Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 2217, 2024 01 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38278853

ABSTRACT

Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) remains a challenging diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Cepheid, USA) for rapid diagnosis of EPTB in Tunisia. Eight hundred and forty-seven extrapulmonary samples collected from 2017 to 2021, were subjected to Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra. Microscopy and culture were performed for all the specimens. The accuracy of Xpert Ultra was evaluated in comparison to the culture. Xpert Ultra diagnosed EPTB with a global sensitivity of 80.66% (74.3-85.75) and specificity of 70.87% (67.31-74.20). The molecular test was most accurate when performed in cerebrospinal fluids, bones and joints and cutaneous specimens showing a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity ranging from 70.60 to 91.11%. In lymph node samples comprising aspirates and biopsies, the sensitivity of Xpert Ultra was high 87.50% (77.23-93.53), however, the specificity was 51.08% (44.67-57.46). For pleural samples, the Xpert Ultra sensitivity was 77.50% (68.34-84.68) ranging from 71.43 to 80% in pleural biopsies and fluids respectively. The specificity in all pleural specimens was 79.56% (74.40-83.91). Xpert Ultra showed promise in the diagnosis of EPTB. The performances varied according to the site of the disease. The test may be more valuable if used in combination with other diagnostic modalities.


Subject(s)
Antibiotics, Antitubercular , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis, Extrapulmonary , Tuberculosis , Humans , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Tunisia , Sensitivity and Specificity , Antibiotics, Antitubercular/pharmacology , Antibiotics, Antitubercular/therapeutic use
2.
Res Microbiol ; 172(3): 103816, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33737037

ABSTRACT

Rapid detection of the second-line drug (SLD) resistant tuberculosis (TB) strains is challenging to prescribe an immediate adequate treatment and limit the transmission of SLD resistant strains. The study aimed to evaluate the performance of GenoType MTBDRsl V2.0 compared to phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST:MGIT960) to detect resistance to SLD of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) isolates in Tunisia, between May 2015 and December 2019. As a matter of fact, 103 rifampicin-resistant and multidrug-resistant MTB strains were included. Discrepancies between pDST and MTBDRsl were solved by whole genome sequencing. Compared to pDST, MTBDRsl V2.0 showed a sensitivity of 92.8% (68.5%-98.7%) in detecting resistance to fluoroquinolones. As for second-line injectable drugs, it presented a sensitivity of 80.0% (49.0%-94.3%). MTBDRsl had sensitivities of 100.0% (67.5%-100.0%), 75.0% (40.9%-92.8%) and 100.0% (60.9%-100.0%) respectively for kanamycin, capreomycin and amikacin. The specificity was 100.0% for all the drugs evaluated. As for diagnosing XDR-TB, it had a sensitivity of 57.1% (25.0%-84.1%) and a specificity of 100.0% (96.1%-100.0%). MTBDRsl V2.0 showed a high performance in detecting SLD resistance with a short turnaround time compared with pDST, which made it possible to start an early treatment and to maintain a low prevalence of SLD resistance and XDR-TB in Tunisia.


Subject(s)
Antibiotics, Antitubercular/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/instrumentation , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Genotype , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/classification , Rifampin/pharmacology , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/microbiology , Tunisia , Whole Genome Sequencing , Young Adult
3.
Afr Health Sci ; 21(3): 985-989, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35222558

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A rapid accurate identification of Mycobacterium bovis is essential for surveillance purposes. OBJECTIVES: A PCR pncA-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) and a multiplex PCR based on the detection of 3 regions of difference (RD-PCR): RD9, RD4 and RD1 were evaluated for the identification of M. bovis in lymph nodes cultures, in Tunisia, during 2013-2015. METHODS: Eighty-two M. tuberculosis complex strains were identified using the biochemical tests, GenoType MTBC assay, PCR pncA-RFLP and RD-PCR. RESULTS: The PCR pncA-RFLP showed that 54 M. bovis strains, identified by GenoType MTBC, had a mutation at position 169 of pncA gene. Twenty-eight strains did not show any mutation at this position 27 M. tuberculosis isolates and one M. caprae. The PCR pncA-RFLP had a sensitivity of 100.0% (95%CI: 93.3 -100.0) and a specificity of 100.0% (95%CI: 87.9-100.0) for identifying M. bovis. The RD-PCR showed that all M. bovis strains had the RD9 and RD4 deleted but presented RD1. RD-PCR also presented high sensitivity and specificity in detecting M. bovis strains (100.0%). CONCLUSIONS: PCR pncA-RFLP and RD-PCR represent very accurate and rapid tools to identify M. bovis. They can be easily implemented in each laboratory due to their low cost and easy use.


Subject(s)
Mycobacterium bovis , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Genomics , Humans , Lymph Nodes , Mycobacterium bovis/genetics , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length
4.
Int J Mycobacteriol ; 1(1): 34-9, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26786947

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of molecular techniques is a major improvement for the rapid routine detection and control of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). MATERIALS: In this study, the multiplex allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (MAS-PCR) was developed to simultaneously detect the most frequent mutations associated with isoniazid (INH) and rifampin (RIF) resistance in a single assay. RESULTS: The assay was tested with 53 clinical isolates. Among them, 27 were MDR strains, 17 were mono-resistant to INH, one was mono-resistant to RIF, and eight were susceptible. The MAS-PCR assay showed a specificity of 100% in detecting drug resistance. An equivalent sensitivity of 92.6% in detecting MDR and RIF-resistance was found. The sensitivity for the detection of INH-resistance was 88.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The MAS-PCR assay was a simple and rapid method for detecting the INH and RIF-resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MT) clinical strains. It is also easy to perform and to interpret. The assay is inexpensive and a less-demanding technique.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...