'Folfirinox' chemotherapy combined with contact x-ray brachytherapy 50kVp and 'CAP50' chemoradiotherapy aiming at organ preservation for selected intermediate distal-middle cT2-T3 rectal cancers: A feasibility study.

PURPOSE: The standard treatment of T2-T3 rectal adenocarcinoma is radical proctectomy by total mesorectal excision often combined with some neoadjuvant treatment. To reduce morbidity of this surgery, organ preservation strategy using various combination of radiotherapy, chemotherapy and local excision is gaining interest. Some randomized trials have proven the feasibility of such approaches. The OPERA trial demonstrated, for T2 T3<5cm diameter low-middle rectum, that a contact X-ray brachytherapy boost of 90Gy in three fractions over 4 weeks was able to achieve a planned organ preservation in 81% of patients at 3years with 97% success for tumour smaller than 3cm treated with contact X-ray brachytherapy boost first. To try to expand organ preservation to larger tumours we set up a feasibility trial in T2-T3 tumours using total neoadjuvant treatment and a contact X-ray brachytherapy boost. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The trial was approved by the institutional review board of Nice. Inclusion criteria were operable patients, 75years or less, adenocarcinoma of the low-middle rectum staged T2c-T3N0 larger than 3.5cm and less than 6cm in diameter or T2-T3N1 less than 6cm in diameter. Treatment started in all cases with neoadjuvant chemotherapy associating 5-fluoro-uracile, irinotecan and oxaliplatin ('folfirinox' regimen, four to six cycles). In case of good tumour response after four cycles, a contact X-ray brachytherapy boost (delivering 90Gy in three fractions) was given followed by chemoradiotherapy (external beam radiotherapy delivering 50Gy, with concurrent capecitabine). After six cycles if only a partial response (tumour still larger than 3cm) was seen, chemoradiotherapy was given and contact X-ray brachytherapy boost was delivered after that. At the end of this total neoadjuvant treatment a watch and wait strategy was decided in case of clinical complete response or radical proctectomy by total mesorectal excision for partial response. RESULTS: Between July 2019 and October 2022, 14 patients were included; median age was 66years (range: 51-77years), there were nine male and five female, two T2 N1 tumours, seven T3N0, and five T3N1, all were M0. Median tumour diameter was 40mm (range: 11-50mm); three tumours had a circumferential extension greater than 50%. Seven patients received four folfirinox cycles and seven had six cycles. Contact X-ray brachytherapy boost was given during folfirinox chemotherapy before chemoradiotherapy in 11 patients (and after in three). The tolerance was good, with no grade 4-5 toxicity. The main grade 3 early toxicity was in relation with the folfirinox regimen. A clinical complete response was seen in 12 patients at the end of the total neoadjuvant treatment (85%). All these patients are alive and have preserved their rectum with a mean follow-up time of 17.8months (range: 6-48months) and a good bowel function (low anterior rectal resection syndrome score below 30). The main contact X-ray brachytherapy boost toxicity was radiation ulceration in three patients that usually healed within 6 months, sometimes necessitating hyperbaric oxygen. CONCLUSION: The preliminary results of this feasibility study show that early tolerance of these intensive total neoadjuvant treatment is compatible with an acceptable toxicity. The high rate of organ preservation in this intermediate group of T2-T3 tumours is encouraging and is a good argument to start the next randomized TRESOR trial that will aim at achieving a 65% of 3-year survival with organ preservation in this intermediate tumour group.

Patients' needs in proton therapy: A survey among ten European facilities.

Aims: The number of Proton Therapy (PT) facilities is still limited worldwide, and the access to treatment could be characterized by patients' logistic and economic challenges. Aim of the present survey is to assess the support provided to patients undergoing PT across Europe. Methods: Through a personnel contact, an online questionnaire (62 multiple-choice and open-ended questions) via Microsoft Forms was administered to 10 European PT centers. The questionnaire consisted of 62 questions divided into 6 sections: i) personal data; ii) general information on clinical activity; iii) fractionation, concurrent systemic treatments and technical aspects of PT facility; iv) indication to PT and reimbursement policies; v) economic and/ or logistic support to patients vi) participants agreement on statements related to the possible limitation of access to PT. A qualitative analysis was performed and reported. Results: From March to May 2022 all ten involved centers filled the survey. Nine centers treat from 100 to 500 patients per year. Paediatric patients accounted for 10-30%, 30-50% and 50-70% of the entire cohort for 7, 2 and 1 center, respectively. The most frequent tumours treated in adult population were brain tumours, sarcomas and head and neck carcinomas; in all centers, the mean duration of PT is longer than 3 weeks. In 80% of cases, the treatment reimbursement for PT is supplied by the respective country's Health National System (HNS). HNS also provides economic support to patients in 70% of centers, while logistic and meal support is provided in 20% and 40% of centers, respectively. PT facilities offer economic and/or logistic support in 90% of the cases. Logistic support for parents of pediatric patients is provided by HNS only in one-third of centers. Overall, 70% of respondents agree that geographic challenges could limit a patient's access to proton facilities and 60% believe that additional support should be given to patients referred for PT care. Conclusions: Relevant differences exist among European countries in supporting patients referred to PT in their logistic and economic challenges. Further efforts should be made by HNSs and PT facilities to reduce the risk of inequities in access to cancer care with protons.

Impact of radiotherapy schedule on survival of patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors for advanced melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Preclinical and clinical data suggest a potential benefit in the addition of radiotherapy (RT) to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) during the treatment of advanced cancers. Nevertheless, the ideal patients for this approach and the optimal RT regimen is still debated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The aim of this study was to determine the effect RT schedule has on survival for advanced non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma patients (pts) treated with ICI (anti-PD1 or anti-CTLA4) and concomitant RT. RESULTS: A total of 58 pts were identified, of which 26 received RT concomitantly with ICI while the remaining 32 pts were treated with RT at the time of progression under ICI. The RT parameters associated with outcome include dose per fraction, biological effective dose, RT to all targets and lung irradiation. Independent predictors of improved progression-free survival were lung irradiation, melanoma histology, oligometastatic status (<6 metastasis), presence of liver metastasis, PNN<7000/mm3 and normal LDH. Independent predictors of improved overall survival were melanoma histology and normal LDH. Among pts who were irradiated at progression, 68.7% had an overall clinical benefit and had a median extension of ICI use by 2.3 months (range: 0-29.1), among which 2 presented with an abscopal effect. CONCLUSIONS: The irradiation of lung metastases may increase survival in patients under ICI. RT at progression could prolong the use of ICI, and neutrophilia and LDH should be considered during patient selection of this combined RT/ICI approach.

Fractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Pituitary Adenomas: An alternative escalating protocol of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy delivering 35Gy in 5 fractions.

PURPOSE: Evaluate efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) for patients treated for pituitary adenoma (PA) with an alternative HSRT escalating protocol delivering 35Gy in 5 fractions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From June 2007 to March 2017, 29 patients with pituitary adenoma were treated in Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre with an alternative HSRT protocol. Prescribed dose was 35Gy in 5 fractions of 7Gy. Radiographic responses were assessed by annual MRI. Hormone blood samples were evaluated each year after HSRT. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients aged between 23 and 86 years (median 54 years) were included. Twelve patients received HSRT for recurrent cases and 12 received postoperative adjuvant HSRT, 5 patients did not have surgery. After a median follow-up period of 47 months local control rate was 96%. One patient presented an out-field tumor regrowth 73 months after HSRT. The majority of PA were endocrine-active (18 patients, 62%). After HSRT, 8 patients (44%) presented complete response on initial secretion, 4 patients (23%) presented partial response on initial secretion. Four patients (14%) presented grade 2 or more acute radiation toxicities. One grade 4 visual disorder was observed for one patient. CONCLUSIONS: HSRT delivering 35Gy in 5 fractions represents a feasible treatment and shows promising results to reduce hormonal overproduction and to improve local control in PA.

Role of proton therapy in reirradiation and in the treatment of sarcomas.

Reirradiation and irradiation of sarcoma is often difficult due to the frequent need for a high dose of radiation in order to increase tumor control. This can result in a greater risk of toxicity which can be mitigated with the use of proton therapy. The present review aims to summarize the role of proton therapy in these 2 clinical contexts.

[New indications of protontherapy for adults intracranial tumours]. / Nouvelles indications de protonthérapie et essais cliniques en cours : tumeurs intracrâniennes.

Considering intracranial tumours, only few indications of protontherapy, such as chordoma, chondrosarcoma or uveal melanoma, are uniformly approved in the world. Other indications, excluding paediatric pathologies, are still debated. The aim of this article is to describe the rationale for the use of protonbeam irradiation for meningioma, pituitary adenoma, craniopharyngioma, paraganglioma, glioma, and schwannoma, and to inform the radiation oncologists if prospective studies or randomized studies are opened for inclusions. This article deals only with indications for adults.

Discontinuous stereotactic body radiotherapy schedule increases overall survival in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The duration of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may affect patient outcomes. We aimed to determine the impact of a continuous versus discontinuous SBRT schedule on local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) in NSCLC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive NSCLC stage I patients (475) treated with SBRT in four centers were retrospectively analyzed. The delivered dose ranged from 48 to 75 Gy in 3-10 fractions. Based on the ratio between the treatment duration (TD) and number of fractions (n), patients were divided into two groups: continuous schedule (CS) (TD ≤ 1.6n; 239 patients) and discontinuous schedule (DS) (TD > 1.6n; 236 patients). LC and OS were compared using Cox regression analyses after propensity score matching (216 pairs). RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 41 months. Multivariate analysis showed that the DS (hazard ratio (HR): 0.42; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.22-0.78) and number of fractions (HR: 1.24; 95 % CI: 1.07-1.43) were significantly associated with LC. The DS (HR: 0.67; 95 % CI: 0.51-0.89), age (HR: 1.02; 95 % CI: 1-1.03), WHO performance status (HR: 2.27; 95 % CI: 1.39-3.7), and T stage (HR: 1.4; 95 % CI: 1.03-1.87) were significantly associated with OS. The 3-year LC and OS were 92 % and 64 % and 81 % and 53 % for DS and CS treatments, respectively (p < 0.01). Cox analysis confirmed that the discontinuous SBRT schedule significantly increased LC and OS. CONCLUSION: DS is associated with significantly improved LC and OS in early-stage NSCLC patients treated with SBRT.

Contact X-ray brachytherapy for rectal cancer: Past, present, and future.

The Papillon experience and the Lyon R96-02 trial have shown that contact X-ray brachytherapy of 50kV is efficient and safe to achieve long term local control and organ preservation for cT1 and early cT2-3 rectal cancers. The OPERA trial, using the Papillon 50™ machine, brings further support to this preservation strategy for selected T2T3ab lesions. Future trials using a contact X-ray boost will try to consolidate and enlarge its place in organ preservation for rectal cancers.

Stereotactic Pelvic Reirradiation for Locoregional Cancer Relapse.

AIMS: Up to 40% of patients who have received radiation for a pelvic malignancy will develop locoregional recurrence in the previously irradiated volume. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been used in the oligometastatic setting, and provides an ablative approach ideal for reirradiation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes after SBRT reirradiation of extraosseous recurrences in the pelvis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single institution retrospective study evaluated patients treated with SBRT reirradiation in the pelvis from January 2011 to February 2018. Patients with more than five oligometastatic lesions, >7 cm in size, and recurrence within the prostate were excluded. RESULTS: In total, 30 patients were treated with SBRT with a median follow-up of 29.4 months. The primary tumour sites were most commonly rectum (30.8%) and prostate (30.8%). The median time interval between irradiation for the primary and SBRT reirradiation was 48 months (3-245). The typical reirradiation treatment was 35 Gy in five fractions, the median gross tumour volume size was 10.2 (0.3-110.5) ml and the most common target was the iliac nodes (40%). There were three (10%) acute grade 3 toxicities and no late grade 3 or more toxicities. At 12/24 months, local relapse-free survival, metastasis-free survival, progression-free survival and overall survival were 67.7%/50.7%, 67%/41.7%, 34.8%/14.9% and 83.2%/62.5%, respectively. On univariate analysis, improved local control was associated with low gross tumour volume (<10 ml) (P = 0.003) and prostate primary (P = 0.02), but was no longer significant on multivariate analysis. The proximity of organ at risk to the target did not significantly correlate with worse toxicity (P = 0.14) or tumour coverage (gross tumour volume: P = 0.8, planning target volume: P = 0.4). CONCLUSION: SBRT pelvic reirradiation in oligometastatic patients is a safe and effective treatment modality. Careful consideration should be taken with larger tumour size, as it may be associated with worse oncological and toxicity outcome.

[Do dose constraints to organs at risk need to be adapted when irradiation is combined with drug therapy?] / Faut-il moduler les contraintes de dose dans les organes à risque lors d'une irradiation en association avec un traitement anticancéreux systémique ?

Therapeutic strategies combining irradiation and drugs including chemotherapy, hormonotherapy, but also more recently targeted therapy and immunotherapy are routinely used for cancer treatment. Nevertheless, combined treatments usually lead to a rise in toxicity. In order to increase the therapeutic ratio in favour of a multimodality treatment, adapting dose constraints to organs at risk may be the key to lower the risk of toxicity. A review of the literature was conducted, focusing on the toxicity in dose-limiting organs at risk when radiation therapy is associated with drugs. Four situations were differentiated, including : 1) some contraindicated combinations due to an inacceptable increased of toxicity, or recommendations of careful use with restricted indications, reduction in prescribed dose, or severe dose constraints to organs at risk, 2) combined treatments without increased toxicity with no arguments for adjusted dose constraints, 3) associations with higher risk of toxicity, for which dose constraints could be adapted, 4) combined therapies with limited tolerance data, prohibiting their use out of clinical trials.

Radiotherapy for primary tumor in lung cancer with synchronous metastases: Overview from the past and proposal for the future.

The management of metastatic lung cancers, either of the small-cell (SCLC) or the non-small cell (NSCLC) subtype, largely based on systemic treatments so far, has been the subject of breakthrough advances over the past few years, with notably the wide use of immunotherapy changing the landscape of these harmful prognosis diseases. In parallel with this major progress, the increasing use of radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of the primary thoracic lesion±the distant lesions, may contribute to improving the condition of these metastatic patients, both in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). This review proposes to summarize and explain the findings provided by the different studies published in the last years experiencing RT of the primary tumor in metastatic lung cancers, either associated or not with the local ablative treatment of a low number of distant lesions. It will also expose the respective limits encountered in these studies and, in the light of all these elements, suggests various promising issues and fields of research for the future.

A brief history of contact X-ray brachytherapy 50 kVp.

Contact X ray brachytherapy 50 kVp was initiated in the 1930s with the Siemens unit and popularized with the Philips unit in the 1950s. A renaissance was seen in the early 2000s with the Intrabeam™ unit for breast IORT. Presently the Papillon™ systems thanks to its high dose rate (>10Gy/mn) can be used to treat breast (IORT), skin, eyelid and rectal cancers. Future developments are expected to consolidate the place of contact radiotherapy as a safe and efficient treatment for accessible early tumors.

[Role of immunotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer]. / Place de l'immunothérapie dans le cancer bronchique non à petites cellules localement avancé.

Concomitant radiochemotherapy has been the standard of care for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), irrespective of histological sub-type or molecular characteristics. Currently, only 15-30 % of patients are alive five years after radiochemotherapy, and this figure remains largely unchanged despite multiple phase III randomised trials. In recent years, immune-checkpoint blockades with anti-PD-(L)1 have revolutionised the care of metastatic NSCLC, becoming the standard front- and second-line strategy. Several preclinical studies reported an increased tumour antigen release, improved antigen presentation, and T-cell infiltration in irradiated tumours. Immunotherapy has therefore recently been evaluated for patients with locally advanced stage III NSCLC. Following the PACIFIC trial, the anti-PD-L1 durvalumab antibody has emerged as a new standard consolidative treatment for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC whose disease has not progressed following concomitant platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. Immunoradiotherapy therefore appears to be a promising association in patients with localised NSCLC. Many trials are currently evaluating the value of concomitant immunotherapy and chemoradiotherapy and/or consolidative chemotherapy with immunotherapy in patients with locally advanced unresectable NSCLC.

[Proton therapy in France in 2019]. / État des lieux de la protonthérapie en France en 2019.

Among over 100 proton therapy centres worldwide in operation or under construction, French proton therapy is coming to full maturity with the recent opening of the Nice (1991, upgrade in 2016) and Caen (2018) facilities next to the Orsay (1991, upgrade in 2010) centre. Proton therapy is a national priority for children and young adults in all three centres. The patient-related activity of the three French centres is coordinated via the Protonshare portal to optimise referral by type of indication and available expertise in coordination with the French society of radiation oncology SFRO and French radiotherapy centres. The centres are recognised by the French Health Care excellence initiative, promoted by the ministry of Foreign Affairs. The three centres collaborate structurally in terms of clinical research and are engaged at the international level in the participation to European databases and research initiatives. Concerted actions are now also promoted in preclinical research via the Radiotransnet network. Ongoing French developments in proton therapy are well presented in international hadron therapy meetings, including European Proton Therapy Network and Particle Therapy Cooperative Oncology Group. Proton therapy teaching in France is offered at several levels and is open to colleagues from all radiation oncology centres, so that they are fully informed, involved and trained to facility recognition of possible indications and thereby to contribute to appropriate patient referral. This close collaboration between all actors in French radiation oncology facilitates the work to demonstrate the required level of medical and scientific evidence for current and emerging indications for particle therapy. Based on that, the future might entail a possible creation of more proton therapy facilities in France.

Ulcer of Lipschutz, a rare and unknown cause of genital ulceration.

Acute genital ulcers are painful and distressing to women. Lipchutz Ulcer is an uncommon disease that typically occurs in sexually inactive young women. The main differential diagnosis are sexually-transmitted or non-infectious diseases which cause genital or oro-genital ulcerations. This article aims to review the diagnosis of acute genital ulcers and, through a rare case of acute genital ulcerations, to discuss diagnostic procedures.

Late toxicities and clinical outcome at 5 years of the ACCORD 12/0405-PRODIGE 02 trial comparing two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for intermediate-risk rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Outcome of intermediate risk rectal cancer may be improved by the addition of oxaliplatin during 5-fluoruracil concomitant neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The purpose of this study is to analyze the main clinical results of the ACCORD12 trial (NCT00227747) in rectal cancer after 5 years of follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria were as follows: rectal adenocarcinoma accessible to digital examination staged T3-T4 Nx M0 (or T2 Nx distal anterior rectum). Two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens were randomized: CAP45 (RT 45 Gy + capecitabine) and CAPOX50 (RT 50 Gy + capecitabine and oxaliplatin). Main end point was sterilization of the operative specimen. Acute and late toxicities were prospectively analyzed with dedicated questionnaires. RESULTS: Between November 2005 and July 2008, 598 patients were included in the trial. After a median follow-up of 60.2 months, there was no difference between treatment arms in multivariate analysis either for disease-free survival or overall survival (OS) [P = 0.9, hazard ratio (HR)=1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.76-1.36 and P = 0.3, HR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.66-1.15, respectively]. There was also no difference of local control in univariate analysis (P = 0.7, HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.51-1.66). Late toxicities were acceptable with 1.6% G3 anal incontinence, and <1% G3 diarrhea, G3 rectal bleeding, G3 stenosis, G3-4 pain, G3 urinary incontinence, G3 urinary retention and G3 skeletal toxicity. There was a slight increase of erectile dysfunction over time with a 63% rate of erectile dysfunction at 5 years. There was no significant statistical difference for these toxicities between treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: The CAPOX50 regimen did not improve local control, disease-free survival and overall survival in the ACCORD12 trial. Late toxicities did not differ between treatment arms.

[Reirradiation of head and neck cancers]. / Réirradiation des cancers des voies aérodigestives supérieures.

Locoregional relapse in previously irradiated region for head and neck tumours is associated with a bad locoregional and distant prognosis. Reirradiation might be exclusive, or feasible in addition with surgery and/or chemotherapy, according to histopronostic factors. Data show that reirradiation is feasible with some severe toxicity due to the bad prognosis of this situation. Hyperfractionnated regimen with split course or normofractionnated regimen without split course are possible with similar efficacy. If tumour size is small, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy may be considered, and if the treatment centre has proton therapy, it could be proposed because of better organs at risk sparing. There is no standard regarding reirradiation schedules and several trials have to be done in order to determine the best technique. Nevertheless, it is agreed that a total dose of 60Gy (2Gy per fraction) is needed. Other trials testing the association with new systemic agents have to be performed, among them agents targeting the PD1/PD-L1 axis.

Effects of proton versus photon irradiation on (lymph)angiogenic, inflammatory, proliferative and anti-tumor immune responses in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

The proximity of organs at risk makes the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) challenging by standard radiotherapy. The higher precision in tumor targeting of proton (P) therapy could promote it as the treatment of choice for HNSCC. Besides the physical advantage in dose deposition, few is known about the biological impact of P versus photons (X) in this setting. To investigate the comparative biological effects of P versus X radiation in HNSCC cells, we assessed the relative biological effectiveness (RBE), viability, proliferation and mRNA levels for genes involved in (lymph)angiogenesis, inflammation, proliferation and anti-tumor immunity. These parameters, particularly VEGF-C protein levels and regulations, were documented in freshly irradiated and/or long-term surviving cells receiving low/high-dose, single (SI)/multiple (MI) irradiations with P/X. The RBE was found to be 1.1 Key (lymph)angiogenesis and inflammation genes were downregulated (except for vegf-c) after P and upregulated after X irradiation in MI surviving cells, demonstrating a more favorable profile after P irradiation. Both irradiation types stimulated vegf-c promoter activity in a NF-κB-dependent transcriptional regulation manner, but at a lesser extent after P, as compared to X irradiation, which correlated with mRNA and protein levels. The cells surviving to MI by P or X generated tumors with higher volume, anarchic architecture and increased density of blood vessels. Increased lymphangiogenesis and a transcriptomic analysis in favor of a more aggressive phenotype were observed in tumors generated with X-irradiated cells. Increased detection of lymphatic vessels in relapsed tumors from patients receiving X radiotherapy was consistent with these findings. This study provides new data about the biological advantage of P, as compared to X irradiation. In addition to its physical advantage in dose deposition, P irradiation may help to improve treatment approaches for HNSCC.

[Indications and results for protontherapy in cancer treatments]. / Indications et résultats de la protonthérapie dans le traitement des cancers.

Purpose was to summarize results for proton therapy in cancer treatment. A systematic review has been done by selecting studies on the website www.pubmed.com (Medline) and using the following keywords: proton therapy, radiation therapy, cancer, chordoma, chondrosarcoma, uveal melanoma, retinoblastoma, meningioma, glioma, neurinoma, pituitary adenoma, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, craniopharyngioma and nasal cavity. There are several retrospective studies reporting results for proton therapy in cancer treatments in the following indications: ocular tumors, nasal tumors, skull-based tumors, pediatric tumors. There is no prospective study except one phase II trial in medulloblastoma. The use of proton therapy for these indications is due to dosimetric advantages offering better tumor coverage and organ at risk sparing in comparison with photon therapy. Clinical results are historically at least as efficient as photon therapy with a better toxicity profile in pediatric tumors (cognitive and endocrine functions, radiation-induced cancer) and a better tumoral control in tumors of the nasal cavity. Clinical advantages of proton therapy counterbalance its cost especially in pediatric tumors. Proton therapy could be used in other types of cancer. Proton therapy showed good outcome in ocular, nasal tumors, pediatric, skull-based and paraspinal tumors. Because of some dosimetric advantages, proton therapy could be proposed for other indications in cancer treatments.