Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2412898, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38780939

ABSTRACT

Importance: Despite increased use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) in joint arthroplasty over recent decades, current evidence for prophylactic use of ALBC to reduce risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is insufficient. Objective: To compare the rate of revision attributed to PJI following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using ALBC vs plain bone cement. Design, Setting, and Participants: This international cohort study used data from 14 national or regional joint arthroplasty registries in Australia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Italy, New Zealand, Norway, Romania, Sweden, Switzerland, the Netherlands, the UK, and the US. The study included primary TKAs for osteoarthritis registered from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020, and followed-up until December 31, 2021. Data analysis was performed from April to September 2023. Exposure: Primary TKA with ALBC vs plain bone cement. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was risk of 1-year revision for PJI. Using a distributed data network analysis method, data were harmonized, and a cumulative revision rate was calculated (1 - Kaplan-Meier), and Cox regression analyses were performed within the 10 registries using both cement types. A meta-analysis was then performed to combine all aggregated data and evaluate the risk of 1-year revision for PJI and all causes. Results: Among 2 168 924 TKAs included, 93% were performed with ALBC. Most TKAs were performed in female patients (59.5%) and patients aged 65 to 74 years (39.9%), fully cemented (92.2%), and in the 2015 to 2020 period (62.5%). All participating registries reported a cumulative 1-year revision rate for PJI of less than 1% following primary TKA with ALBC (range, 0.21%-0.80%) and with plain bone cement (range, 0.23%-0.70%). The meta-analyses based on adjusted Cox regression for 1 917 190 TKAs showed no statistically significant difference at 1 year in risk of revision for PJI (hazard rate ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.89-1.52) or for all causes (hazard rate ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.89-1.40) among TKAs performed with ALBC vs plain bone cement. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the risk of revision for PJI was similar between ALBC and plain bone cement following primary TKA. Any additional costs of ALBC and its relative value in reducing revision risk should be considered in the context of the overall health care delivery system.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Bone Cements , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Registries , Reoperation , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Bone Cements/therapeutic use , Female , Aged , Male , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Cohort Studies
2.
Acta Orthop ; 94: 416-425, 2023 08 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37565339

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) and systemic antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) have been used to reduce periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates. We investigated the use of ALBC and SAP in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This observational study is based on 2,971,357 primary TKAs reported in 2010-2020 to national/regional joint arthroplasty registries in Australia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Romania, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA. Aggregate-level data on trends and types of bone cement, antibiotic agents, and doses and duration of SAP used was extracted from participating registries. RESULTS: ALBC was used in 77% of the TKAs with variation ranging from 100% in Norway to 31% in the USA. Palacos R+G was the most common (62%) ALBC type used. The primary antibiotic used in ALBC was gentamicin (94%). Use of ALBC in combination with SAP was common practice (77%). Cefazolin was the most common (32%) SAP agent. The doses and duration of SAP used varied from one single preoperative dosage as standard practice in Bolzano, Italy (98%) to 1-day 4 doses in Norway (83% of the 40,709 TKAs reported to the Norwegian arthroplasty register). CONCLUSION: The proportion of ALBC usage in primary TKA varies internationally, with gentamicin being the most common antibiotic. ALBC in combination with SAP was common practice, with cefazolin the most common SAP agent. The type of ALBC and type, dose, and duration of SAP varied among participating countries.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Bone Cements/therapeutic use , Cefazolin , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Prosthesis-Related Infections/drug therapy , Gentamicins , North America , Europe , Oceania , Africa
3.
Microorganisms ; 11(1)2023 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36677407

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: PJIs following total hip and knee arthroplasty represent severe complications with broad implications, and with significant disability, morbidity, and mortality. To be able to provide correct and effective management of these cases, an accurate diagnosis is needed. Classically, acute PJIs are characterized by a preponderance of virulent microorganisms, and chronic PJIs are characterized by a preponderance of less-virulent pathogens like coagulase-negative staphylococci or Cutibacterium species. This paper aims to analyze if there are any changes in the causative microorganisms isolated in the last years, as well as to provide a subanalysis of the types of PJIs. METHODS: In this single-center study, we prospectively included all retrospectively consecutive collected data from patients aged over 18 years that were hospitalized from 2016 through 2022, and patients that underwent a joint arthroplasty revision surgery. A standardized diagnostic protocol was used in all cases, and the 2021 EBJIS definition criteria for PJIs was used. RESULTS: 114 patients were included in our analysis; of them, 67 were diagnosed with PJIs, 12 were acute/acute hematogenous, and 55 were chronic PJIs. 49 strains of gram-positive aerobic or microaerophilic cocci and 35 gram-negative aerobic bacilli were isolated. Overall, Staphylococcus aureus was the most common isolated pathogen, followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). All cases of acute/acute hematogenous PJIs were caused by gram-positive aerobic or microaerophilic cocci pathogens. Both Staphylococcus epidermidis and methicillin-resistant S. aureus were involved in 91.66% of the acute/acute hematogenous PJIs cases. 21.8% of the chronic PJIs cases were caused by pathogens belonging to the Enterobacterales group of bacteria, followed by the gram-negative nonfermenting bacilli group of bacteria, which were involved in 18.4% of the cases. 12 chronic cases were polymicrobial. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy in acute PJIs could be focused on the bacteria belonging to the gram-positive aerobic or microaerophilic cocci, but the results should be analyzed carefully, and the local resistance of the pathogens should be taken into consideration.

4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(27): e29823, 2022 Jul 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35801777

ABSTRACT

Beside the changes in the gut microbiota in context of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, the increased use of high-risk broad-spectrum antibiotics during the actual pandemic raises concerns about a possible increase of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs). We retrospectively analyzed 80 consecutive patients, with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and CDI. The mean length of hospitalization was 19.63 days. The mean time of the onset of the digestive symptoms related to CDI was 5.16 days. Patients with an onset of the digestive symptoms from hospital admission have a significantly lower median length in hospital stay. The recovered patients present a statistically significant decreased median age. coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cured patients present CDI symptoms much earlier than the deceased patients, when comparing the median days before the occurrence of any digestive symptoms regarding CDI. Among the patients that prior to their hospitalization for COVID-19 were exposed to antibiotics, 54.7% presented CDI digestive symptoms during their hospitalization and 65.6% had a severe or critical COVID-19 form. Although the incidence of CDI in the pandemic is lower compared to the period before the pandemic, the severity of cases and the death rate increased. In the actual setting clinicians need to be aware of possible CDI and SARS-CoV-2 co-infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections , Coinfection , Cross Infection , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/epidemiology , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Coinfection/drug therapy , Coinfection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
5.
J Endod ; 35(2): 153-9, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19166763

ABSTRACT

The new Apexum procedure (Apexum Ltd, Or-Yehuda, Israel) is based on a minimally invasive removal of periapical chronically inflamed tissues through a root canal access. Its goal is to enhance healing kinetics of periapical lesions. This clinical study was conducted to explore the safety and efficacy of this procedure. The Apexum procedure was applied, as a supplementary step, during conventional root canal treatment in 48 teeth with periapical lesions. Safety and efficacy were clinically and radiographically assessed and teeth of the Apexum-treated group were compared with 39 similar teeth treated by the same endodontic procedure with no additional intervention. No adverse events occurred in either the Apexum-treated or conventional treatment groups. Furthermore, healing kinetics was significantly enhanced in the Apexum-treated group (p < 0.005). At 3 and 6 months, 87% and 95% of the lesions in the Apexum-treated group, respectively, presented advanced or complete healing, whereas only 22% and 39% of the lesions in the conventional treatment group presented this degree of healing at 3 and 6 months, respectively.


Subject(s)
Periapical Periodontitis/surgery , Root Canal Therapy/instrumentation , Root Canal Therapy/methods , Adult , Dental Alloys , Dental High-Speed Equipment , Dental Pulp Necrosis/therapy , Equipment Design , Extravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Nickel , Pain, Postoperative , Periapical Periodontitis/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , Radiography , Single-Blind Method , Titanium , Wound Healing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...