Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Spinal Disord Tech ; 26(2): 68-73, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21964455

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Comparison of extravasations in fractured cadaver vertebrae augmented with commercial low-viscosity versus high-viscosity cements. OBJECTIVE: Use of high-resolution, 3-dimensional (3D) imaging to test the hypothesis that high-viscosity cements can reduce the type and severity of extravasations after vertebral augmentation procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cement extravasations are one of the primary complications of vertebral augmentation procedures. There is some evidence that high-viscosity cements might reduce extravasations, but additional data are needed to confirm the early findings. METHODS: A range of vertebral fractures were created in fresh human cadavers. One group was then augmented with a low-viscosity polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-based cement and the other group injected with high-viscosity PMMA-based cement. High-resolution computerized tomography exams were obtained, and extravasations were assessed using 3D volume renderings. The type and severity of extravasations were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The proportion of vertebrae with any type of extravasation through the posterior wall to the spinal canal, into small vessels laterally or anteriorly, through the endplates, or anywhere around the body was not significantly different between the high-viscosity and low-viscosity groups. There was significantly less severe extravasation through the endplates (P=0.02), and a trend toward less severe extravasation through vessels (P=0.06) with the high versus low-viscosity cements. CONCLUSIONS: In agreement with previous research, high-viscosity PMMA-based cement may help to reduce the more severe forms of extravasations after vertebral augmentation procedures in newly fractured vertebrae.


Subject(s)
Bone Cements/chemistry , Bone Cements/standards , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cadaver , Female , Humans , Male , Polymethyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Polymethyl Methacrylate/standards , Radiography , Spinal Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Vertebroplasty/methods , Vertebroplasty/standards , Viscosity
2.
Spine J ; 10(12): 1118-27, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21094472

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) have been in use since the mid-1980s. A mixture of liquid monomer and powder is introduced through a needle into one or both pedicles, and it polymerizes within the vertebral body in an exothermic chemical reaction. The interaction between cement and the fractured vertebral body determines whether and how the cement stabilizes the fragments, alters morphology, and extravasates. The cement is intended to remain within the vertebral body. However, some studies have reported cement leakage in more than 80% of the procedures. Although cement leakage can have no or minimal clinical consequences, adverse events, such as paraplegia, spinal cord and nerve root compression, cement pulmonary embolisms, or death, can occur. The details of how the cement infiltrates a vertebral body or extravasates out of the body are poorly understood and may help to identify strategies to reduce complications and improve clinical efficacy. PURPOSE: Apply novel techniques to demonstrate the cement spread inside vertebrae as well as the points and pattern of cement extravastation. STUDY DESIGN: Ex vivo assessment of vertebral augmentation procedures. METHODS: Vertebrae from six fresh whole human cadaver spines were used to create 24 specimens of three vertebrae each. The specimens were placed in a pneumatic testing system, designed to create controlled anterior wedge compression fractures. Unipedicular augmentation was performed on the central vertebra of 24 specimens using polymethylmethacrylate/barium sulfate Vertebroplastic cements (DePuy Spine, Raynham, MA, USA). The volume of cement injected into each vertebra was recorded. Fine-cut computed tomography (CT) scans of all segments were obtained (Brilliance 64; Philips Medical Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Using multiplanar reconstructions and volume compositing three-dimensional imaging (Osirix, www.osirix-viewer.com), each specimen was carefully assessed for cement extravasation. Specimens were then immersed in a 50% sodium hypochlorite solution until all overlying soft tissues were removed, leaving the bone and cement intact. The specimens were dried and visually examined and photographed to assess cement extravasation and fracture patterns. Specimens were cut in the axial or sagittal plains to assess the gross morphology of cement infiltration and extravasation. Finally, 25-mm block sections were removed from selected specimens and imaged at 14-µm resolution using a GE Locus-SP micro-CT system (GE Healthcare, London, Ontario, Canada). RESULTS: Infiltration was characterized by an intimate capture of trabecular bone within the cement, forming an irregular border at the perimeter of the cement that is determined by the morphology of the trabeculae and marrow spaces. Extravasation of the cement was assessed as "any" if any small or large amount of extravastation was detected and was also assessed as severe if a large amount of extravasation was found. Out of the 23 levels studied, some extravasation was visibly apparent in all levels. A wide spectrum of filling patterns, leakage points, and interdigitation of the cement was observed and appeared to be determined by the interaction of the cement with the trabecular morphology. The results support the fact that the cement generally advances through the vertebrae with relatively regular and easily identifiable borders. CONCLUSIONS: Using a cadaver VCF model, this study demonstrated the exact filling and extravastation patterns of bone cement inside and out of fractured vertebrae. These data enhance our understanding of the vertebral augmentation and extravastation mechanics.


Subject(s)
Bone Cements/adverse effects , Extravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials/classification , Fractures, Compression/surgery , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Spine/surgery , Vertebroplasty/methods , Bone Cements/therapeutic use , Humans , Radiography , Spinal Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Spine/diagnostic imaging
3.
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc ; 100(4): 270-5, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20660878

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treatment modalities for acute Achilles tendon rupture can be divided into operative and nonoperative. The main concern with nonoperative treatment is the high incidence of repeated ruptures; operative treatment is associated with risk of infection, sural nerve injury, and wound-healing sequelae. We assessed our experience with a percutaneous operative approach for treating acute Achilles tendon rupture. METHODS: The outcomes of percutaneous surgery in 29 patients (25 men; age range, 24-58 years) who underwent percutaneous surgery for Achilles tendon rupture between 1997 and 2004 were retrospectively evaluated. Their demographic data, subjective and objective evaluation findings, and isokinetic evaluation results were retrieved, and they were assessed with the modified Boyden score and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale. RESULTS: All 29 patients demonstrated good functional outcome, with no- to mild-limitations in recreational activities and high patient satisfaction. Mean follow-up was 31.8 months. Changes in ankle range of motion in the operated leg were minimal. Strength and power testing revealed a significant difference at 90 degrees /sec for plantarflexion power between the injured and healthy legs but no difference at 30 degrees and 240 degrees /sec or in dorsiflexion. The mean modified Boyden score was 74.3, and the mean Ankle-Hindfoot Scale score was 94.5. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous surgery for Achilles tendon rupture is easily executed and has excellent functional results and low complication rates. It is an appealing alternative to either nonoperative or open surgery treatments.


Subject(s)
Achilles Tendon/injuries , Achilles Tendon/surgery , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Adult , Ankle Joint/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle Strength/physiology , Pain Measurement , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Complications , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Recovery of Function/physiology , Retrospective Studies , Rupture/surgery , Treatment Outcome
4.
Spine J ; 10(8): 704-7, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20650408

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Occipitocervical injuries (OCIs) are generally not common in blunt trauma victims, but autopsy studies of blunt trauma fatalities consistently report a high prevalence of these injuries. New computed tomography (CT)-based quantitative criteria have recently been developed for use in assessing the occipitocervical spine. The efficacy of these new criteria for detecting OCI would be supported if the high prevalence of OCI in blunt trauma fatalities can also be detected using these objective CT-based criteria. PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that the prevalence of OCI in blunt trauma fatalities, determined using objective CT-based measurements and reliable reference data, will be similar to the prevalence reported in prior autopsy studies. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective assessment of the CT examinations of blunt trauma fatalities at a Level 1 trauma center. PATIENT SAMPLE: Seventy-four consecutive patients who died within 21 days of blunt trauma and had a CT examination of the cervical spine. OUTCOME MEASURES: Quantitative measurements from CT examinations of the occiput-C1 and C1-C2 levels. METHODS: Measurements were made on a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) from the CT images that were originally used for diagnosis and also using imaging software that allowed for precisely reoriented slices that correct for variations in the alignment of the upper cervical spine. The prevalence of abnormal measurements found by each method and the interobserver reliability of the measurements were assessed. RESULTS: At least one abnormal measurement was found in 50% of cases based on measurements made on the PACS, and in 34% of cases using measurements from carefully reoriented images. At least three abnormal measurements were found in 22% and 14% of patients, respectively. Only one of the patients had been diagnosed as having an OCI before death. Interobserver reliability measurements of more than 80% were found for most measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Using precise CT-based measurements and reliable reference data for diagnosis of occipitocervical dissociative injuries, the prevalence of injuries in severely injured blunt trauma patients was close to the levels reported in prior autopsy studies (approximately 30%). This supports that with careful measurements, both soft- and hard-tissue OCI can be detected by CT. This study is limited by the fact that a gold standard was not available to confirm the injuries.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Occipital Bone/diagnostic imaging , Occipital Bone/injuries , Spinal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Reference Values , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Trauma Centers
5.
Spine J ; 10(3): 219-29, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20207332

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: High-speed computed tomography (CT) exams have replaced traditional radiographs for assessment of cervical spine injuries in many emergency departments. Recent evidence demonstrates that even subtle displacements can indicate significant upper cervical spine injuries. Many different anatomical measurements have been described in the upper cervical spine to date, most of them based on X-ray. The range of anatomical relationships that exist in an uninjured population must be known to reliably detect abnormal relations. The measurements with the lowest normal variation are likely to be most useful in detecting injuries. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the normal quantitative anatomical relationships as well as the threshold measurements most likely to detect injury in the upper cervical spine. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective anatomical case review. PATIENT SAMPLE: Seventy-six thin-sliced cervical CT scans randomly selected from a trauma population, all negative for injury in the cervical spine. METHODS: Forty-two different anatomical measurements were made of the upper cervical spine. These included traditional historical measurements and other detailed dimensions to characterize occipitocervical (OC) and atlantoaxial (AA) joint relationships. RESULTS: After review of all the anatomical measurements performed in the upper cervical spine, direct measurements of the joint space had the least variation. The mean OC joint space was 0.6mm, with an upper 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1mm at the most anterior or posterior aspects of the joints. This was true for both sagittal and coronal measurements. The mean AA joint space was 0.6mm, with an upper 95% CI of 1.2mm at the lateral aspect of the joint on the coronal image only. The midsagittal structures demonstrated significantly higher standard deviation and variability. CONCLUSIONS: These results revealed consistently narrow joint spaces and left-right symmetry in the upper cervical spine joints that do not vary according to demographics. There was distinctly greater consistency in the coronal plane, which enabled more precise diagnostic measurement and side-to-side comparison of measurements. This precision will enable more accurate identification of abnormal scans, which should prompt consideration for additional workup. Thus, better understanding of these relationships may enable earlier detection of subtle craniocervical dissociative injuries based on CT scan data. This is important, because the only evidence of a severe injury on CT can be subtle misalignment.


Subject(s)
Atlanto-Axial Joint/diagnostic imaging , Atlanto-Occipital Joint/diagnostic imaging , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Injuries/diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Cervical Vertebrae/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Range of Motion, Articular , Reference Values , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Injuries/diagnostic imaging
6.
J Trauma ; 69(4): 889-95, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20130489

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The ability to detect damage to the intervertebral structures is critical in the management of patients after blunt trauma. A practical and inexpensive method to identify severe structural damage not clearly seen on computed tomography would be of benefit. The objective of this study was to assess whether ligamentous injury in the subaxial cervical spine can be reliably detected by analysis of lateral radiographs taken with and without axial traction. METHODS: Twelve fresh, whole, postrigor-mortis cadavers were used for this study. Lateral cervical spine radiographs were obtained during the application of 0 N, 89 N, and 178 N of axial traction applied to the head. Progressive incremental sectioning of posterior structures was then performed at C4-C5 with traction imaging repeated after each intervention. Intervertebral distraction was analyzed using computer-assisted software. RESULTS: Almost imperceptible intervertebral separation was found when traction was applied to intact spines. In the subaxial cervical spine, the average posterior disc height consistently increased under traction in severely injured spines. The average disc height increase was 14% of the C4 upper endplate width, compared with an average of 2% in the noninjured spines. A change of more than 5% in posterior disc height under traction was above the 95% confidence interval for intact spines, with sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 80%. Applied force of 89 N (20 lb) was sufficient to demonstrate injury. The combination of assessing alignment and distraction under traction increased both the sensitivity and specificity to nearly 100%. CONCLUSION: This study supports further clinical investigations to determine whether low-level axial traction may be a useful adjunct for detecting unstable subaxial cervical spine injuries in an acute setting.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Fluoroscopy , Intervertebral Disc/injuries , Joint Instability/diagnostic imaging , Ligaments, Articular/injuries , Spinal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Traction , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cervical Vertebrae/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Intervertebral Disc/diagnostic imaging , Intervertebral Disc/physiopathology , Joint Instability/physiopathology , Ligaments, Articular/diagnostic imaging , Ligaments, Articular/physiopathology , Male , Range of Motion, Articular , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spinal Injuries/physiopathology
7.
J Trauma ; 69(2): 447-50, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20093981

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cervical collars are applied to millions of trauma victims with the intent of protecting against secondary spine injuries. Adverse clinical outcomes during the management of trauma patients led to the hypothesis that extrication collars may be harmful in some cases. The literature provides indirect support for this observation. The purpose of this study was to directly evaluate cervical biomechanics after application of a cervical collar in the presence of severe neck injury. METHODS: Cranial-caudal displacements in the upper cervical spine were measured in cadavers from images taken before and after application of collars following creation of an unstable upper cervical spine injury. RESULTS: In the presence of severe injury, collar application resulted in 7.3 mm +/- 4.0 mm of separation between C1 and C2 in a cadaver model. In general, collars had the effect of pushing the head away from the shoulders. CONCLUSIONS: This study was consistent with previous evidence that extrication collars can result in abnormal distraction within the upper cervical spine in the presence of a severe injury. These observations support the need to prioritize additional research to better understand the risks and benefits of cervical stabilization methods and to determine whether improved stabilization methods can help to avoid potentially harmful displacements between vertebrae.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Immobilization/instrumentation , Neck Injuries/etiology , Orthotic Devices/adverse effects , Spinal Injuries/etiology , Spinal Injuries/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cadaver , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Biological , Neck Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Neck Injuries/therapy , Patient Transfer/methods , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Spinal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...