Pre-Hospital Spinal Immobilization: Neurological Outcomes for Spinal Motion Restriction Versus Spinal Immobilization.

Introduction: New recommendations for emergency medical services spinal precautions limit long spinal board use to extrication purposes only and are to be removed immediately. Outcomes for spinal motion restriction against spinal immobilization were studied. Methods: A retrospective chart review of trauma patients was conducted over a six-month period at a level I trauma center. Injury severity details and neurologic assessments were collected on 277 patients. Results: Upon arrival, 25 (9.0%) patients had a spine board in place. Patients placed on spine boards were more likely to be moderately or severely injured [injury severity score (ISS) > 15: 36.0% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.001] and more likely to have neurological deficits documented by emergency medical services (EMS; 30.4% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.01) and the trauma team (29.2% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.02). Conclusions: This study suggested that the long spine board was being used properly for more critically injured patients. Further research is needed to compare neurological outcomes using a larger sample size and more consistent documentation.

Analysis of patients ≥65 with predominant cervical spine fractures: Issues of disposition and dysphagia.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine fractures occur in 2.6% to 4.7% of trauma patients aged 65 years or older. Mortality rates in this population ranges from 19% to 24%. A few studies have specifically looked at dysphagia in elderly patients with cervical spine injury. AIMS: The aim of this study is to evaluate dysphagia, disposition, and mortality in elderly patients with cervical spine injury. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Retrospective review at an the American College of Surgeons-verified level 1 trauma center. METHODS: Patients 65 years or older with cervical spine fracture, either isolated or in association with other minor injuries were included in the study. Data included demographics, injury details, neurologic deficits, dysphagia evaluation and treatment, hospitalization details, and outcomes. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Categorical and continuous data were analyzed using Chi-square analysis and one-way analysis of variance, respectively. RESULTS: Of 136 patients in this study, 2 (1.5%) had a sensory deficit alone, 4 (2.9%) had a motor deficit alone, and 4 (2.9%) had a combined sensory and motor deficit. Nearly one-third of patients (n = 43, 31.6%) underwent formal swallow evaluation, and 4 (2.9%) had a nasogastric tube or Dobhoff tube placed for enteral nutrition, whereas eight others (5.9%) had a gastrostomy tube or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placed. Most patients were discharged to a skilled nursing unit (n = 50, 36.8%), or to home or home with home health (n = 48, 35.3%). Seven patients (5.1%) died in the hospital, and eight more (5.9%) were transferred to hospice. CONCLUSION: Cervical spine injury in the elderly patient can lead to significant consequences, including dysphagia and need for skilled nursing care at discharge.

Pediatric Farm Injuries: Morbidity and Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Agriculture is an industry where family members often live and work on the same premises. This study evaluated injury patterns and outcomes in children from farm-related accidents. METHODS: A 10-year retrospective review of farm-accident related injuries was conducted of patients 17 years and younger. Data collected included demographics, injury mechanism, accident details, injury severity and patterns, treatments required, hospitalization details, and discharge disposition. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included; 58.5% were male and the mean age was 9.7 years. Median Injury Severity Score and Glasgow Coma Scale were 5 and 15, respectively. Accident mechanisms included animal-related (43.1%), fall (21.5%), and motor vehicle (21.5%). Soft tissue injuries, concussions and upper extremity fractures were the most common injuries observed (58.5%, 29.2%, and 26.2%, respectively). Twenty-six patients (40%) required surgical intervention. Mean hospital length of stay was 3.4 ± 4.7 days. The majority of patients were discharged to home (n = 62, 95.4%) and two patients suffered permanent disability. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, outcomes for this population were favorable, but additional measures to increase safety, such as fall prevention, animal handling, and driver safety training should be advocated.

Achieving endoscopic competency in a general surgery residency.

BACKGROUND: In 2006, the Residency Review Committee for Surgery increased the total number of required endoscopy cases for graduating residents. Our goal was to evaluate general surgery resident competency in endoscopy, focusing on quality measures. METHODS: A 9-year retrospective review was conducted of 29 residents. Total number of endoscopies performed throughout residency was recorded. Procedures performed as fifth-year residents with indirect supervision were evaluated for quality measures. RESULTS: An average of 76 esophagogastroduodenoscopies and 147 colonoscopies were performed through their first 4 years of residency. Chief residents performed an average of 16 esophagogastroduodenoscopies and 22 colonoscopies. Of colonoscopies performed during their fifth year, 191 were performed while the resident had only indirect supervision. During these cases, cecal intubation was achieved in 90.6% of cases, an average of .48 polyps were identified, and average scope withdrawal time was 13.4 ± 7.1 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that surgery residents achieve competency in colonoscopy before performing 140 colonoscopies, supporting the concept that surgery residencies can function as an excellent training ground for endoscopy.

Do medical student's surgical examination scores correlate with performance markers?

BACKGROUND: Some medical school training consists of oral examinations. METHODS: We conducted a 9-year review of third-year medical student examinations including oral examinations, National Board of Medical Examiners Surgery Subject Examination (SSE, ie, shelf), and United States Medical Licensing Examinations Step 1 and Step 2. RESULTS: Step 1 showed a moderate to strong association with Period 1 orals (Somers' D = .297, P < .001), but not Period 2 orals (Somers' D = .048, P = .053). Period 1 orals (percentage) had a strong association with SSE (Somers' D = .356, P < .001) and Step 2 (Somers' D = .368, P < .001). Period 2 orals (pass/fail) suggested a positive, but not statistically significant, association with SSE (Somers' D = .334, P = .085) and Step 2 (Somers' D = .370, P = .055). Step 1 shows a strong association with SSE (Somers' D = .490, P < .001). SSE showed a strong association with Step 2 (Somers' D = .506, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Orals can be used to identify students who may have difficulty passing the SSE. Step 1 can be used to identify students at risk of poor performance on the SSE, and SSE can be used to identify students at risk for poor performance on Step 2.

Estimation of burn depth at burn centers in the United States: a survey.

Accurate burn depth estimation remains one of the foundations of optimal burn care. The method by which burn depth is determined has traditionally been clinical examination alone. This continues to hold true in the United States, despite a plethora of literature supporting the use of more accurate modalities such as laser Doppler imaging (LDI). LDI has widespread use in burn centers in the United Kingdom and around the world. Thus, the reason for a lack of use in U.S. burn centers remains elusive. A survey of U.S. burn center directors was conducted to assess their current practices and attitudes with regard to burn depth estimation at U.S. burn centers in an effort to answer this question. Surveys were returned from 68 burn center directors (49% response rate). All respondents reported using clinical examination in their current practice for the daily evaluation of acute burns, with a biopsy being the next most commonly used modality. The most preferred modality was also clinical examination (60%), followed by LDI (6%) and biopsy (4%). The top three modalities ranked as "most promising" for daily use were clinical examination, LDI, and noncontact/high-frequency ultrasound. Directors identified the top three limitations to the use of new technology as cost (72%), availability (63%), and lack of support by evidence to date (35%). Future studies may need to focus on overcoming these perceived limitations before the widespread use of LDI or other new modalities will be realized at burn centers in the United States.

Evaluation of chest tube administration of tissue plasminogen activator to treat retained hemothorax.

BACKGROUND: When retained hemothorax occurs, video-assisted thoracoscopy or thoracotomy is performed, but recently, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) has been used. This study evaluated intrapleural tPA use for retained traumatic hemothoraces. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of trauma patients treated with intrapleural tPA for retained hemothorax. Data included demographics, past medical and surgical histories, injury details, treatment details, and outcomes. RESULTS: Seven patients (median age = 47 years, male = 6, blunt trauma = 6) met study criteria. All patients received a chest tube. Six patients later received computed tomography-guided drains for tPA infusion. Number of tPA treatments per patient varied from 1 to 5. Median total tPA dosage was 24 mg. Median time from injury to chest tube placement was 11 days and from chest tube placement to first tPA treatment was 4 days. No patients required a video-assisted thoracoscopy; however, 1 patient required thoracotomy. There were no deaths or bleeding complications attributed to intrapleural tPA. CONCLUSION: Although future studies are needed to identify optimum treatment guidelines, intrapleural tPA appears to be a safe and efficacious treatment option.