Quality improvements of healthcare trajectories by learning from aggregated patient-reported outcomes: a mixed-methods systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: In healthcare, analysing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on an aggregated level can improve and regulate healthcare for specific patient populations (meso level). This mixed-methods systematic review aimed to summarize and describe the effectiveness of quality improvement methods based on aggregated PROMs. Additionally, it aimed to describe barriers, facilitators and lessons learned when using these quality improvement methods. METHODS: A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted. Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies that described, implemented or evaluated a quality improvement method based on aggregated PROMs in the curative hospital setting. Quality assessment was conducted via the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Quantitative data were synthesized into a narrative summary of the characteristics and findings. For the qualitative analysis, a thematic synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: From 2360 unique search records, 13 quantitative and three qualitative studies were included. Four quality improvement methods were identified: benchmarking, plan-do-study-act cycle, dashboards and internal statistical analysis. Five studies reported on the effectiveness of the use of aggregated PROMs, of which four identified no effect and one a positive effect. The qualitative analysis identified the following themes for facilitators and barriers: (1) conceptual (i.e. stakeholders, subjectivity of PROMs, aligning PROMs with clinical data, PROMs versus patient-reported experience measures [PREMs]); (2a) methodological-data collection (i.e. choice, timing, response rate and focus); (2b) methodological-data processing (i.e. representativeness, responsibility, case-mix control, interpretation); (3) practical (i.e. resources). CONCLUSION: The results showed little to no effect of quality improvement methods based on aggregated PROMs, but more empirical research is needed to investigate different quality improvement methods. A shared stakeholder vision, selection of PROMs, timing of measurement and feedback, information on interpretation of data, reduction of missing data, and resources for data collection and feedback infrastructure are important to consider when implementing and evaluating quality improvement methods in future research.

Evaluation of bone resection margins of segmental mandibulectomy for oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Resection margins are frequently studied in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and are accepted as a constant prognostic factor. While most evidence is based on soft tissue margins, reported data for bone resection margins are scarce. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate and determine the utility of surgical margins in bone resections for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). The status of bone resection margins and their impact on survival was investigated in patients who had undergone segmental mandibulectomy for OCSCC. Medical records were retrieved for the years 2000-2012; 127 patients were identified and included in the study. Tumour-positive bone resection margins were found in 21% of the patients. The 5-year overall survival was significantly lower in this group (P<0.005). Therefore, there is a need for intraoperative feedback on the status of bone resection margins to enable immediate additional resection where necessary. Although the lack of intraoperative methods for the evaluation of bone tissue has been addressed by many authors, there is still no reliable method for widespread use. Future research should focus on an objective, accurate, and rapid method of intraoperative assessment for the entire bone resection margin to optimize patient outcomes.

Influence of anemia and BMI on prognosis of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Development of an updated prognostic model.

OBJECTIVE: evaluating the impact of anemia and body mass index (BMI) on survival, and development of a prognostic model for overall survival for patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed including all consecutive patients with LSCC diagnosed and treated at the Erasmus Medical Center between January 2006 and December 2013. Patient- and tumor-specific data were collected using data from the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization and supplemented with data from patient records available in the Erasmus MC. All comorbidities were scored at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS: in total 788 patients were included. Mean follow-up time was 50 months (SD: ±30), during which 298 patients (37.8%) died. In both univariate and multivariate analysis BMI and anemia were significant predictors for overall survival. Multivariate analysis was performed using known predictors such as age, TNM-stage and comorbidity (ACE-27). The hazard ratio of anemia was 1.41 (95% CI: 1.05-1.90) and of BMI was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94-0.99). BMI had an inverse association with overall survival in both univariate and multivariate survival analysis. Updating and validating an existing prognostic model with addition of anemia and BMI enhanced the performance of the prognostic model (C-statistic) from 0.77 (95% CI: 0.74-0.79) to 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77-0.82). CONCLUSION: anemia and BMI are predictors of overall survival for LSCC, independent of other known predictors of overall survival. Adding anemia and BMI to an existing prognostic model provides better prediction of overall survival.

Adjuvant radiotherapy in sinonasal mucosal melanoma: A retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of outcome after curative treatment for sinonasal mucosal melanoma focused on the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on recurrence and survival. DESIGN: Retrospective chart analysis. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-one patients with primary sinonasal mucosal melanoma who underwent surgical resection with curative intention between 1980 and 2016 at Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were categorised into 2 groups: surgery alone and surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy. Log-rank test was used to compare rates of recurrence and survival between treatment groups. Predictors for treatment modality, recurrence and survival were assessed with multivariate statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of all patients, 23.5% developed local recurrence and 47.1% developed distant metastasis. Estimated 5-year disease-free survival was 25.2%, and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 38.1%. Forty-three patients (84.3%) were treated with post-operative radiotherapy. Patients who underwent surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy presented more often with high tumour stage, tumour involving multiple sites and positive margins. Post-operative radiotherapy seemed to be associated with better local control (P = .549). No effect was found on occurrence of distant metastasis and OS. Positive margin status was an independent negative predictor for distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our treatment outcomes are consistent with literature. Post-operative radiotherapy seems to be associated with improved local control despite advanced disease and positive margin status in this treatment group.