Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Sex Transm Dis ; 44(5): 274-277, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28407642

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention does not recommend routine oropharyngeal and anorectal screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the general population, they do recommend it for men who have sex with men. However, risk-based extragenital screening of men may not have been adopted at all college health centers, and existing research has not focused on the college population. METHODS: We examined health records of men at a college health center in a large urban university over 6 years to evaluate effectiveness of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae screening. We also evaluated the proportion of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infections that would have been missed if risk-based extragenital screening were not performed. Decisions to screen at extragenital sites were based on patient-reported risk behavior. RESULTS: For 4093 male college students screened, 7.6% of the screening visits used extragenital screening in response to self-reported risk behaviors. The case positivity rate for C. trachomatis was 3.1% with urogenital-only screening and 3.7% with risk-prompted extragenital screening. The case positivity rate for N. gonorrhoeae was 0.7% with urogenital-only screening and 3.3% with risk-prompted extragenital screening. If the college health center had relied solely on urogenital screening rather than risk-based extragenital screening, 26.4% of C. trachomatis infections and 63.2% of N. gonorrhoeae infections would have been missed. CONCLUSIONS: One out of four C. trachomatis infections and 2 of 3 N. gonorrhoeae infections would have been missed without extragenital screening in this analysis of college men. This study reinforces Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations for risk-based extragenital screening and is the first report to focus on college men. Because guidelines exist only for men, future studies should focus on extragenital screening in college women to build evidence for another group of patients that may benefit from this practice, given the high risk in young adults.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolation & purification , Gonorrhea/diagnosis , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/isolation & purification , Adult , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Chlamydia Infections/microbiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Gonorrhea/epidemiology , Gonorrhea/microbiology , Humans , Male , Medical Records , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
BMC Pediatr ; 17(1): 52, 2017 02 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28193249

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: 1) To identify socio-demographic factors associated with parental "no-intent" for their 13-17 year old unvaccinated daughter to receive the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine series within the next twelve months, 2) to describe patterns in "no-intent" by socio-demographic factors, and 3) to identify socio-demographic factors associated with parental reasons for "no-intent". METHODS: Data from 2008-2012 National Immunization Survey - Teen (NIS - Teen) were examined in this study. Parents with "no-intent" to vaccinate their daughters were asked to identify reasons for their decision. All responses were categorized into five domains identified as barriers to receive the HPV vaccine series: 1) Safety and Effectiveness Concerns; 2) Systemic Barriers; 3) Vaccine Misinformation; 4) Lack of Knowledge about the Vaccine; and 5) Socio-cultural Barriers. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed to address the study objectives. RESULTS: Number of people in the household, household income, mother's age, education, health insurance, recommendation of a health care provider, and the survey year were significantly associated with parental "no-intent". Race/ethnicity, mother's education, marital status, recommendation of a health care provider, household income, age of the unvaccinated daughter, and the survey year, were significantly associated with one or more domains identified as barriers to receive the HPV vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified sub-groups of parents across different socio-demographic factors with "no-intent" for their adolescent daughters to receive the HPV vaccine. Developing strategies that target educational tools towards the identified sub-groups of parents about the purpose, safety, and efficacy of the HPV vaccine, and HPV infection, may help increase HPV vaccine acceptance, initiation and completion rates.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Immunization/trends , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/pharmacology , Parents , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination/trends , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 64(28): 773, 2015 Jul 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26203633

ABSTRACT

On February 20, 2015, a northeastern university's student health center was notified of five veterinary medicine students with gastrointestinal symptoms. An investigation was conducted to establish the existence of an outbreak, determine the etiology, evaluate risk factors, and recommend control measures.


Subject(s)
Cryptosporidiosis/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Education, Veterinary , Students, Medical , Zoonoses , Adult , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/transmission , Cryptosporidiosis/transmission , Cryptosporidium/isolation & purification , Feces/parasitology , Female , Humans , Male , Philadelphia/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...