[Cost-effectiveness analysis of aripiprazole once-monthly versus paliperidone palmitate once-monthly in the treatment of schizophrenia in France]. / Analyse coût-efficacité de l'aripiprazole injectable à libération prolongée (AILP) comparé au palmitate de palipéridone (PP) dans le traitement de la schizophrénie en France.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness ratio of aripiprazole once-monthly compared to once-monthly injectable paliperidone palmitate in the treatment of schizophrenia in France on the basis of results and data from the QUALIFY study. METHODS: Consumed resources data measured with a dedicated questionnaire and results on the quality of life scales from the QUALIFY study were combined with French standard unit costs of each collected consumed resources during QUALIFY to estimate the cost-effectiveness ratios of the two products. Multivariate sensitivity analyses were performed to test the combined impact of the different assumptions. RESULTS: Findings of the study showed greater efficacy on the quality of life (QLS) and psychiatric evaluation scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) observed in QUALIFY of aripiprazole compared with paliperidone palmitate. Findings also suggest a trend (P=0.0733) in the reduction of total costs linked to a statistical decrease (P<0,0001) in drug costs in the aripiprazole group. These findings are reinforced by the probabilistic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Aripiprazole appeared to be more cost-effective than paliperidone palmitate in the French context. Limits of this study are mainly related with the duration of the clinical trial and to assumptions on the transposability of measured consumed resources in the international clinical trial to the French healthcare system.

Cost-effectiveness model comparing dual-mobility to fixed-bearing designs for total hip replacement in France.

BACKGROUND: Instability is among the main causes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) failure. In clinical studies, THA with a dual-mobility cup (THA-DM) decreased the risk of instability after primary THA compared to THA with a fixed-bearing design (THA-FB). However, whether THA-DM is more cost-effective than THA-FB has not been established using Markov modelling with determination of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The objectives of this work were to: (1) measure the efficiency of these two options, (2) use the nationwide hospital electronic database (PMSI) to estimate direct costs of dislocations and revisions for instability, and (3) conduct deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to estimate potential mean annual cost-savings in France. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesised that primary THA-DM was cost-saving compared to primary THA-FB. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the database, we identified 80,405 patients who had THA in 2009 and we collected their outcomes over 4 years (2009-2012). Cost-effectiveness was assessed based on the costs of resources used for all consequences of prosthetic dislocation and paid for by the statutory health insurance system or other sources. RESULTS: THA-DM was associated with a relative risk of dislocation of 0.4 versus THA-FB. This risk difference translated into 3283 fewer dislocations per 100,000 patients with THA-DM. The corresponding cost-savings for the 140,000 primary THA procedures done in France annually was 39.62 million Euros. A relative risk of 0.2 would yield annual cost-savings of 56.28 million Euros. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, THA-DM was the less costly option under all hypotheses, with potential maximum cost-savings of more than 100 million Euros per year in France. DISCUSSION: This comparative cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that THA-DM may induce substantial cost-savings compared to THA-FB. This possibility should be assessed by long-term clinical studies of new-generation DM prostheses.

Impacto económico y en calidad de vida de la epilepsia resistente en España: estudio ESPERA / Quality of life and economic impact of refractory epilepsy in Spain: the ESPERA study

Introducción: El 30% de los pacientes con epilepsia no permanece libre de crisis con los fármacos antiepilépticos (FAE) disponibles actualmente. El objetivo del estudio fue estimar el impacto económico y en calidad de vida de la epilepsia resistente a fármacos (ERF) en España, según la definición de la Liga Internacional contra la Epilepsia (ILAE). Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo (12 meses) que incluyó pacientes adultos con epilepsia focal en tratamiento con, al menos, 2 FAE. Los costes sanitarios directos (€ 2010) se cuantificaron a partir de los recursos sanitarios y de sus costes unitarios. El análisis se realizó desde las perspectivas del Sistema Nacional de Salud (SNS) y la sociedad. El impacto de la ERF en la calidad de vida se valoró mediante los cuestionarios QOLIE 31-P, EQ-5D-3L y NDDIE. Resultados: Se analizaron 263 pacientes (304 seleccionados). El 70,0% tenía ERF y el 20,3% estaban controlados. Bajo la perspectiva del SNS el coste anual por paciente con ERF y por paciente controlado fue de 4.964 y 2.978 €, respectivamente (p<0,01). En relación con los pacientes con ERF, los pacientes controlados presentaron mejores puntuaciones en el QOLIE-31P (70,8 vs 56,4, p<0,0001) y EQ-5D-3L (75,6 vs 64,7, p<0,001), y menor incidencia de depresión mayor según la escala NDDIE (23 vs 8,3%, p<0,05). Conclusiones: En relación con la epilepsia controlada, la ERF se asocia a mayor consumo de recursos y costes, peor calidad de vida y mayor incidencia de depresión mayor, resultando, por tanto, en una considerable carga para el SNS y la sociedad (AU)

Introduction: Despite use of currently available anti-epileptic drugs (AED), 30% of epilepsy patients are not seizure-free. The purpose of this study was to estimate the quality of life and economic impact in Spain of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), as defined by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE). Methods: Observational retrospective 12-month study conducted in Spain including adults with focal epilepsy treated with at least two AEDs. Direct costs (€ 2010) were calculated based on health care resources used and their official unit costs. Costs were analysed from the perspectives of the Spanish National Health System (SNS) and society. The impact of DRE on patients’ quality of life was examined using the QOLIE 31-P, EQ-5D-3L, and NDDIE questionnaires. Results: We analysed 263 patients out of the 304 recruited. According to ILAE criteria, 70.0% of the patients had drug-resistant epilepsy, while 20.3% achieved seizure freedom. From the viewpoint of the SNS, annual costs for resistant and seizure-free patients were € 4964 and € 2978 respectively (P<.01). Compared to resistant patients, seizure-free patients showed better scores on QOLIE-31P (70.8 vs 56.4, P<.0001) and EQ-5D-3L (75.6 vs 64.7, P<.001). Seizure-free patients showed a lower incidence of major depression compared to resistant patients according to the NDDIE scale (23 vs 8.3%, P<.05). Conclusions: Results suggest that DRE is associated with increased use of healthcare resources and consequently with higher costs, poorer quality of life and higher incidence of major depression compared to seizure-free patients, thus representing a considerable burden to the SNS and society (AU)

Quality of life and economic impact of refractory epilepsy in Spain: the ESPERA study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite use of currently available anti-epileptic drugs (AED), 30% of epilepsy patients are not seizure-free. The purpose of this study was to estimate the quality of life and economic impact in Spain of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), as defined by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE). METHODS: Observational retrospective 12-month study conducted in Spain including adults with focal epilepsy treated with at least two AEDs. Direct costs (€ 2010) were calculated based on health care resources used and their official unit costs. Costs were analysed from the perspectives of the Spanish National Health System (SNS) and society. The impact of DRE on patients' quality of life was examined using the QOLIE 31-P, EQ-5D-3L, and NDDIE questionnaires. RESULTS: We analysed 263 patients out of the 304 recruited. According to ILAE criteria, 70.0% of the patients had drug-resistant epilepsy, while 20.3% achieved seizure freedom. From the viewpoint of the SNS, annual costs for resistant and seizure-free patients were € 4964 and € 2978 respectively (P<.01). Compared to resistant patients, seizure-free patients showed better scores on QOLIE-31P (70.8 vs 56.4, P<.0001) and EQ-5D-3L (75.6 vs 64.7, P<.001). Seizure-free patients showed a lower incidence of major depression compared to resistant patients according to the NDDIE scale (23 vs 8.3%, P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that DRE is associated with increased use of healthcare resources and consequently with higher costs, poorer quality of life and higher incidence of major depression compared to seizure-free patients, thus representing a considerable burden to the SNS and society.

[Management of immune thrombocytopenia in France before the era of thrombopoietin receptor agonists]. / Prise en charge du purpura thrombopénique immunologique en France avant la mise à disposition des agonistes du récepteur à la thrombopoïétine.

PURPOSE: Adult immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an auto-immune disease with most often a chronic course for which a consensual therapeutic strategy is missing. The objective of this study was to describe treatment practices in adult ITP in France before the era of thrombopoietin receptor (TpoR) agonists. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted in eight hospitals in France. All eligible patients were at least 18 years of age and were seen for a chronic ITP between January 2004 and March 2006 in one of the participating centers. Data were collected retrospectively from clinical charts. ITP treatment from disease onset was analyzed for every patient according to the time of diagnosis. RESULTS: The study included 122 patients (73% of women) with a mean age of 52.6 years. Patients in whom ITP had been diagnosed less than 4 years earlier (n=71) received on average 2.9 treatment lines. Corticosteroids possibly combined with intravenous immunoglobulins were most often used as a first-line. From the second line, up to 12 different regimens were identified. As a third line, rituximab and splenectomy were the most common therapeutic procedures. The number of splenectomy tended to decrease over time. CONCLUSION: This analysis reflects the great heterogeneity into the management of chronic ITP. Whether such heterogeneity has declined after national guidelines have been produced remains to be assessed as well as the place of the newly develop TpoR agonists.

Epidemiological survey of melanoma in the Auvergne region (France): is there an increased incidence in Auvergne?

To assess the efficiency of melanoma screening and prevention campaigns in the Auvergne region (France), cases of melanoma have been recorded since 1st June 1998. The epidemiological follow-up of melanoma was carried out using two sentinel networks; one involving the pathologists, and the other, the dermatologists of the region. Incidence was calculated using the capture-recapture method, by cross-matching the data supplied by both dermatologists and pathologists. Between June 1st 1998 and December 31st 2000, 363 cases of melanoma were recorded. The crude incidence rate of melanoma per 100,000 person-years was 17.1 for all melanomas and 14.6 for invasive melanomas. These rates of incidence were higher than the estimated national rate of France, and were close to incidences found in countries of Northern Europe. This might be explained by an increase in screening for melanoma, by more precise estimation of the incidence due to the capture-recapture method, or by geographic factors (mountainous area). An answer may be provided by following the variation in time of incidence and thickness of melanomas; the increase in the number of thin (low Breslow index) melanomas corresponding with increased screening.

[Cost efficiency study of lacrimal canal obstruction treatment]. / Etude coût-efficacité du traitement de l'obstruction du canal lacrymal.

OBJECTIVE: To compare three methods used to clear the lacrimal canal. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 32 files (20 for the dacryocysto-rhinostomy by endoscopic way, 5 for the dacryocysto-rhinostomy by external way and 7 cases of percutaneous stenting) were reviewed. For each, costs of performed interventions were reviewed. An average of the total cost per patient was calculated for all three methods and was then correlated to the initial efficiency of the method. RESULTS: Results show that the average cost for stenting is up to 1,366.80 EUR, for the endoscopic way is up to 2 001.53 EUR and for the external way is up to 2,220.46 EUR. ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) gives significant results when comparing stent to endoscopic way (p=0.000007) and to the external way (p =0.02). The analysis of sensitivity concerning the success rate of various treatments shows that the stent was potentially the most cost-effective and that a failure rate of 35.1% is rather acceptable by comparison to the endoscopic method. If the stent is considered as an outpatient intervention, then, a failure rate of 50% is acceptable. CONCLUSION: If the failure rate stays under 35.1%, the stent may be considered as a short-term cost-effective method.