Color Doppler ultrasound versus CT angiography for DIEP flap planning: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Identifying relevant perforators is crucial in planning a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. Color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) has gained popularity for localizing perforators; however, current evidence on its efficiency is still inconclusive. This study aimed to compare the efficiency of CDU with that of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in localizing and selecting the relevant perforators. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 60 patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction (uni- or bilateral) were randomly assigned to the CDU group (i.e., CDU was performed to map and select the relevant perforators preoperatively) or the CTA+CDU group (i.e., mapping was based on CTA and supplemented by CDU). CDU was performed by the same surgeon with a well-defined sonography experience from our previous study. The reference XY coordinates of the dissected perforators were measured intraoperatively, and deviations from preoperatively deducted coordinates were calculated (ΔCDU or ΔCTA+CDU). The flaps were categorized according to the number of dissected perforators, and adherence to the preoperative strategy was evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 22 patients (30 flaps) in the CTA+CDU group and 27 (39 flaps) patients in the CDU group were evaluated. The average ΔCDU (0.6 cm) was significantly lower than the average ΔCTA+CDU (1.0 cm) (p < 0.001). Adherence to the mapping-based dissection strategy was higher in the CDU group; however, the difference was insignificant (p = 0.092). CONCLUSION: CDU is not inferior to CTA + CDU in localizing and selecting relevant DIEA perforators. Therefore, CDU mapping is a possible complementary or substitute modality for CTA mapping.

Use of the Cephalic Vein in DIEP Breast Reconstruction Does Not Increase Risk of Lymphedema of the Ipsilateral Arm.

SUMMARY: Flap failure is a rare but devastating complication in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstructions. Common causes of partial or complete flap failure are related to venous congestion. Although the cephalic vein is usually a safe and reliable recipient vein for additional venous outflow, there is a hypothesized risk of donor-arm lymphedema secondary to lymphatic vessel damage in the vicinity of the cephalic vein or related to scarring and reduced venous backflow of the arm. The aim was to assess whether the cephalic vein as an additional recipient vessel, by means of the superficial inferior epigastric vein in DIEP flap breast reconstruction, was associated with long-term volume changes of the arm and/or symptoms of lymphedema. Arm volume was assessed preoperatively in patients scheduled to undergo unilateral delayed DIEP flap breast reconstruction at Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, between 2001 and 2007. Long-term postoperative assessments were performed in 2015 to 2016. Water displacement and circumferential measurement were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively by the same lymphedema therapists. Patients were divided into two groups: DIEP reconstruction with the cephalic vein or without. Fifty-four patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and completed the study, with a mean follow-up time of 136 months. There was no increased occurrence of lymphedema in the group undergoing DIEP flap reconstruction with the cephalic vein as extra venous drainage, based on an analysis of change from baseline in arm volume difference.This study shows that the cephalic vein can be used for secondary venous outflow in DIEP breast reconstruction without long-term risk of ipsilateral arm volume increase or symptoms of lymphedema. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Surgeon-conducted color Doppler ultrasound deep inferior epigastric artery perforator mapping: A cohort study and learning curve assessment.

BACKGROUND: Perforator mapping using diagnostic methods facilitates deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap planning. Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is a well-proven tool for perforator mapping. However, the benefits of color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) are as follows: 1) CDU involves dynamic real-time examination and 2) does not use radiation. Comparing the accuracies of both methods in a cohort of patients, this study aimed to evaluate the learning curve of surgeon-conducted CDU perforator mapping. METHODS: Twenty patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction were enrolled in a cohort study. All patients underwent CTA perforator mapping preoperatively. XY coordinates of significant perforators were subtracted by a radiologist. A single surgeon (sonographer) with minimal experience with CDU performed CDU perforator mapping, including XY coordinates subtraction. The sonographer was blinded to the CTA data. The reference coordinates of dissected perforators were measured during surgery. Deviations from reference coordinates for both methods were compared, and CDU mapping learning curve was assessed using Joinpoint Regression. RESULTS: We included 20 women (32 DIEP flaps and 59 dissected perforators). The mean deviation between mapped and reference coordinates was 1.00 (0.50-1.12) cm for CDU and 0.71 (0.50-1.12) cm for CTA. The learning curve of CDU mapping showed the breaking point after the seventh patient (≈ 21 localized perforators). After the breaking point, no significant differences between the deviations of both methods were found (p = 0.980). CONCLUSION: A limited number of examinations were needed for the surgeon to learn CDU DIEA perforator mapping with accuracy similar to that of CTA mapping.

Abdominoplasty - aesthetic and curative procedure.

Excess of skin and fat in lower abdomen can be aesthetic and, in some patients, also medical problem. This article gives basic information about different types of abdominoplasty, the way how it is performed, about recovery time, risks and complications. Several patients pictures demonstrate pre and postoperative results. Abdominoplasty belongs to group of body contouring procedures and it is one of the most common aesthetic operations. Because of extension of the surgical field and the length of operation, there are possible risks of systemic complications and also complication with local healing. Under the specific condition, this operation can be covered by public health care resources. Keywords: abdominoplasty, miniabdominoplasty, floating abdominoplasty, circumferential body lift.

A Comprehensive In Vitro Comparison of Preparation Techniques for Fat Grafting.

BACKGROUND: Lipomodeling is a technique that uses the patient's own fat for tissue regeneration and augmentation. The extent of regenerative effect is reported to be determined by the numbers of adipose-derived stem cells and the viability of cells in processed adipose tissue which, together with other factors, influence the degree of graft retention. This study addresses whether differences exist in properties of fat graft obtained by three commonly used techniques. METHODS: Adipose tissue harvested from the hypogastric regions of 14 patients was processed by decantation, centrifugation, and membrane-based tissue filtration. The morphology of each preparation was assessed by electron microscopy and overall cell viability was assessed by live/dead assay. The number of adipose-derived stem cells was determined and their stem cell character was assessed by the presence of cell surface molecules (i.e., CD105, CD90, CD31, and CD45) and by their capacity to differentiate into adipogenic and osteogenic lineages. RESULTS: First, morphologies of processed fat samples obtained by individual procedures differed, but no preparation caused obvious damage to cellular or acellular components. Second, although the highest numbers of adipose-derived stem cells were contained in the upper fraction of centrifuged lipoaspirates, the difference between preparations was marginal. Third, the maximal concentration of adipose fraction (removal of watery component) of lipoaspirate was achieved by membrane-based tissue filtration. Finally, no significant differences in overall viability were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Properties of processed lipoaspirate were influenced by the preparation procedure. However, the differences were not dramatic; both centrifugation and membrane-based filtration are methods of choice whose selection depends on other criteria (e.g., practicality) for individual surgical settings.

Bilateral breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps: 4 years' experience.

UNLABELLED: Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy without reconstruction is not accepted by the majority of patients. Successful reconstruction is therefore a mandatory condition for prophylactic mastectomy. Of the many options for autologous breast reconstruction, the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap best meets requirements for bilateral reconstruction in selected patients. The goal of this study is to verify the feasibility of the procedure in our conditions and to find out how it is accepted by patients. We present 55 consecutive patients who were scheduled for bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction during a 4-year period. We reviewed medical charts, performed clinical assessments and processed anonymous questionnaires. There were 77 immediate and 33 delayed breast reconstructions. There was 100% flap survival and no microanastomoses revisions. In 11 patients (10%) the surgeon preferred to convert the DIEP into a mini transverse rectus abdominis muscle (miniTRAM) flap in order to provide adequate blood supply. COMPLICATIONS: revision for haematoma under the flap in four patients (7.2%), excessive blood loss in four patients (7.2%) and partial mastectomy skin flap necrosis in 10 immediate breast reconstructions (12.9%). Patients' evaluation of the aesthetic result was good or excellent in 96.2% of cases. In 33.9% of patients the postoperative quality of life was considered unchanged and 50.9% of them it even improved. The DIEP flap is recommended for bilateral breast reconstruction. Occasional conversion into a miniTRAM flap can increase the total flap survival rate. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and DIEP flap reconstruction are very well accepted by patients.

Primary vein grafting in treatment of ring avulsion injuries: a 5-year prospective study.

Out of 262 hands with total finger amputations treated by replantation of finger/fingers from January 2001 until January 2006, there were only 6 cases of type III ring avulsion injuries, all of which were replanted. Radical resection of the damaged part of the artery with primary vein grafting was used in each case; only 1 artery and 2 veins were anastomosed for each finger. The survival rate was 100%. Mean total active motion was 195 degrees (ranging from 175 degrees to 220 degrees ). Mean 2-point discrimination was 8.6 mm static (ranging from 4 to 11 mm) and 6.2 mm moving (ranging from 3 to 9 mm), and mean grip strength was 37.4 kg. We believe that liberal resection of the "zone of contusion" of vessels and primary vein grafting for arterial repair can improve the overall survival rate of replantation in type III ring avulsion injuries, and replantation can be attempted in majority of the cases; good hand function can be expected.