Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Transplant ; 16(12): 3512-3521, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27088432

ABSTRACT

Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for end-stage autoimmune liver diseases. However, the underlying disease may recur in the graft in some 20% of cases. The aim of this study is to determine whether LT using living donor grafts from first-degree relatives results in higher rates of recurrence than grafts from more distant/unrelated donors. Two hundred sixty-three patients, who underwent a first LT in the Toronto liver transplant program between January 2000 and March 2015 for autoimmune liver diseases, and had at least 6 months of post-LT follow-up, were included in this study. Of these, 72 (27%) received a graft from a first-degree living-related donor, 56 (21%) from a distant/unrelated living donor, and 135 (51%) from a deceased donor for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) (n = 138, 52%), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) (n = 69, 26%), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (n = 44, 17%), and overlap syndromes (n = 12, 5%). Recurrence occurred in 52 (20%) patients. Recurrence rates for each autoimmune liver disease were not significantly different after first-degree living-related, living-unrelated, or deceased-donor LT. Similarly, time to recurrence, recurrence-related graft failure, graft survival, and patient survival were not significantly different between groups. In conclusion, first-degree living-related donor LT for PSC, PBC, or AIH is not associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases/surgery , Family , Graft Rejection/etiology , Liver Diseases/surgery , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Living Donors , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Survival , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Recurrence , Risk Factors
2.
Anaesth Intensive Care ; 38(4): 654-60, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20715727

ABSTRACT

Nausea and vomiting are common complications of anaesthesia. Dexamethasone is an effective prophylaxis but is immunosuppressive and may increase postoperative infection risk. This retrospective cohort study examined the association between the administration of a single intraoperative anti-emetic dose of dexamethasone (4 to 8 mg) and postoperative infection in 439 patients undergoing single procedure, non-emergency surgery in a university trauma centre. Exclusion criteria included comorbidities, immunosuppressive medications or procedures that confer an increased infection risk. In the 10-week study period and three-month follow-up period, there were 98 documented infections (22.3% of the cohort), of which 43 were detected only on post-discharge follow-up. Anti-emetic dexamethasone was given to 108 patients (24.6%). Stepwise, multivariate logistic regression modelling identified significant associations between female gender, symptomatic reflux, respiratory disease and the risk of infection. The adjusted odds ratio for dexamethasone was 0.88 (0.5 to 1.5, P = 0.656). We did not demonstrate an association between anti-emetic doses of dexamethasone and postoperative infection.


Subject(s)
Antiemetics/adverse effects , Bacterial Infections/etiology , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Anesthesia/adverse effects , Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...