Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am ; 36(1): 1-22, v, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17472872

ABSTRACT

Hospital-based malnutrition continues to be an important comorbidity affecting clinical outcomes. Knowledge of performing an appropriate nutrition assessment and implementing a rational nutrition therapy should be part of any patient's hospital plan of care. Familiarity with nutrition assessment scoring systems and nutrition assessment tools should be part of any gastroenterologist's expertise. Assessment of a patient's caloric and protein needs should be part of any hospital patient's clinical evaluation.


Subject(s)
Nutrition Assessment , Blood Proteins/metabolism , Humans , Malnutrition/diagnosis , Malnutrition/epidemiology , Malnutrition/therapy , Mass Screening , Nutrition Therapy , Nutritional Requirements , Nutritional Status , Risk Factors
2.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 101(9): 2003-7, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16968506

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Bispectral (BIS) monitoring provides an objective, non-invasive measure of the level of consciousness in sedated patients. BIS has been shown to lag behind the level of sedation during induction and emergence of sedation with propofol. In this study, we sought to determine whether BIS is a useful adjunctive maneuver to registered nurse-administered propofol sedation (NAPS) as measured by reductions in recovery time and doses of propofol administered. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of 102 outpatients presenting for colonoscopy was performed. BIS values were recorded continuously in all subjects. Patients were randomized to receive NAPS with BIS visible to nurse and endoscopist versus BIS invisible to nurse and endoscopist. In phase 1 (47 patients), the nurse and endoscopist team were instructed to consider BIS (when visible) as only adjunctive information with regard to titrating sedation. In phase 2 (55 patients), the nurse endoscopist team was instructed to use BIS as the primary endpoint for titration of sedation, and to target BIS to greater than 60 (60-70 is deep sedation). RESULTS: In phase 1, the mean (SD) BIS value from scope-in (SI) to scope-out (SO) for BIS was 59.3 (9.9) and was not different from controls at 59.9 (10.1; p= 0.82). The mean (SD) propofol dose (mg/min) was 15.8 (5.6) and 17.2 (6.2) for BIS and controls, respectively (p= 0.45). The mean (SD) recovery time with BIS visible in phase 1 was 20.6 min (5.5) versus 19.2 min (4.5) in controls (p= 0.34). In phase 2, the mean (SD) BIS from SI to SO in those randomized to have BIS visible was 64.1 (5.4) versus 63.1 (8.5) in controls (p= 0.58). The mean (SD) dose of propofol (mg/min) was 16.1 (11.2) and 16.4 (12.3) for BIS and control groups, respectively (p= 0.92). The mean (SD) recovery time in phase 2 with BIS visible was 18.7 (3.5) versus 20.1 (5.6) in controls (p= 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: BIS did not lead to reductions in mean propofol dose or recovery time when used as an adjunct to NAPS for colonoscopy, or when used as the primary target for sedation. No clinically important role for BIS monitoring as an adjunct to NAPS has yet been established.


Subject(s)
Colonoscopy , Conscious Sedation/nursing , Consciousness/physiology , Electroencephalography/methods , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Propofol/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Consciousness/drug effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL