Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 208: 111097, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38244781

ABSTRACT

AIM: To describe the incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes in children in Manitoba over a ten-year period. METHODS: Population-based, provincial databases were linked to calculate the incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes in children < 18 years of age in Manitoba from 2009-10 to 2017-18. First Nation and all other Manitoban children are described separately. RESULTS: The incidence of type 2 diabetes increased from 16.0/100,000/year in 2009-10 to 31‧1/100,000/year in 2017-18 (p < 0.001). For First Nation children, the incidence increased from 73‧4 to 121‧2/100,000/year (p < 0.001). For all other Manitoban children, the incidence increased from 3‧3 to 10‧7/100,000/year (p < 0.001). The prevalence of type 2 diabetes rose from 66‧4 to 124‧2/100,000/year between 2009 -10 and 2017-18 (<0.001). The prevalence in First Nation children rose from 282‧8 to 517‧9/100,000/year (p < 0.001) and in all other Manitoban children from 18‧4 to 35.0/100,000/year (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes is increasing in Manitoban children. While the greatest increase is seen in all other Manitoban children, type 2 diabetes disproportionally affects First Nation children. Understanding the prevalence and incidence of type 2 diabetes in children is necessary for resource allocation and to inform program planning, aimed at both prevention and management.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Child , Humans , Manitoba/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Incidence , Prevalence
2.
BMJ Open ; 12(10): e062127, 2022 10 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36261234

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Rising use of methamphetamine is causing significant public health concern in Canada. The biological and behavioural effects of methamphetamine range from wakefulness, vigour and euphoria to adverse physical health outcomes like myocardial infarction, haemorrhagic stroke, arrhythmia and seizure. It can also cause severe psychological complications such as psychosis. National survey data point to increasing rates of methamphetamine use, as well as increasing ease of access and serious methamphetamine-related harms. There is an urgent need for evidence to address knowledge gaps, provide direction to harm reduction and treatment efforts and inform health and social policies for people using methamphetamine. This protocol describes a study that aims to address this need for evidence. METHODS: The study will use linked, whole population, de-identified administrative data from the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository. The cohort will include individuals in the city of Winnipeg, Manitoba, who came into contact with the health system for reasons related to methamphetamine use from 2013 to 2021 and a comparison group matched on age, sex and geography. We will describe the cohort's sociodemographic characteristics, calculate incidence and prevalence of mental disorders associated with methamphetamine use and examine rates of health and social service use. We will evaluate the use of olanzapine pharmacotherapy in reducing adverse emergency department outcomes. In partnership with Indigenous co-investigators, outcomes will be stratified by First Nations and Métis identity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the University of Manitoba Health Research Ethics Board, and access datasets have been granted by all data providers. We also received approval from the First Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba's Health Information Research Governance Committee and the Manitoba Métis Federation. Dissemination will be guided by an 'Evidence 2 Action' group of public rightsholders, service providers and knowledge users who will ensure that the analyses address the critical issues.


Subject(s)
Methamphetamine , Humans , Manitoba/epidemiology , Methamphetamine/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Olanzapine , Canada , Cohort Studies , Public Policy
3.
Pediatr Diabetes ; 23(7): 991-998, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35838140

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of mental health comorbidity in children with type 2 diabetes compared to a matched population without diabetes and children with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Population-based cohorts of 528 youth (7-18 years of age) with prevalent type 2 diabetes, 1519 matched children without diabetes and 778 youth with type 1 diabetes were identified from a clinical registry and linked to provincial health care records to assess the prevalence of mental health comorbidity using ICD-9CM, ICD-10CA and ATC codes. RESULTS: The majority of children with type 2 diabetes were of First Nations heritage. Compared to their matched peers, children with type 2 diabetes where more likely to have a mood or anxiety disorder before and after diagnosis [RR 2.38 (1.63, 3.48) p < 0.001 and 1.70 (1.39, 2.08) p < 0.001 respectively], to attempt/complete suicide [RR 3.18 (1.30, 7.81) p = 0.012 and 2.18 (1.32, 3.60) p = 0.0002 respectively] and be prescribed an antipsychotic [RR 2.33 (1.23, 4.39) p = 0.009 and 1.76 (1.23, 2.52) p = 0.002 respectively]. Following adjustment for age and sex, children with type 2 diabetes, compared to children with type 1 diabetes where more likely to have a mood or anxiety disorder and be prescribed an antipsychotic after diagnosis [RR 1.43 (1.07, 1.91) p = 0.015; RR 2.41 (1.44, 4.06) p = 0.0009 respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: Children with type 2 diabetes have high rates of comorbid mental illness. Programs to provide care, support, and education must address the mental health comorbidity in the context of the demographic, socioeconomic, and psycho-cultural characteristics of the population.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Adolescent , Child , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Humans , Mental Health
4.
Pediatr Diabetes ; 23(6): 660-667, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35643934

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe hospitalization rates and reasons for hospitalization in children with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and to compare these rates to a matched cohort without diabetes and to children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: Population-based cohorts of 528 children (7-18 years of age) with prevalent T2D, 1519 matched control children without diabetes and 778 children with T1D were identified from a clinical registry and linked to health care records to assess hospitalizations and reasons for hospitalizations using ICD-9CM and ICD-10CA codes. RESULTS: Children with T2D are more likely than their matched controls and children with T1D to be admitted to hospital in the year prior to diagnosis {RR 2.83 (1.77, 4.53) p < 0.0001 and 8.05 (4.05, 16.00) p < 0.0001, respectively}, in the first year post diagnosis {RR 3.19 (2.08, 4.89) p < 0.0001 and 3.04 (1.86, 4.98) p < 0.0001, respectively} and in the 5 year post diagnosis period {RR 1.99 (1.56, 2.53) p < 0.0001 and 1.91 (1.48, 2.46) p < 0.0001, respectively}. Mental illness was the most common cause for hospital admission in both children with T2D and their matched controls. CONCLUSIONS: This differs from children with T1D where endocrine causes constitute the most common reason for hospital admission. This analysis provides novel data on hospitalization rates and diagnoses in the increasing population of children with T2D. This information is important to inform health care programming and health policy planning to best meet the needs of this population.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Child , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Hospitalization , Humans
5.
Can J Public Health ; 112(3): 530-540, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33471346

ABSTRACT

INTERVENTION: In April 2012, the Manitoba Home Cancer Drug Program (HCDP) was introduced to allow 100% coverage for eligible oral anticancer agents (OAA) and supportive medications for Manitobans with cancer requiring these therapies. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: What is the extent of use and cost of OAAs among outpatients in Manitoba from 2003/04 to 2015/16? Did the HCDP change OAA user and prescription patterns? METHODS: This was a retrospective, population-based study using administrative data to measure the prevalence of drug utilization over time and the impact of HCDP on OAA use and prescriptions using generalized linear models. Manitobans with cancer who filled an OAA or supportive medication covered by HCDP from 2003/04 to 2015/16 were included. RESULTS: This study included 22,393 people with cancer who filled an OAA prescription. The prevalence of OAA use increased from 222 per 100,000 to 328 per 100,000 from 2003/04 to 2015/16. Hormone therapy for breast cancer was the most common class of OAA used (increased from 154 per 100,000 to 231 per 100,000). We observed a 2.6-fold decrease in the prevalence of oral alkylating agents and a 10.7-fold increase in the prevalence of protein kinase inhibitors during the study period. The total cost of targeted OAAs per year for all Manitobans with cancer increased from $1.8 million to $19 million. CONCLUSION: We observed an increase in OAA prevalence and the cost of oral targeted chemotherapy is high. Our findings underline the need for addressing these high-cost medications in future developments of a national drug program.


RéSUMé: INTERVENTION: Le Manitoba a introduit en avril 2012 le Programme de médicaments anticancéreux pris à domicile (HCDP en anglais), qui offre un accès entièrement gratuit aux agents anticancéreux oraux (AAO) admissibles et aux médicaments d'appoint aux Manitobains atteints de cancer qui ont besoin de ces traitements. QUESTIONS DE RECHERCHE: Quelle a été l'utilisation des AAO par les malades externes au Manitoba entre 2003-2004 et 2015-2016 et quel en a été le coût? Le programme HCDP a-t-il changé les modes d'utilisation et de prescription des AAO? MéTHODE: Cette étude populationnelle rétrospective a utilisé des données administratives pour mesurer la prévalence de l'utilisation des médicaments au fil du temps et l'incidence du programme HCDP sur l'utilisation et la prescription des AAO à l'aide de modèles linéaires généralisés. Les Manitobains atteints de cancer qui ont fait exécuter une ordonnance pour un AAO ou un médicament d'appoint couvert par le programme HCDP entre 2003-2004 et 2015-2016 ont été inclus. RéSULTATS: L'étude a inclus 22 393 personnes atteintes de cancer ayant fait exécuter une ordonnance d'AAO. La prévalence de l'utilisation des AAO a augmenté, passant de 222 pour 100 000 à 328 pour 100 000 entre 2003-2004 et 2015-2016. L'hormonothérapie pour le cancer du sein a représenté la classe d'AAO la plus communément utilisée (en hausse de 154 pour 100 000 à 231 pour 100 000). Nous avons observé une diminution par un facteur de 2,6 de la prévalence des agents alcoylants oraux et une augmentation par un facteur de 10,7 de la prévalence des inhibiteurs de protéine kinase au cours de la période de l'étude. Le coût total annuel des AAO ciblés pour tous les Manitobains atteints de cancer est passé de 1,8 millions de dollars à 19 millions de dollars. CONCLUSION: Nous avons observé une augmentation de la prévalence des AAO, et le coût des agents chimiothérapeutiques oraux ciblés est élevé. Nos constatations confirment la nécessité d'aborder ces médicaments coûteux dans les versions futures d'un programme de médicaments national.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Mouth Neoplasms , Outpatients , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/economics , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Costs and Cost Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Manitoba , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/drug therapy , Outpatients/psychology , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Prescription Drugs/economics , Prescription Drugs/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies
6.
Can J Public Health ; 108(3): e257-e264, 2017 Sep 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28910247

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study examines the socio-economic gradient in utilization and the risk factors associated with hospitalization for four pediatric ambulatory care sensitive conditions (dental conditions, asthma, gastroenteritis, and bacterial pneumonia). Dental conditions, where much care is provided by dentists and insurance coverage varies among different population segments, present special issues. METHODS: A population registry, provider registry, physician ambulatory claims, and hospital discharge abstracts from 28 398 children born in 2003-2006 in urban centres in Manitoba, Canada were the main data sources. Physician visits and hospitalizations were compared across neighbourhood income groupings using rank correlations and logistic regressions. RESULTS: Very strong relationships between neighbourhood income and utilization were highlighted. Additional variables - family on income assistance, mother's age at first birth, breastfeeding - helped predict the probability of hospitalization. Despite the complete insurance coverage (including visits to dentists and physicians and for hospitalizations) provided, receiving income assistance was associated with higher probabilities of hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: We found a socio-economic gradient in utilization for pediatric ambulatory care sensitive conditions, with higher rates of ambulatory visits and hospitalizations in the poorest neighbourhoods. Insurance coverage which varies between different segments of the population complicates matters. Providing funding for dental care for Manitobans on income assistance has not prevented physician visits or intensive treatment in high-cost facilities, specifically treatment under general anesthesia. When services from one type of provider (dentist) are not universally insured but those from another type (physician) are, using rates of hospitalization to indicate problems in the organization of care seems particularly difficult.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Pediatrics , Asthma/therapy , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Gastroenteritis/therapy , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Income/statistics & numerical data , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Manitoba , Pneumonia, Bacterial/therapy , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Stomatognathic Diseases/therapy
7.
Anesthesiology ; 125(4): 667-677, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27655179

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Animal studies demonstrate general anesthetic (GA) toxicity in the developing brain. Clinical reports raise concern, but the risk of GA exposure to neurodevelopment in children remains uncertain. METHODS: The authors undertook a retrospective matched cohort study comparing children less than 4 yr of age exposed to GA to those with no GA exposure. The authors used the Early Development Instrument (EDI), a 104-component questionnaire, encompassing five developmental domains, completed in kindergarten as the outcome measure. Mixed-effect logistic regression models generated EDI estimates for single versus multiple GA exposure and compared both single and multiple exposures by the age of 0 to 2 or 2 to 4 yr. Known sociodemographic and physical confounders were incorporated as covariates in the models. RESULTS: A total of 18,056 children were studied: 3,850 exposed to a single GA and 620 exposed to two or more GA, who were matched to 13,586 nonexposed children. In children less than 2 yr of age, there was no independent association between single or multiple GA exposure and EDI results. Paradoxically, single exposure between 2 and 4 yr of age was associated with deficits, most significant for communication/general knowledge (estimate, -0.7; 95% CI, -0.93 to -0.47; P < 0.0001) and language/cognition (estimate, -0.34; 95% CI, -0.52 to -0.16; P < 0.0001) domains. Multiple GA exposure at the age of 2 to 4 yr did not confer greater risk than single GA exposure. CONCLUSIONS: These findings refute the assumption that the earlier the GA exposure in children, the greater the likelihood of long-term neurocognitive risk. The authors cannot confirm an association between multiple GA exposure and increased risk of neurocognitive impairment, increasing the probability of confounding to explain the results.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...