Response of right ventricular size to treatment with cardiac resynchronization therapy and the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in MADIT-CRT.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is increasingly recognized for its ability to reduce ventricular tachyarrhythmias, possibly associated with left ventricular reverse remodeling, but the role of the right ventricle (RV) in this process has not been examined. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between ventricular tachyarrhythmias and change in RV dimensions in patients receiving CRT with a defibrillator (CRT-D). METHODS: Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to assess the risk for fast (≥180 bpm) ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) or death by baseline and follow-up RV size (defined as right ventricular end-diastolic area [RVEDA]) among 1495 patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT). RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that treatment with CRT-D was independently associated with a 27% (P = .003) reduction in the risk of VT/VF or death among patients with larger RVs (>first quartile RVEDA ≥13 mm(2)/m(2)) compared with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)-only therapy, whereas in patients with smaller RVs there was no significant difference in the risk of VT/VF between the 2 treatment arms (hazard ratio = 1.00, P = .99). At 1-year follow-up, CRT-D patients displayed significantly greater reductions in RVEDA compared to ICD-only patients (P <.001), associated with a corresponding reduction in the risk of subsequent VT/VF or death (>first quartile reduction in RVEDA with CRT-D vs ICD-only: hazard ratio = 0.55, P <.001) independent of changes in left ventricular dimensions. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the RV may have an important role in determining the antiarrhythmic effect of CRT independent of the effect of the device on the left ventricle.

Phase I trial with biomarker studies of vatalanib (PTK787) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with enzyme inducing anti-epileptic drugs and standard radiation and temozolomide.

Targeting angiogenesis in glioblastoma (GBM) may improve patient outcome by normalizing tumor vasculature and improving delivery of chemotherapeutics and oxygen. Consequently, concomitant administration of small molecule inhibitors of the VEGF pathway will likely have a positive impact on chemoradiation treatment outcome. We conducted a Phase I study of vatalanib, a small molecule inhibitor of VEGFR, PDGFR, and c-kit in patients with newly diagnosed GBM receiving radiation, temozolomide, and an enzyme-inducing anti-epileptic drug in order to determine the MTD of vatalanib in this patient population. We incorporated circulating biomarker and SNP analyses and pharmacokinetic studies. Nineteen patients were enrolled and the MTD was not reached at the time of study termination. Vatalanib was well tolerated with only 2 DLTs (thrombocytopenia and elevated transaminases). Other grade 3/4 toxicities included leukopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, and hand-foot syndrome. There were no wound-healing complications. Of the 13 patients evaluable for a radiographic response, 2 had a partial response and 9 had stable disease. Vatalanib significantly increased PlGF and sVEGFR1 in plasma circulation and decreased sVEGFR2 and sTie2. Plasma collagen IV increased significantly by day 50 of treatment. Vatalanib was well tolerated and this study demonstrates the safety of oral small molecule inhibitors in newly diagnosed GBM patients. Blood biomarkers may be useful as pharmacodynamic markers of response to anti-angiogenic therapies.