Association of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Absolute Lymphocyte Count With Clinical Outcomes in Advanced Breast Cancer in the MONARCH 2 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Established prognostic factors for treatment response to cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors are currently lacking. We aimed to investigate the relationship of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) to abemaciclib outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of data from MONARCH 2, a phase III study of abemaciclib or placebo plus fulvestrant in hormone-receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer that progressed on endocrine therapy. Patients were divided into high and low categories based on baseline NLR (cutoff: 2.5) and ALC (cutoff: 1.5 × 109/L). The association of baseline NLR and ALC with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was explored using Cox models and Kaplan-Meier estimates. Tumor response and safety were also examined. RESULTS: NLR and ALC data were available for 645 patients (abemaciclib: N = 426; placebo: N = 219). Low-baseline NLR or high-baseline ALC was consistently associated with positive PFS and OS trends; low-baseline NLR subgroups also showed trends for better response. The abemaciclib treatment effect against placebo was observed regardless of baseline NLR or ALC. Univariate analyses showed baseline NLR and ALC were prognostic of PFS and OS. Baseline NLR remained significant in the multivariate model (P < .0001). No unexpected differences in safety were observed by baseline NLR or ALC. CONCLUSION: Baseline NLR was independently prognostic of PFS and OS. Low-baseline NLR was associated with numerically better efficacy outcomes, but the benefit of adding abemaciclib to fulvestrant was similar irrespective of baseline NLR status.

Safety in Japanese Advanced Breast Cancer Patients Who Received Abemaciclib in MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3: Assessment of Treatment-Emergent Neutropenia, Diarrhea, and Increased Alanine Aminotransferase and Aspartate Aminotransferase Levels.

Purpose: Our objective was to gain a better understanding of the safety of abemaciclib in Japanese patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed in pooled Japanese subpopulation data from two phase 3 studies assessing abemaciclib/placebo in combination with fulvestrant (MONARCH 2; M2) or non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (MONARCH 3; M3). For common, clinically relevant TEAEs, event characteristics and management were summarized by study. Results: In the Japanese safety subpopulation (abemaciclib: N=101; placebo: N=46), all patients experienced ≥1 TEAE (Grade ≥ 3: abemaciclib, 71.3%; placebo, 23.9%; no Grade 5). Clinically relevant TEAEs that were more frequent in abemaciclib-treated Japanese patients compared to the overall safety populations included diarrhea (any grade, 95.0%; Grade ≥ 3, 12.9%), neutropenia (any grade, 75.2%; Grade 3-4, 35.6%), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT; any grade, 39.6%; Grade 3-4, 14.9%), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST; any grade, 37.6%; Grade 3-4, 8.9%). Diarrhea was Grade ≤3 and successfully managed with medications (≥87%) and dose reductions (≤25%) and/or omissions (≤23.3%). Most Grade ≥2 diarrhea occurred in the first treatment cycle, declining thereafter. Neutropenia, the most common Grade ≥3 TEAE in abemaciclib-treated Japanese patients, was generally manageable with dose omissions (M2: 42.0%; M3: 23.1%) and/or reductions (M2: 16%; M3: 15.4%). Neutrophil counts plateaued after Cycle 2, recovering to pretreatment levels after discontinuation of abemaciclib. Hepatic events were managed with medication (≤21%) and dose adjustments (≤33.3%), with most Grade ≥2 events occurring in early treatment cycles. Discontinuation of any study treatment in Japanese patients occurred more frequently due to increased ALT/AST (M2: 9.1%/10.5%; M3: 16.7%/10.5%) compared with diarrhea (M2: 0%; M3: 2.8%) or neutropenia (M2: 0%; M3: 3.8%). Conclusion: Abemaciclib was well tolerated in Japanese patients in MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3, with common, clinically relevant TEAEs manageable with appropriate interventions.

First Clinical Experience with ONO-4232: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Healthy Volunteer Study of a Novel Lusitropic Agent for Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic parameters of up to 15 dose levels of ONO-4232, a selective agonist for the EP4 subtype of the prostaglandin E2 receptor, with a dual left ventricular lusitropic and venodilatory action, in healthy, adult, male and female volunteers. METHODS: In this randomized, single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, sequential-group escalation, first in human study, ONO-4232 (0.001, 0.003, 0.01, 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.12, 0.15, 0.18, or 0.27 ng/kg/min) or placebo was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion over 3 hours. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic data were collected during dosing and over a period of 3 days (Day -1 to Day 2), and at the follow-up visit (Day 7 [±2 days]). FINDINGS: Fifty-seven subjects received ONO-4232 and 19 subjects received placebo. Ten of the planned 15 cohorts (dose range, 0.001-0.27 ng/kg/min) were conducted. A total of 34 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 23 subjects. Overall, the majority of TEAEs were mild. No serious TEAEs or deaths were reported and no subjects discontinued due to adverse events. The most frequently reported TEAE was infusion site erythema. A decrease in systolic blood pressure from baseline occurred for ONO-4232 subjects compared with placebo that was statistically significant for the 0.08 ng/kg/min dose, and a dose-dependent increase in heart rate starting at 0.04 ng/kg/min and achieving statistical significance compared with placebo at 0.15 ng/kg/min and above. More orthostatic events occurred in the higher-dose groups and the dose escalation was terminated due to increasing occurrences of orthostatic hypotension/intolerance. Plasma concentrations of ONO-4232 reached steady state approximately 2 hours after the start of infusion and then declined rapidly after the end of infusion, and systemic exposure appeared to increase in a dose-proportional manner. Approximately 30% of the administered dose of ONO-4232 was excreted in the urine. IMPLICATIONS: In healthy adults ONO-4232 was generally well tolerated in the dose range of 0.001 to 0.27 ng/kg/min. There were dose-related changes in systolic blood pressure and heart rate. Infusion site erythema, which was likely associated with a venodilatory effect and possible evidence for the pharmacologic effects of ONO-4232, occurred increasingly with increasing dose. Pharmacokinetic parameters appeared to be dose-proportional. The study results support further evaluation of the cardiovascular effects of this first-in-class selective left ventricular lusitropic and venodilatory drug in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure.