Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 1695, 2024 02 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38336797

ABSTRACT

There is evidence that humans can survive a direct lightning strike to the head. Our question is: could water (rain) on the skin contribute to an increase in the survival rate? We measure the influence of rain during high-energy direct lightning strikes on a realistic three-compartment human head phantom. We find a lower number of perforations and eroded areas near the lightning strike impact points on the head phantom when rain was applied compared to no rain. Current amplitudes in the brain were lower with rain compared to no rain before a fully formed flashover. We conclude that rain on the scalp potentially contributes to the survival rate of 70-90% due to: (1) lower current exposition in the brain before a fully formed flashover, and (2) reduced mechanical and thermal damage.


Subject(s)
Lightning Injuries , Humans , Brain , Scalp , Phantoms, Imaging , Rain
2.
PLoS One ; 14(9): e0223133, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31557252

ABSTRACT

Direct lightning strikes to the human head can lead to various effects, ranging from burnings to death. The biological and physical mechanisms of a direct lightning strike in the human head are not well understood. The aim of this paper is to design an experimental setup to measure the spatial and temporal current distribution during a direct lightning strike to physical head phantoms to establish normative values for personal lightning protection equipment design and testing. We created head phantoms made of agarose, replicating the geometric and dielectric properties of scalp, skull, and intracranial volume. The bases of the three compartments were galvanically contacted via copper electrodes to measure the current per compartment. We used pulse generators to apply aperiodic voltage and current signals that modelled lightning components. Our experiments indicated that the scalp compartment was exposed to the current with a fraction of 80-90%. The brain and skull compartments were exposed between 6-13% and 3-6% of the total measured current respectively. In case of a flashover, most of the current (98-99%) flowed through the discharge channel. Unlike previous theoretical estimates and measurements in technical setups, we observed considerably longer times for the flashover to build up. In our experiments, the time to build up a fully formed flashover varied from approximately 30-700 µs. The observed current patterns in cases without and with flashover provided information on regions of possible damage in the human head. Consequently, we identified the phenomenon of a flashover as a potential mechanism for humans to survive a lightning strike. Our measured current distributions and amplitudes formed the base for normative values, which can be used in later experimental investigations regarding the possibilities of individual lightning protection equipment for humans.


Subject(s)
Craniocerebral Trauma/prevention & control , Electricity , Head , Lightning Injuries/prevention & control , Lightning , Craniocerebral Trauma/etiology , Humans , Models, Anatomic , Spatio-Temporal Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...