ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based complementary treatment options for multiple sclerosis (MS) are limited. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of hippotherapy plus standard care versus standard care alone in MS patients. METHODS: A total of 70 adults with MS were recruited in five German centers and randomly allocated to the intervention group (12 weeks of hippotherapy) or the control group. Primary outcome was the change in the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) after 12 weeks, and further outcome measures included fatigue, pain, quality of life, and spasticity. RESULTS: Covariance analysis of the primary endpoint resulted in a mean difference in BBS change of 2.33 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03-4.63, p = 0.047) between intervention ( n = 32) and control ( n = 38) groups. Benefit on BBS was largest for the subgroup with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ⩾ 5 (5.1, p = 0.001). Fatigue (-6.8, p = 0.02) and spasticity (-0.9, p = 0.03) improved in the intervention group. The mean difference in change between groups was 12.0 ( p < 0.001) in physical health score and 14.4 ( p < 0.001) in mental health score of Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MSQoL-54). CONCLUSION: Hippotherapy plus standard care, while below the threshold of a minimal clinically important difference, significantly improved balance and also fatigue, spasticity, and quality of life in MS patients.
Subject(s)
Equine-Assisted Therapy/methods , Multiple Sclerosis/rehabilitation , Adult , Animals , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hippotherapy is a form of therapeutic riding which is used in the treatment of neurological and muscular disorders. Until now there has not been any high-quality randomised study that has proven its effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study are to evaluate whether hippotherapy (as add-on to physiotherapy and/or pharmacotherapy) is superior to the standard treatment (physiotherapy and/or pharmacotherapy as prior to the study) in terms of balance function and other patient relevant outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis. METHODS: The MS-HIPPO study is a prospective, randomised, examiner-blinded, controlled multicentre study. Patients were randomised to one of two groups: 12 weeks of hippotherapy accompanied by physiotherapy and/or pharmacotherapy (intervention) or 12 weeks of physiotherapy and/or pharmacotherapy as prior to the study (control). The primary endpoint is the change in balance function, as measured by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). The treatment comparison is evaluated using a covariance analysis with baseline BBS, centre, age, gender and EDSS as covariates. Secondary endpoints include fatigue, quality of life, pain intensity and spasticity. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The described study is the first randomised study evaluating the benefits of hippotherapy for patients with multiple sclerosis. In 5 national centres ten study physicians will screen potential participants. The expected results will help to improve the knowledge on non-pharmaceutical therapeutic options in this field.
