ABSTRACT
Background: Periacetabular Osteotomy (PAO) is a well-established surgical intervention for the treatment of hip dysplasia. Purpose: Our primary objective was to assess whether a group of young flexibility athletes who underwent PAO for hip dysplasia recovered their pre-operative hip range of motion (ROM) within 1 year of surgery. Our secondary objective was to compare hip ROM recovery between a group of young flexibility athletes and a group of non-flexibility athletes who underwent PAO for hip dysplasia. Results: In our study, 100% of flexibility athletes regained preoperative hip external rotation at 1-year post-operation. This was also the first plane of motion to return to preoperative motion in flexibility athletes. A significantly higher percentage of non-flexibility athletes regained their preoperative hip internal rotation compared to flexibility athletes (100% compared to 54%; P = .02), but not flexion or external rotation at 1-year post-operation. Conclusion: Our findings may help providers to set expectations regarding the recovery of hip ROM in flexibility athletes who undergo PAO for hip dysplasia.Level of Evidence: Level IV.
Subject(s)
Dancing , Hip Dislocation, Congenital , Hip Dislocation , Humans , Acetabulum/surgery , Hip Dislocation/surgery , Hip Dislocation/complications , Retrospective Studies , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/complications , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/surgery , Osteotomy , Range of Motion, Articular , Athletes , Treatment Outcome , Hip Joint/surgeryABSTRACT
Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular bone can be problematic in the athlete. This case details the injury and outcome of an adolescent male athlete who experienced one year of intermittent foot pain without acute trauma. Radiographs and computed tomography demonstrated a triad of a navicular stress fracture, an os supranaviculare, and an osteochondral defect of the navicular bone. The patient underwent successful operative fixation and returned to painless full function with imaging demonstrating healing at six months. Diagnosis of a navicular stress fracture in the setting of both an os supranaviculare and osteochondral lesion of the navicular bone have not been reported elsewhere in the literature. While repetitive loading on the navicular bone can independently produce a stress fracture, the patient had an increased risk for this injury; the presumably pre-existing navicular osteochondral lesion and os supranaviculare may have resulted in decreased effective articular surface area, thereby increasing force on the navicular bone and producing a stress fracture. Understanding navicular stress fractures and concomitant bony pathology contributing to injury is crucial to successful diagnosis, management, and prevention of recurrence.
Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries , Foot Injuries , Fractures, Stress , Intra-Articular Fractures , Knee Injuries , Tarsal Bones , Humans , Male , Adolescent , Fractures, Stress/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Stress/surgery , Tarsal Bones/diagnostic imaging , Tarsal Bones/surgery , Tarsal Bones/injuries , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Radiography , Foot Injuries/pathology , Intra-Articular Fractures/pathology , Athletes , Ankle Injuries/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ankle fractures are one of the most common orthopedic injuries, and although most patients have a satisfactory outcome following operative fixation, there are patients that have persistent pain despite anatomic reduction. Intra-articular injuries have been suggested as one potential cause of these suboptimal outcomes. Our study assesses the clinical impact of performing an ankle arthroscopy during ankle fracture open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent operative fixation of a bimalleolar or trimalleolar ankle fracture at our institution from 2014 through 2018. We extracted all demographic data, fracture pattern, operative procedures performed, tourniquet times, arthroscopic findings and any arthroscopic interventions. We then conducted a phone and e-mail survey. Our study included 213 total patients (142 traditional ORIF, 71 ORIF plus arthroscopy) with an average age of 40 years. The average follow-up was 32.4 months with a survey follow-up rate of 50.7% (110/213). RESULTS: The average tourniquet time for the arthroscopy cohort was 10 minutes longer (89 minutes vs 79 minutes). During the arthroscopy, there was a 28% (20/71) rate of full-thickness osteochondral lesions, 33% (24/71) rate of loose bodies, and a 49% (35/71) rate of partial-thickness cartilage injury. The mean Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) physical function score among Weber B fibula fractures was 45.8 and 42.3 in the arthroscopy and nonarthroscopy groups, respectively (P = .012). In addition, the patient satisfaction rate in Weber B fibula fractures was higher in those patients who underwent arthroscopy compared with ORIF alone (93% vs 75%, P = .05). Patients who had a tibiotalar joint dislocation at the time of the ankle fracture had a significantly higher PROMIS physical function score (46.6 vs 40.2, P = .005) when their surgery included arthroscopy. CONCLUSION: Ankle arthroscopy at the time of ORIF led to statistically significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes for Weber B fibula fractures and ankle dislocations. There was no increase in complication rates and the arthroscopy took 10 minutes longer on average. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
