Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33153155

ABSTRACT

The role of aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 viruses in airborne transmission of COVID-19 has been debated. The aerosols are transmitted through breathing and vocalization by infectious subjects. Some authors state that this represents the dominant route of spreading, while others dismiss the option. Here we present an adjustable algorithm to estimate the infection risk for different indoor environments, constrained by published data of human aerosol emissions, SARS-CoV-2 viral loads, infective dose and other parameters. We evaluate typical indoor settings such as an office, a classroom, choir practice, and a reception/party. Our results suggest that aerosols from highly infective subjects can effectively transmit COVID-19 in indoor environments. This "highly infective" category represents approximately 20% of the patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. We find that "super infective" subjects, representing the top 5-10% of subjects with a positive test, plus an unknown fraction of less-but still highly infective, high aerosol-emitting subjects-may cause COVID-19 clusters (>10 infections). In general, active room ventilation and the ubiquitous wearing of face masks (i.e., by all subjects) may reduce the individual infection risk by a factor of five to ten, similar to high-volume, high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtering. A particularly effective mitigation measure is the use of high-quality masks, which can drastically reduce the indoor infection risk through aerosols.


Subject(s)
Aerosols , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Models, Theoretical , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Air Microbiology , Algorithms , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Filtration , Humans , Masks , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Ventilation
2.
Anal Bioanal Chem ; 404(8): 2127-31, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22885975

ABSTRACT

Ambient aerosol particles affect both the earth's climate and human health. Both effects depend on the chemical composition of the particles including the binding state of specific elements. Modern on-line aerosol mass spectrometry is capable of measuring aerosol composition with high temporal resolution, avoiding artifacts often introduced by classical off-line methods. The two most common types of on-line aerosol mass spectrometers, laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometers (LDI-MS) and thermal desorption electron impact ionization mass spectrometers (TD-EI-MS) provide reliable information on the most common ambient inorganic and organic aerosol species with high temporal resolution. However, for less common aerosol species identification with both types of instrument is frequently associated with large uncertainties. Here, we provide an overview of the element speciation capabilities of current on-line aerosol mass spectrometry for both carbonaceous and non-carbon-containing aerosol species. We describe limitations and other issues for this type of on-line aerosol analysis.

3.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc ; 54(9): 1040-60, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15468658

ABSTRACT

Several collocated semicontinuous instruments measuring particulate matter with particle sizes < or =2.5 microm (PM2.5) sulfate (SO4(2-)) and nitrate (NO3-) were intercompared during two intensive field campaigns as part of the PM2.5 Technology Assessment and Characterization Study. The summer 2001 urban campaign in Queens, NY, and the summer 2002 rural campaign in upstate New York (Whiteface Mountain) hosted an operation of an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Ambient Particulate Sulfate and Nitrate Monitors, a Continuous Ambient Sulfate Monitor, and a Particle-Into-Liquid Sampler with Ion Chromatographs (PILS-IC). These instruments provided near real-time particulate SO4(2-) and NO3- mass concentration data, allowing the study of particulate SO4(2-)/NO3- diurnal patterns and detection of short-term events. Typical particulate SO4(2-) concentrations were comparable at both sites (ranging from 0 to 20 microg/m3), while ambient urban particulate NO3- concentrations ranged from 0 to 11 microg/m3 and rural NO3- concentration was typically less than 1 microg/m3. Results of the intercomparisons of the semicontinuous measurements are presented, as are results of the comparisons between the semicontinuous and time-integrated filter-based measurements. The comparisons at both sites, in most cases, indicated similar performance characteristics. In addition, charge balance calculations, based on major soluble ionic components of atmospheric aerosol from the PILS-IC and the filter measurements, indicated slightly acidic aerosol at both locations.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/analysis , Nitrates/analysis , Sulfates/analysis , Cities , Environmental Monitoring , New York , Particle Size
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...