Older person's preferences for home vs hospital care in the treatment of acute illness.

BACKGROUND: Although the home is expanding as a potential site for acute illness treatment, little is known about patients' preferences for home vs the hospital. OBJECTIVE: To determine older persons' preferences for home or hospital as a treatment site for acute illness and factors associated with preference. METHODS: Two hundred forty-six community-dwelling persons aged 65 years or older hospitalized with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or pneumonia were identified in 2 urban teaching hospitals and received telephone interviews 2 months after hospitalization. They were asked their preference for home or hospital treatment, given the availability of equivalent therapies and outcomes at the 2 sites and a nursing visit and several hours of home health aide assistance daily in the home. They were also asked about changes in preference with changes in the description of the outcome or the availability of services. RESULTS: If home and hospital offered equivalent outcomes, 46% of the sample preferred treatment at home. Preferences were heavily dependent on the outcome of the illness, physician opinion about the best site of care, and the provision of house calls. Higher education, white race, living with a spouse, being deeply religious, and having 2 or more dependencies in activities of daily living were associated with a preference for home treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Under conditions of equivalent outcome, preferences for treatment site are almost equally divided between home and hospital. Explicit elucidation of preferences is necessary if patients' preferences are to play a meaningful role in decision making about site of care.

Older persons' perceptions of home and hospital as sites of treatment for acute illness.

PURPOSE: Home care is increasingly being used as a substitute for hospital care. This study examined older patients' perceptions of the home and of the hospital as treatment sites for acute illness and the patient characteristics that are associated with these perceptions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A series of questions derived from open-ended interviews supplemented by literature review were administered by telephone in a cross-sectional, descriptive study to community-dwelling persons age 65 years or older who had been hospitalized 2 months earlier with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or pneumonia. RESULTS: Among 246 participants, nearly equal proportions agreed with statements that the home and the hospital would be comfortable sites of care (54% versus 55%), that the home and the hospital would provide rapid recovery (41% versus 37%), and that home treatment and hospital treatment would be burdensome on family and friends (40% versus 33%). Although 93% would feel safe in the hospital, only 42% would feel safe at home. Perceptions were not associated with sociodemographic characteristics, primary diagnosis, self-rated health, depression, or social support. Functionally dependent patients had more positive perceptions of treatment at home. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of perceptions of home and hospital can facilitate assessing the acceptability of shifting acute care from hospital to home. Our findings suggest that successful expansion of acute home care will require flexibility in the use of home and hospital as well as education to change perceptions about the safety and efficacy of treatment at home.

Older persons' preferences for site of terminal care.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about patients' preferences for site of terminal care. OBJECTIVE: To describe older persons' preferences for home or hospital as the site of terminal care and to explore potential reasons for their preferences. DESIGN: Cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative interviews. SETTING: Participants' homes. PATIENTS: Community-dwelling persons 65 years of age or older who were recently hospitalized with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or pneumonia and were not selected according to life expectancy; 246 patients participated in quantitative interviews and 29 participated in qualitative interviews. MEASUREMENTS: Preference for site of terminal care and the reasons for that preference. RESULTS: In quantitative interviews, 118 patients (48%) preferred terminal care in the hospital, 106 (43%) preferred home, and 22 (9%) did not know. One third changed their preference when asked about their preference in the event of a nonterminal illness. Reasons for preference identified during qualitative interviews included the desire to be with family members and concerns about burden to family members and their ability to provide necessary care. Concern about long-term care needs resulted in preference for a nursing home when choice was not constrained to home and hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Preference for home as the site of care for terminal illness exceeds existing practice. However, the current debate about home versus hospital as the ideal site for end-of-life care may ignore an important issue to older persons--namely, the care of disabilities that precede death.

Who dies at home? Determinants of site of death for community-based long-term care patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine characteristics associated with site of death in a cohort of long-term homecare patients. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Community-based long-term care program. SUBJECTS: All patients 65 years of age or older who died within 1 year of admission during 1989 and 1990. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Site of death. RESULTS: Of 620 subjects, site of death was hospital for 302 (49%), home for 132 (21%), nursing home for 124 (20%), and inpatient hospice for 45 (7%). Among patients living at home before death, factors associated with dying at home rather than in a hospital or inpatient hospice included female gender (relative risk (RR) 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00, 1.90); severely dependent functional status (RR 2.38, CI 1.39, 4.17) and cognitive status (RR 1.51, CI 1.10, 2.06); and dying of cancer (RR 1.68, CI 1.11, 2.55), chronic lung disease (AOR 1.75, CI 1.04, 2.95), or coronary artery disease (RR 1.93, CI 1.21, 3.09). Living with a child (RR 1.45, CI .99, 2.11) showed a trend toward association with dying at home. CONCLUSIONS: Even among a subgroup of older persons receiving community-based long-term care, the frequency of home death is low. The finding of an association between functional, social, and disease status and site of death suggests that the relationship between these factors and patients' preferences and care needs must be examined in order to understand how to optimize the site of terminal care.

Older persons' preferences for site of treatment in acute illness.

OBJECTIVE: To explore how older persons form preferences for site of medical care by examining their perceptions of home care and hospital care. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews using the constant comparative method. SETTING: Respondents' homes. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-nine persons age 65 to 89 years who had been hospitalized with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or pneumonia and were receiving home care services. MAIN RESULTS: Respondents, who thought of home care only as a means to provide low-intensity and low-frequency services, were initially skeptical about expanded home care services to treat acute illness. Regardless of their opinions about home and hospital, all respondents preferred the site associated with the greatest chance of survival. If the sites offered equal survival, 52% of the respondents preferred treatment at home because of freedom from the constraints of the hospital and the comfort of familiar surroundings. For respondents who preferred the hospital, the home represented a frightening and lonely place to be sick. Respondents' views of the home and hospital were shaped by their social supports, self-reliance, religious beliefs, and past illness experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Because survival appears to be the most important determinant of preference, home treatment of acute illness is a viable alternative only if it provides outcomes equivalent to those of hospitalization. Strongly held perceptions that home care can only be a low-intensity service may limit preferences for home treatment. When expected outcomes at the two sites are similar, the challenge to the health care system will be incorporating patient preference about the process of care into decisions about the appropriate site of care.

Practical issues in physician-assisted suicide.

Support for the participation of physicians in the suicides of terminally ill patients is increasing, and the concrete effects on physician practice of a policy change with regard to physician-assisted suicide must be carefully considered. If physician-assisted suicide is legalized, physicians will need to gain expertise in understanding patients' motivations for requesting physician-assisted suicide, assessing mental status, diagnosing and treating depression, maximizing palliative interventions, and evaluating the external pressures on the patient. They will be asked to prognosticate not only about life expectancy but also about the onset of functional and cognitive decline. They will need access to reliable information about effective medications and dosages. The physician's position on physician-assisted suicide must be open to discussion between practitioner and patient. Protection of the patient's right to confidentiality must be balanced against the need of health care professionals and institutions to know about the patient's choice. Insurance coverage and managed care options may be affected. All of these issues need to be further explored through research, education, decision making by individual practitioners, and ongoing societal debate.

Physician responsibility in driver assessment.

This study describes the present physician practice of counseling patients about driving and reporting potentially unsafe drivers. A survey was sent to all licensed general practitioners, internists, ophthalmologists, neurologists, and neurosurgeons in Connecticut. Fifty-nine percent (2,049/3,450) of eligible physicians responded to the questionnaire. Seventy-seven percent of responding physicians stated that they discussed driving with their patients and 14% reported patients to the Department of Motor Vehicles. Specialists were more likely to discuss driving. Seventy-four percent of physicians thought that after a certain age individuals should be screened for their ability to drive. Overall, 59% of physicians thought it was their responsibility to report unsafe drivers to the Department of Motor Vehicles and the primary reasons for reporting were that driver safety was a public health issue and that potentially unsafe drivers posed a risk to themselves or to others. It was concluded that physicians recognize that driving safety is an important public health issue that needs better-defined legal and medical guidelines.

Psychomotor mobility and the elderly driver.

In summary, declines in motor ability and reaction time are noted with aging, although the effect of these changes on actual driving performance needs further elucidation. It may be possible to compensate partially for some of these declines through physical and behavioral training. Attention to the physical, cognitive, and sensory capacities of older individuals in the design of vehicles and roadways also may be beneficial. Considerable work still needs to be done to adequately assess the changes that occur with aging in driving ability, what factors influence these changes and their potential modification, as well as the costs of any interventions planned.

A simple procedure for general screening for functional disability in elderly patients.

We propose a short, simple approach that can be used by general internists to routinely screen the functional status of elderly patients in office practice. The approach relies on checking a limited number of targets that are commonly dysfunctional but often unappreciated when conventional histories and physical examinations are done for elderly patients. The new focus is on carefully selected tests of vision, hearing, arm and leg function, urinary incontinence, mental status, instrumental and basic activities of daily living, environmental hazards, and social support systems. Brief questions and easily observed tasks are used to obtain the information needed for a suitable, effective screening while minimizing the time for administration. The approach can be incorporated into routine practice if certain relatively unproductive procedures are eliminated from the routine clinical examination, and particularly if internists are suitably compensated for the additional time.