The diagnostic accuracy of faecal calprotectin and small bowel capsule endoscopy and their correlation in suspected isolated small bowel Crohn's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Faecal calprotectin (FC) is less accurate at identifying inflammation in the small bowel than in the colon. Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is a useful tool to detect small bowel inflammation. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of FC and SBCE and their correlation in patients with suspected isolated small bowel Crohn's disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was performed as a prospective single centre study including patients attending for SBCE with suspected small bowel Crohn's disease. Patient demographics, symptoms, medications and blood parameters were collected. Capsule endoscopy findings were analysed against calprotectin values, final diagnosis and blood parameters. RESULTS: A total of 146 patients were included (99 females and 47 males) with a mean age of 38±14 years. FC of more than 50 mg/kg was not significantly associated with clinically relevant capsule endoscopy findings (P=0.25), correlation coefficient was 0.11. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for FC at a cut-off of more than 50 mg/kg were 88.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 65.3-98.6], 25.0% (95% CI: 17.8-33.4), 14.3 (95% CI: 8.4-22.2) and 94.1% (95% CI: 80.3-99.3), respectively. A raised FC was not significantly associated with an elevated C-reactive protein or the presence of anaemia (P=0.19 and 0.10, respectively). CONCLUSION: FC performs modestly as a screening test to exclude small bowel inflammation. However, we recommend interpretation within the overall clinical context to avoid overlooking the infrequent patient with small bowel inflammation and a negative FC.

Clinical utility of double-balloon enteroscopy in suspected Crohn's disease: a single-centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Small bowel Crohn's disease has a heterogeneous presentation leading to a delay in diagnosis. Capsule endoscopy is now a well-established diagnostic tool; however, few studies have evaluated the role of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) in patients with suspected Crohn's disease. Histology obtained at DBE is useful in addition to clinical symptoms, blood parameters and capsule endoscopy findings to aid diagnosis and further management. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of DBE and histology on the management of patients with suspected small bowel Crohn's disease. METHODS: DBE procedures including histology for suspected Crohn's disease from 2006 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Follow-up data for all patients were collected. RESULTS: In our series of 399 double-balloon enteroscopies, 122 procedures were performed in 100 patients for suspected Crohn's disease. Positive DBE findings were found in 60% of patients. Forty-five per cent of patients were treated as Crohn's disease on the basis of a combination of histology, endoscopic appearance, clinical symptoms and blood parameters. Histology was diagnostic of Crohn's disease in 8% and supportive of it in 15%. In 12%, an alternative diagnosis was made, of whom two patients were diagnosed with small bowel malignancy on histology.After a median follow-up period of 27 months, the actual prevalence for a new diagnosis of Crohn's disease in our study was 38%. CONCLUSION: DBE has a useful place in clarifying the diagnosis in patients with suspected Crohn's disease. Although histology can be nondiagnostic, the combination of the macroscopic appearance with clinical correlation is useful in the diagnosis and management.

Does magnetically assisted capsule endoscopy improve small bowel capsule endoscopy completion rate? A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Delayed gastric emptying is a significant factor in incomplete small bowel capsule examinations. Gastric transit could be hastened by external magnetic control of the capsule. We studied the feasibility of this approach to improve capsule endoscopy completion rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial involving 122 patients attending for small bowel capsule endoscopy using MiroCam Navi. Patients were randomized to either the control group (mobilisation for 30 minutes after capsule ingestion, followed by intramuscular metoclopramide 10 mg if the capsule failed to enter the small bowel) or the intervention group (1000 mL of water prior to capsule ingestion, followed by positional change and magnetic steering). Outcome measures were capsule endoscopy completion rate, gastric clarity and distention, relationship of body habitus to capsule endoscopy completion rate (CECR), and patient comfort scores. RESULTS: 122 patients were recruited (61 each to the control and intervention groups: mean age 49 years [range 21 - 85], 61 females). There was no significant difference in CECR between the two groups (P = 0.39). Time to first pyloric image was significantly shorter in the intervention group (P = 0.03) but there was no difference in gastric transit times (P = 0.12), suggesting that magnetic control hastens capsular transit to the gastric antrum but does not influence duodenal passage. Gastric clarity and distention were significantly better in the intervention group (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic steering of a small bowel capsule is unable to overcome pyloric contractions to enhance gastric emptying and improve capsule endoscope completion rate. Excellent mucosal visualisation within the gastric cavity suggests this technique could be harnessed for capsule examination of the stomach.

The Utility of Capsule Endoscopy in Patients under 50 Years of Age with Recurrent Iron Deficiency Anaemia: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze?

Background and Aims. The role of capsule endoscopy (CE) in the <50 years of age patients with iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) remains unclear. We aim to assess its utility in this cohort. Methods. All patients referred for CE for recurrent IDA were included retrospectively. Patients were divided into Group 1 (<50 years) and Group 2 (≥50 years). Results. There were 971 patients with recurrent IDA and 28% belonged to Group 1. The mean age was 40 years in this group with a DY of 28% (n = 76). Significant diagnoses included erosions and ulcers (26%; n = 71), small bowel (SB) angioectasia (AE) (10%; n = 27), SB tumours (3%; n = 7), Crohn's disease (3%; n = 7), SB bowel strictures (1%; n = 3), and SB varices (1%; n = 2). On logistic regression, the presence of diabetes (P = 0.02) and the use of warfarin (P = 0.049) was associated with increased DY. The DY in Group 2 was 38% which was significantly higher than in Group 1 (P = 0.02). While SB tumours were equally common in both groups, AE was commoner in Group 2 (P < 0.001). Conclusion. A significant proportion of patients <50 years are referred for CE. Although the DY is lower compared to those ≥50 years, significant pathology is found in this age group. CE is advisable in patients <50 years old with recurrent IDA and negative bidirectional endoscopies.

Magnetically steerable gastric capsule endoscopy is equivalent to flexible endoscopy in the detection of markers in an excised porcine stomach model: results of a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Capsule endoscopy is well tolerated but control of its movement is needed in order to visualize the whole gastric surface. Technological developments have produced an external magnet to allow manipulation of the capsule within the gastric cavity. The aim of this study was to compare magnetically steerable gastric capsule endoscopy (MSGCE) with flexible endoscopy for the detection of beads in a porcine stomach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Beads were sewn onto the mucosal surface of 12 ex vivo porcine stomachs. Each model was examined by flexible endoscopy and MSGCE by two blinded investigators. MSGCE was performed according to a protocol using positional changes and magnetic steering. Outcome measures were number and location of beads identified, and duration of procedure. RESULTS: Flexible endoscopy identified 79 /90 beads (88 %), and MSGCE identified 80 /90 (89 %). The difference in sensitivities was 1.11 (95 % confidence interval 0.06 - 28.26). Thus, MSGCE was noninferior to flexible endoscopy. Mean examination times for flexible endoscopy and MSGCE were 3.34 minutes and 9.90 minutes, respectively. CONCLUSION: MSGCE was equivalent to conventional flexible endoscopy in the detection of beads in a porcine stomach model.

Small bowel patency assessment using the patency device and a novel targeted (limited radiation) computed tomography-based protocol.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Excretion of the patency capsule (PC) within a certain time frame may be used to demonstrate luminal patency prior to capsule endoscopy (CE). We aimed to determine how often further radiological imaging is needed to confirm luminal patency after PC, assess radiologists' ability to locate the PC on plain abdominal films, and evaluate the outcomes of a novel computed tomography (CT) protocol for PC localization. METHODS: A study of the ability of radiologists to localize PC using plain abdominal films was performed. A novel protocol targeting a limited CT at the level of the PC identified on the "scout" film if retained 30 h post-ingestion was prospectively evaluated in 400 consecutive patients undergoing PC. RESULTS: In a study of the confidence with which radiologists could localize the PC on plain films, radiologists preferred abdominal CT to localize PCs identified on plain films in 74% of cases. In a protocol based on the use of a PC and targeted, limited CT scan to confirm small bowel patency in those failing to excrete the PC 30 h post-ingestion, the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value were 99.4%, 90.0%, 99.7%, and 81.0%, respectively. Crohn's disease was the only statistically significant predictor associated with higher risk of luminal stricture (P=0.001) in post-hoc analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Excretion of the PC 30 h post-ingestion reliably predicts safe CE passage. Plain abdominal radiology is unreliable and a scout film targeted, limited CT scan offers an accurate minimal radiation method of determining small bowel patency.

Practical aspects of delivering a small bowel endoscopy service in the UK.

Capsule endoscopy remains at the forefront of small bowel investigation, offering the only non-invasive means of directly imaging the mucosa of the small bowel. Recommended for the investigation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, Crohn's disease, coeliac disease, small bowel tumours and hereditary polyposis syndromes, the uptake of small bowel capsule endoscopy has been widespread in the UK. However, despite a wealth of published literature supporting the utility of capsule endoscopy in clinical practice, there are limited data regarding the actual practical aspects of service delivery, training and quality assurance. In this article, we attempt to address this by considering specific factors that contribute to provision of a high-quality capsule service. The role of formal training, accreditation and quality assurance measures is also discussed.

The nurse endoscopist: moving ahead with time.

The field of nursing has rapidly evolved over the last few decades. In the United Kingdom, nurse endoscopists are widely accepted and play an important role in the structure of gastroenterology services. Capsule endoscopy is a relatively new technique to image the small bowel and requires a skill set based on observation, recognition, and interpretation of significant findings from computer images. The reading of the capsule video, however, is time consuming. This article discusses the evolving role of nurses within the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy with specific reference to small bowel endoscopy. We also discuss the potential challenges of the role of the nurse endoscopist and insights into what the future may hold.

Clinical utility of capsule endoscopy in patients with Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease unclassified.

BACKGROUND: Although small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) has developed an established role in Crohn's disease (CD), there is paucity of data on impact of SBCE on subsequent management. We investigated the clinical utility of SBCE in patients with suspected and established CD and inflammatory bowel disease unclassified (IBDU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients referred routinely from 2003 to 2009 with a diagnosis of IBDU, suspected or established CD were identified retrospectively. Data were collected for indications and findings at SBCE with subsequent follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 315 patients were identified. There were n=265 referred for suspected CD (of which n=37 had a prior diagnosis of IBDU) and n=50 with established CD. SBCE was suggestive of CD in 17% of the suspected CD group, 43% in the IBDU group and 66% in the established CD patients. In the suspected CD cohort, an eventual diagnosis of CD was made in 12% (n=31) after a mean follow-up of 15 months (range 1-84), resulting in a change of management in 90% (n=28/31). In patients with IBDU, the diagnosis of CD was made in 38% (n=14) after an average follow-up of 19 months (±2). In patients with established CD, management was altered in 73% of patients after SBCE. CONCLUSION: There was a low diagnostic yield in patients referred with suspected CD although a diagnosis at SBCE was predictive of a clinical diagnosis in the majority after a mean follow-up of 15 months. A diagnosis of CD was more likely in the IBDU and established CD cohort. SBCE diagnoses changed management in the majority of patients.

Capsule endoscopy in adult celiac disease: a potential role in equivocal cases of celiac disease?

BACKGROUND: There have been limited studies evaluating capsule endoscopy (CE) in equivocal celiac disease (CD). OBJECTIVE: To determine the role CE may have in equivocal CD cases, compared with patients with biopsy-proven and serology-proven CD who have persisting symptoms. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 62 patients with equivocal CD and 69 patients with nonresponsive CD. INTERVENTION: CE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Diagnostic yield of CE in equivocal cases and accuracy of mucosal abnormality detection in patients with nonresponsive CD. RESULTS: Equivocal cases (n = 62) were divided into two subgroups: group A (antibody-negative villous atrophy, n = 32) and group B (Marsh 1-2 changes, n = 30). In group A, CE secured a diagnosis of CD or Crohn's disease in 28% (9/32), significantly higher than the diagnostic yield in group B (7%; P = .044). In patients with CD with persisting symptoms, significant CE findings were identified in 12% (8/69), including 2 cases of enteropathy-associated lymphoma, 4 type 1 refractory disease cases, 1 polypoidal mass histologically confirmed to be a fibroepithelial polyp, and 1 case of ulcerative jejunitis. This outcome was significantly lower than the diagnostic yield of CE in antibody-negative villous atrophy (P = .048). LIMITATIONS: Single center. CONCLUSION: There have been no previous reports systematically evaluating equivocal CD by using CE. The diagnostic yield of CE in patients with antibody-negative villous atrophy is better than that of CE in patients with CD with persisting symptoms. We advocate the use of CE in equivocal cases, particularly in patients with antibody-negative villous atrophy.

Evaluating the role of small-bowel endoscopy in clinical practice: the largest single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVE: There are few centres that offer all forms of small-bowel endoscopic modalities [capsule endoscopy (CE), push enteroscopy (PE), double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) or single-balloon enteroscopy and intraoperative enteroscopy (IOE)]. Previous investigators have suggested that DBE may be more cost-effective as the first-line investigation. We evaluated the relationship among four modalities of small-bowel endoscopy in terms of demand, diagnostic yield, patient management and tolerability. METHODS: Data were collected on patients who underwent PE and IOE since January 2002, CE since June 2002 and DBE since July 2006. These included age, sex, indication of referral, comorbidity, previous investigations and diagnosis obtained, including subsequent management change. RESULTS: Demand for CE and DBE increased every year. A total of 1431 CEs, 247 PEs, 102 DBEs and 17 IOEs were performed over 93 months. The diagnostic yield was 88% for IOE compared with 34.6% for CE, 34.5% for PE and 43% for DBE (P<0.001). Management was altered by CE in 25%, by PE in 19% and by DBE in 33% of patients. However, 44% of patients who underwent DBE found the procedure difficult to tolerate. In 2009, for every 17 CEs performed, one patient underwent DBE locally. CONCLUSION: This is the first series to report the clinical experience of four modalities of small-bowel endoscopy from a single centre. The use of CE as first-line investigation, followed by PE/DBE or IOE, is potentially both less invasive and tolerable.

The role of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with dementia.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is an accepted technique for long-term enteral feeding. Its use has increased because of its relative technical simplicity and low complication rate. As a result, the demands for gastrostomy insertion have risen and now encompass indications where the long-term outcomes are uncertain. One example of this, are patients with end-stage dementia who may be unable or unwilling to eat. For this reason, dementia has become one of the most common indications for gastrostomy feeding. This article reviews the current evidence relating to PEG feeding in dementia as well as work from the authors' own group. The purpose of this review is to provide the reader with an overview of the published literature and suggest a practical approach for this difficult clinical situation. The changes which the authors have implemented and described (including audit data), may be something which any practising healthcare professional in this field may choose to incorporate into their own clinical practice.

Are lower gastrointestinal investigations necessary in patients with coeliac disease?

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy may be indicated in patients with coeliac disease who present with iron deficiency anaemia or in coeliac disease patients who have persisting diarrhoea despite being on a gluten-free diet. However, there are limited data to support this approach. METHODS: We prospectively recruited patients who were found to have coeliac disease, having been referred with newly diagnosed iron deficiency anaemia. We also recruited a second group of patients with known coeliac disease. These patients had persisting diarrhoea despite being on a gluten-free diet for 6 months. All patients had colonoscopy and were matched with controls (without coeliac disease) who had similar indications for colonoscopy. RESULTS: Ninety-eight consecutive new patients with coeliac disease and concurrent iron deficiency anaemia had colonoscopy performed. Twelve (12.2%) had pathology, three of which were carcinomas. This diagnostic yield was not significantly different from the findings in the control group 62/362 (17.1%) P=0.24. In coeliac disease patients with persisting diarrhoea (n=37), the diagnostic yield at colonoscopy was 1/37 (2.7%). This was significantly lower than our findings in the control group with chronic diarrhoea 55/390 (14%) P=0.05. CONCLUSION: Colonoscopy should be considered in patients with coeliac disease (over the age of 45 years) who present with iron deficiency anaemia. Whilst, for coeliac disease patients with persisting diarrhoea (on a gluten-free diet) in the absence of sinister symptoms, a flexible sigmoidoscopy may be the initial investigation in order to exclude microscopic colitis. However, further larger prospective studies are required to evaluate this approach.