented and for reproduction that has colored sexological and psychiatric history. It suggests that despite homosexuality no longer being classed as a disorder, an implicit heteronormativity continues to define psychiatric perceptions of sexuality. In sum, this article proposes that (1) the production of the field of psychiatric knowledge concerning "perversion"/"sexual deviation"/"paraphilia"/"paraphilic disorder" is more ideological than properly scientific; (2) the "normophilic" bias of the DSM is a bias in favor of heteronormativity and reproduction; and (3) some sexual practices are valued above others, regardless of claims that the presence of a paraphilic practice itself is no longer a criterion for a diagnosis of mental disorder.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Paraphilic Disorders/classification , Paraphilic Disorders/diagnosis , Terminology as Topic , Forensic Psychiatry , Homosexuality , Humans , Pedophilia/classification , Pedophilia/diagnosis
3.
Curr Psychiatry Rep ; 15(6): 365, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23636988

ABSTRACT

The three D's of Geriatric Psychiatry-delirium, dementia, and depression-represent some of the most common and challenging diagnoses for older adults. Delirium is often difficult to diagnose and treatment is sometimes controversial with the use of antipsychotic medications, but it is common in a variety of patient care settings and remains an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality in older adults. Dementia may affect a significant number of older adults and is associated with delirium, depression, frailty, and failure to thrive. Treatment of dementia is challenging and while medication interventions are common, environmental and problem solving therapies may have some of the greatest benefits. Finally, depression increases with age and is more likely to present with somatic complaints or insomnia and is more likely to be reported to a primary care physician than any other healthcare provider by older adults. Depression carries an increased risk for suicide in older adults and proven therapies should be initiated immediately. These three syndromes have great overlap, can exist simultaneously in the same patient, and often confer increased risk for each other. The primary care provider will undoubtedly benefit from a solid foundation in the identification, classification, and treatment of these common problems of older adulthood.


Subject(s)
Delirium , Dementia , Depressive Disorder , Aged , Delirium/diagnosis , Delirium/therapy , Dementia/diagnosis , Dementia/therapy , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans
4.
J Hist Sex ; 18(1): 121-37, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19274881
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...