Outcomes following formation of a dedicated pediatric liver transplant anesthesia team.

BACKGROUND: Given the complex nature of liver transplant surgery, adult centers typically use a dedicated liver transplant anesthesia team, which has improved patient outcomes. AIMS: Our goal was to determine whether a dedicated pediatric liver transplant anesthesia team was associated with improved patient outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients who underwent liver transplantation from April 2013 to September 2020 at St. Louis Children's Hospital. The general group (April 2013-December 2016) was compared with the liver group (January 2017-September 2020). Outcomes measured included cases per anesthesiologist, early extubation, ventilator days, fluid and blood administration, postoperative events, and intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Patients in both groups had similar demographics. The average number of cases/anesthesiologist/year was 2.9 times higher in the liver group (mean (SD) general 0.7 (0.5), liver 2.0 (0.6), and difference in mean [95% CI] 1.3 [0.8, 1.8]). The rate of extubation in the operating room was higher for patients in the liver group (general 56%, liver 80%, and difference in proportion [95% CI] 24.7 [7.0, 42.4]), while the number of ventilator days was lower (mean (SD) general 2.1 (4.4), liver 1.1 (3.6), and difference in proportion [95%CI] -0.9 [-2.6, 0.7]). Colloid administration was higher in the liver group (mean (SD) general 23.9 (14.5) ml/kg, liver 48.4 (37.7) ml/kg, and difference in mean [95% CI] 24.6 [12.7, 36.4]), while fresh frozen plasma administration was lower in the liver group (mean (SD) general 15.3 (23.9) ml/kg, liver 6.2 (14) ml/kg, and difference in mean [95% CI] -9.0 [-16.8, -1.3]). There were no significant differences between the groups in postoperative events including blood product transfusions, vasopressor use, and thromboses, or in the intensive care unit and hospital LOS. CONCLUSIONS: The liver group was associated with increased early extubations, decreased ventilator days, and decreased fresh frozen plasma use.

Expectations of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Fellows; Do We Meet Them?

OBJECTIVE: There are 16 accredited hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) fellowships in North America. The purpose of this study is to portray the expectations of the incoming HPB fellows about their training and its implication on their career. DESIGN: A 29-questions survey was sent out to all HPB fellows starting in August 2017. The survey was divided in 3 sections depicting background, in-training and postfellowship expectations. Descriptive statistics were generated for aggregate survey responses. SETTING: This study was performed through an online questionnaire that was sent to the participants via e-mail. The answers were processed in our offices in Methodist Richardson Medical Center, in Richardson, Texas which is a private tertiary medical center part of the Methodist Health System. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were all incoming HPB Fellows (In HPB fellowship programs accredited by the Fellowship Council) starting their fellowship in August 2017. RESULTS: We had a 94% response rate. Forty-six percent of fellows anticipate doing about 150 to 250 HPB cases during the fellowship, and all 15 fellows anticipate having at least 1 publication during fellowship. Despite that >90% of fellows believe that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches will be more frequently utilized in HPB surgery, only 3/15 anticipate being able to apply MIS techniques and only 54% will be robotically trained. Interestingly the majority of fellows believe that the attending should be performing the case the first few months. CONCLUSION: The trainees believe that case volume is the most important factor for choosing a fellowship and for adequate training. Most of the fellows anticipate doing adequate number of cases but only the minority feels they will be adequately trained in MIS-robotic techniques.

Adjuvant therapy is associated with improved survival after curative resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A multi-institution analysis from the U.S. extrahepatic biliary malignancy consortium.

BACKGROUND: Curative-intent treatment for localized hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) requires surgical resection. However, the effect of adjuvant therapy (AT) on survival is unclear. We analyzed the impact of AT on overall (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) in patients undergoing curative resection. METHODS: We reviewed patients with resected HC between 2000 and 2015 from the ten institutions participating in the U.S. Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium. We analyzed the impact of AT on RFS and OS. The probability of RFS and OS were calculated in the method of Kaplan and Meier and analyzed using multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 249 patients underwent curative resection for HC. Patients who received AT and those who did not had similar demographic and preoperative features. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, AT conferred a significant protective effect on OS (HR 0.58, P = 0.013), and this was maintained in a propensity matched analysis (HR 0.66, P = 0.033). The protective effect of AT remained significant when node negative patients were excluded (HR 0.28, P = 0.001), while it disappeared (HR 0.76, P = 0.260) when node positive patients were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: AT should be strongly considered after curative-intent resection for HC, particularly in patients with node positive disease.