Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep ; 10(4): 421-426, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36276577

ABSTRACT

Purpose of Review: The aim was to synthesize key findings regarding the use of functional MRI (fMRI) to assess olfactory dysfunction (OD), and thus, to evaluate whether fMRI could be a reliable clinical diagnostic tool. Recent Findings: In response to olfactory stimulation, patients with quantitative OD display reduced activation in olfactory-related brain regions but also stronger activation in non-olfactory brain areas. Parosmic patients also seem to show both weaker and higher brain signals. As to trigeminal chemosensory system, fMRI suggests that central processing may be declined in patients with OD. Functional connectivity studies report a possible correlation between altered neuronal connections within brain networks and olfactory performances. Summary: fMRI emerges as a valuable and promising objective method in OD evaluation. Yet, its high inter-individual variability still precludes its routine clinical use for diagnostic purpose. Future research should focus on optimizing stimulation paradigms and analysis methods.

2.
Clin Oral Investig ; 18(8): 1949-61, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24420503

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the normal cortical projections of periodontal mechanoreceptors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A device using von Frey filaments delivered 1-Hz punctate tactile stimuli to the teeth during fMRI. In a block design paradigm, tooth (T) 11 and T13 were stimulated in ten volunteers and T21 and T23 in ten other subjects. Random-effect group analyses were performed for each tooth, and differences between teeth were examined using ANOVA. RESULTS: The parietal operculum (S2) was activated bilaterally for all teeth; the postcentral gyrus (S1) was activated bilaterally for T21 and T23 and contralaterally for T11 and T13. In the second-level analysis including the four teeth, we found five clusters: bilateral S1 and S2, and left inferior frontal gyrus, with no difference between teeth in somatosensory areas. However, the ANOVA performed on the S1 clusters found separately in each tooth showed that S1 activation was more contralateral for the canines. CONCLUSION: One-hertz mechanical stimulation activates periodontal mechanoreceptors and elicits bilateral cortical activity in S1 and S2, with a double representation in S2, namely in OP1 and OP4. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The cortical somatotopy of periodontal mechanoreceptors is poorly described. These findings may serve as normal reference to further explore the cortical plasticity induced by periodontal or neurological diseases.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Cortex/physiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Mechanoreceptors/physiology , Periodontium/physiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male
3.
Neuroscience ; 163(4): 1078-91, 2009 Nov 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19660529

ABSTRACT

Faces are recognized by means of both shape and surface reflectance information. However, it is unclear how these two types of diagnostic information are represented in the human brain. To clarify this issue, we tested 14 participants in an event-related functional magnetic resonance adaptation paradigm, with four conditions created by using a 3D morphable model: (1) repetition of the same adapting face; (2) variation in shape only; (3) variation in surface reflectance only; (4) variation in both shape and surface reflectance. Change in face shape alone was the dominant driving force of the adaptation release in functionally defined face-sensitive areas in the right hemisphere (fusiform face area [FFA], occipital face area [OFA]). In contrast, homologous areas of the left hemisphere showed comparable adaptation release to changes in face shape and surface reflectance. When both changes in shape and reflectance were combined, there was no further increased release from adaptation in face-sensitive areas. Overall, these observations indicate that the two main sources of information in individual faces, shape and reflectance, contribute to individual face sensitivity found in the cortical face network. Moreover, the sensitivity to shape cues is more dominant in the right hemisphere, possibly reflecting a privileged mode of global (holistic) face processing.


Subject(s)
Brain/physiology , Face , Visual Perception/physiology , Analysis of Variance , Brain Mapping , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Models, Biological , Neuropsychological Tests , Photic Stimulation , Psychophysics , Reaction Time , Young Adult
4.
J Cogn Neurosci ; 12(5): 793-802, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11054921

ABSTRACT

Behavioral studies indicate a right hemisphere advantage for processing a face as a whole and a left hemisphere superiority for processing based on face features. The present PET study identifies the anatomical localization of these effects in well-defined regions of the middle fusiform gyri of both hemispheres. The right middle fusiform gyrus, previously described as a face-specific region, was found to be more activated when matching whole faces than face parts whereas this pattern of activity was reversed in the left homologous region. These lateralized differences appeared to be specific to faces since control objects processed either as wholes or parts did not induce any change of activity within these regions. This double dissociation between two modes of face processing brings new evidence regarding the lateralized localization of face individualization mechanisms in the human brain.


Subject(s)
Dominance, Cerebral/physiology , Face , Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology , Temporal Lobe/physiology , Adult , Brain Mapping , Humans , Male , Temporal Lobe/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, Emission-Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL