Computed tomography versus invasive coronary angiography: design and methods of the pragmatic randomised multicentre DISCHARGE trial.

OBJECTIVES: More than 3.5 million invasive coronary angiographies (ICA) are performed in Europe annually. Approximately 2 million of these invasive procedures might be reduced by noninvasive tests because no coronary intervention is performed. Computed tomography (CT) is the most accurate noninvasive test for detection and exclusion of coronary artery disease (CAD). To investigate the comparative effectiveness of CT and ICA, we designed the European pragmatic multicentre DISCHARGE trial funded by the 7th Framework Programme of the European Union (EC-GA 603266). METHODS: In this trial, patients with a low-to-intermediate pretest probability (10-60 %) of suspected CAD and a clinical indication for ICA because of stable chest pain will be randomised in a 1-to-1 ratio to CT or ICA. CT and ICA findings guide subsequent management decisions by the local heart teams according to current evidence and European guidelines. RESULTS: Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke as a composite endpoint will be the primary outcome measure. Secondary and other outcomes include cost-effectiveness, radiation exposure, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), socioeconomic status, lifestyle, adverse events related to CT/ICA, and gender differences. CONCLUSIONS: The DISCHARGE trial will assess the comparative effectiveness of CT and ICA. KEY POINTS: • Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. • Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the reference standard for detection of CAD. • Noninvasive computed tomography angiography excludes CAD with high sensitivity. • CT may effectively reduce the approximately 2 million negative ICAs in Europe. • DISCHARGE addresses this hypothesis in patients with low-to-intermediate pretest probability for CAD.

Multicentre multi-device hybrid imaging study of coronary artery disease: results from the EValuation of INtegrated Cardiac Imaging for the Detection and Characterization of Ischaemic Heart Disease (EVINCI) hybrid imaging population.

AIMS: Hybrid imaging provides a non-invasive assessment of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion. We sought to evaluate the added clinical value of hybrid imaging in a multi-centre multi-vendor setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fourteen centres enrolled 252 patients with stable angina and intermediate (20-90%) pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), CT coronary angiography (CTCA), and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR). Hybrid MPS/CTCA images were obtained by 3D image fusion. Blinded core-lab analyses were performed for CTCA, MPS, QCA and hybrid datasets. Hemodynamically significant CAD was ruled-in non-invasively in the presence of a matched finding (myocardial perfusion defect co-localized with stenosed coronary artery) and ruled-out with normal findings (both CTCA and MPS normal). Overall prevalence of significant CAD on QCA (>70% stenosis or 30-70% with FFR≤0.80) was 37%. Of 1004 pathological myocardial segments on MPS, 246 (25%) were reclassified from their standard coronary distribution to another territory by hybrid imaging. In this respect, in 45/252 (18%) patients, hybrid imaging reassigned an entire perfusion defect to another coronary territory, changing the final diagnosis in 42% of the cases. Hybrid imaging allowed non-invasive CAD rule-out in 41%, and rule-in in 24% of patients, with a negative and positive predictive value of 88% and 87%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients at intermediate risk of CAD, hybrid imaging allows non-invasive co-localization of myocardial perfusion defects and subtending coronary arteries, impacting clinical decision-making in almost one every five subjects.

Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.

BACKGROUND: The choice of imaging techniques in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) varies between countries, regions, and hospitals. This prospective, multicenter, comparative effectiveness study was designed to assess the relative accuracy of commonly used imaging techniques for identifying patients with significant CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 475 patients with stable chest pain and intermediate likelihood of CAD underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging by single photon emission computed tomography or positron emission tomography, and ventricular wall motion imaging by stress echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance. If ≥1 test was abnormal, patients underwent invasive coronary angiography. Significant CAD was defined by invasive coronary angiography as >50% stenosis of the left main stem, >70% stenosis in a major coronary vessel, or 30% to 70% stenosis with fractional flow reserve ≤0.8. Significant CAD was present in 29% of patients. In a patient-based analysis, coronary computed tomographic angiography had the highest diagnostic accuracy, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve being 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.94), sensitivity being 91%, and specificity being 92%. Myocardial perfusion imaging had good diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve, 0.74; confidence interval, 0.69-0.78), sensitivity 74%, and specificity 73%. Wall motion imaging had similar accuracy (area under the curve, 0.70; confidence interval, 0.65-0.75) but lower sensitivity (49%, P<0.001) and higher specificity (92%, P<0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging and wall motion imaging were lower than that of coronary computed tomographic angiography (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a multicenter European population of patients with stable chest pain and low prevalence of CAD, coronary computed tomographic angiography is more accurate than noninvasive functional testing for detecting significant CAD defined invasively. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00979199.

Plaque distribution in clopidogrel responders and low responders as determined by multislice computed tomography.

Via multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with retrospective electrographic gating, we sought to evaluate whether plaque distribution differs between responders and low responders to clopidogrel treatment. Low response was defined as a post-treatment aggregation of 35% to 70%. In this observational study, we enrolled 62 patients (mean age, 64.8 ± 8.9 yr; 51 men). In addition to determining coronary calcium scores, we performed noninvasive coronary angiography with MDCT before stent implantation. Plaques were visually classified as calcified, mixed, or completely noncalcified. Mean density was measured. Residual platelet aggregation (RPA) was evaluated by aggregometry 6 hr after administration of a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel. Patients with an RPA of less than 35% were defined as responders.The median calcium score was 736 Agatston score equivalent (ASE) (range, 0-5,772) and mean platelet inhibition was 35% ± 19% (range, 0-70%). A total of 494 coronary plaques were detected (responders: calcified, 197; mixed, 47, noncalcified, 5; and low responders: calcified, 177; mixed, 65; noncalcified, 3). Responders (n = 35) had significantly lower ASEs and fewer mixed but more calcified plaques than did low responders. In mean plaque density (measured within the noncalcified part of the plaques), no statistically significant difference existed between the 2 patient groups. By use of MDCT, we showed that ASE and plaque distribution were associated with RPA after clopidogrel treatment. Patients with a low coronary plaque burden and a small proportion of mixed plaques were more likely to have low RPA after administration of clopidogrel.

Prevalence and clinical characteristics of symptomatic patients with obstructive coronary artery disease in the absence of coronary calcifications.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The quantification of coronary calcification has established itself as a valid risk marker to predict cardiovascular events. However, data derived from cardiac multi-detector row computed tomography could demonstrate that the exclusion of coronary calcification is not synonymous with the exclusion of coronary artery disease (CAD). The aims of this retrospective analysis were to determine the prevalence of significant CAD in a symptomatic cohort with indications for invasive angiography but without coronary calcification (Agatston score 0) as assessed by multislice computed tomography and to investigate whether there were any differences in terms of risk factors between patients with and without significant CAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred multislice computed tomographic scans (in 371 men and 129 women) were included in the analysis. Agatston scores were determined on native scans. All patients underwent coronary angiography to detect or rule out obstructive CAD. Patients with negative calcium scoring were selected and divided into two subgroups: those without obstructive CAD and those with obstructive CAD (luminal stenoses > 50%). These subgroups were characterized in terms of clinical characteristics (age and sex) and cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipoproteinemia, familial predisposition, smoking, and overweight). RESULTS: Sixty-one of 500 patients (12.2%) had negative calcium scores (Agatston score 0). Sixteen of these patients (26.3%, or 3.2% of the total population) had obstructive CAD according to invasive angiography. Patients with obstructive CAD were significantly older (mean age, 64 ± 9 vs 55 ± 10 years; P = .003) and were more frequently diabetic (25% vs 4%, P = .0389) than patients without obstructive CAD. There were no significant differences with regard to the other risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: In this high-risk population, the absence of coronary calcification was not sufficient to rule out CAD. Among patients without coronary calcification, the presence of significant CAD was associated with increased age and the presence of diabetes mellitus.

Semi-automatic assessment of global left ventricular function and left ventricular parameters with dual-source computed tomography: comparison with invasive angiography.

This study assesses the global left ventricular function and volumes using dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) with improved temporal resolution (83 ms) by use of a semi-automatic software tool in comparison to invasive angiography (IVA). One hundred patients scheduled for invasive coronary angiography because of suspected or known coronary artery disease (80 men; 20 women, mean age 62 +/- 10 years) were additionally examined by DSCT. Global left ventricular function (LVF), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), end-systolic volume (LVESV), and stroke volume (SV) were calculated by the use of semi-automatic post-processing software and results compared with those of IVA. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a good concordance between DSCT and IVA in terms of LVF: Pearson's r 0.78, confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.86, P < 0.0001, bias 7.1% +/- 9.1%. The same was true for LVESV (Pearson's r 0.78, CI 0.67-0.85, P < 0.0001, bias 15.0 +/- 21.0 ml), whereas the agreement for LVEDV and SV was only moderate (LVEDV: Pearson's r 0.59, CI 0.43-0.72, P < 0.0001, bias 13.0 +/- 18.1 ml; SV: Pearson's r 0.47, CI 0.28-0.62, P < 0.0001, bias -1.4 +/- 28.4 ml). Semi-automatic evaluation of left ventricular parameters with DSCT revealed good correlation for LVF and LVESV, whereas LVEDV and SV showed only a moderate correlation. Moreover, LVF is systematically underestimated by DSCT.

Does clinical pretest probability influence image quality and diagnostic accuracy in dual-source coronary CT angiography?

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To prospectively evaluate the influence of the clinical pretest probability assessed by the Morise score onto image quality and diagnostic accuracy in coronary dual-source computed tomography angiography (DSCTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 61 patients, DSCTA and invasive coronary angiography were performed. Subjective image quality and accuracy for stenosis detection (>50%) of DSCTA with invasive coronary angiography as gold standard were evaluated. The influence of pretest probability onto image quality and accuracy was assessed by logistic regression and chi-square testing. Correlations of image quality and accuracy with the Morise score were determined using linear regression. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were categorized into the high, 21 into the intermediate, and 2 into the low probability group. Accuracies for the detection of significant stenoses were 0.94, 0.97, and 1.00, respectively. Logistic regressions and chi-square tests showed statistically significant correlations between Morise score and image quality (P < .0001 and P < .001) and accuracy (P = .0049 and P = .027). Linear regression revealed a cutoff Morise score for a good image quality of 16 and a cutoff for a barely diagnostic image quality beyond the upper Morise scale. CONCLUSION: Pretest probability is a weak predictor of image quality and diagnostic accuracy in coronary DSCTA. A sufficient image quality for diagnostic images can be reached with all pretest probabilities. Therefore, coronary DSCTA might be suitable also for patients with a high pretest probability.

Diagnostic accuracy and image quality of cardiac dual-source computed tomography in patients with arrhythmia.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) permits accurate visualization of high-grade coronary artery stenosis. However, in patients with heart rate irregularities, MDCT was found to have limitations. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a new dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) scanner generation with 83 ms temporal resolution in patients without stable sinus rhythm. METHODS: 44 patients (31 men, mean age 67.5+/-9.2 years) without stable sinus rhythm and scheduled for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) because of suspected (n=17) or known coronary artery disease (CAD, n=27) were included in this study. All patients were examined with DSCT (Somatom Definition, Siemens). Besides assessment of total calcium score, all coronary segments were analyzed with regard to the presence of significant coronary artery lesions (>50%). The findings were compared to ICA in a blinded fashion. RESULTS: During CT examination, heart rhythm was as follows: 25 patients (57%) atrial fibrillation, 7 patients (16%) ventricular extrasystoles (two of them with atrial fibrillation), 4 patients (9%) supraventricular extrasystoles, 10 patients (23%) sinus arrhythmia (heart rate variability>10 bpm). Mean heart rate was 69+/-14 bpm, median 65 bpm. Mean Agatston score equivalent (ASE) was 762, ranging from 0 to 4949.7 ASE. Prevalence of CAD was 68% (30/44). 155 segments (27%) showed "step-ladder" artifacts and 28 segments (5%) could not be visualized by DSCT. Only 70 segments (12%) were completely imaged without any artifacts. Based on a coronary segment model, sensitivity was 73%, specificity 91%, positive predictive value 63%, and negative predictive value 94% for the detection of significant lesions (>or=50% diameter stenosis). Overall accuracy was 88%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with heart rate irregularities, including patients with atrial fibrillation and a high prevalence of coronary artery disease, the diagnostic yield of dual-source computed tomography is still hampered due to a high number of segments with "step-ladder" artifacts.

Quantitative parameters to compare image quality of non-invasive coronary angiography with 16-slice, 64-slice and dual-source computed tomography.

Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) is a non-invasive modality to visualize coronary arteries with an overall good image quality. Improved spatial and temporal resolution of 64-slice and dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) scanners are supposed to have a positive impact on diagnostic accuracy and image quality. However, quantitative parameters to compare image quality of 16-slice, 64-slice MSCT and DSCT are missing. A total of 256 CT examinations were evaluated (Siemens, Sensation 16: n = 90; Siemens Sensation 64: n = 91; Siemens Definition: n = 75). Mean Hounsfield units (HU) were measured in the cavum of the left ventricle (LV), the ascending aorta (Ao), the left ventricular myocardium (My) and the proximal part of the left main (LM), the left anterior descending artery (LAD), the right coronary artery (RCA) and the circumflex artery (CX). Moreover, the ratio of intraluminal attenuation (HU) to myocardial attenuation was assessed for all coronary arteries. Clinical data [body mass index (BMI), gender, heart rate] were accessible for all patients. Mean attenuation (CA) of the coronary arteries was significantly higher for DSCT in comparison to 64- and 16-slice MSCT within the RCA [347 +/- 13 vs. 254 +/- 14 (64-MSCT) vs. 233 +/- 11 (16-MSCT) HU], LM (362 +/- 11/275 +/- 12/262 +/- 9), LAD (332 +/- 17/248 +/- 19/219 +/- 14) and LCX (310 +/- 12/210 +/- 13/221 +/- 10, all p < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between DSCT and 64-MSCT for the LV, the Ao and My. Heart rate had a significant impact on CA ratio in 16-slice and 64-slice CT only (p < 0.05). BMI had no impact on the CA ratio in DSCT only (p < 0.001). Improved spatial and temporal resolution of dual-source CT is associated with better opacification of the coronary arteries and a better contrast with the myocardium, which is independent of heart rate. In comparison to MSCT, opacification of the coronary arteries at DSCT is not affected by BMI. The main advantage of DSCT lies with the heart rate independency, which might have a positive impact on the diagnostic accuracy.

Cardiac dual-source computed tomography in patients with severe coronary calcifications and a high prevalence of coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac multidetector computed tomography (MSCT) permits the visualization of coronary artery stenosis. However, in patients with severe coronary calcifications, higher heart rates, and arrhythmia, MSCT was found to have limitations because of insufficient temporal and spatial resolution. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a new dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) scanner generation with 83-ms temporal resolution in cardiac imaging, especially in patients with high calcium scores and a high prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Of 82 unselected consecutive patients scheduled for invasive coronary angiography, 41 persons were identified to have severe coronary calcifications (Agatston score > 350; 35 men; 66.2 +/- 8.4 years). All coronary segments were analyzed after intravenous injection of contrast media for the presence of coronary artery lesions. RESULTS: Mean heart rate was 64 +/- 14 beats/min. Sixteen (39%) of 41 patients had nonsinus rhythm. Mean Agatston score equivalent (ASE) was 1391 (median 1146; range 358-3898). Prevalence of CAD was 98% (40 of 41). From a coronary segment model, sensitivity was 91%, specificity was 84%, positive predictive value was 70%, and negative predictive value was 96% for the detection of significant lesions (>50% diameter stenosis). Vessels with false-positive results had significantly higher ASE values than coronaries without false-positive results (median, 319.1 vs 143.3; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In unselected patients with severe coronary calcifications, a high prevalence of CAD and a large percentage with heart rhythm irregularities, our data indicate that the accuracy of DSCT is limited in clinical routine.

Coronary artery bypass grafts: assessment of graft patency and native coronary artery lesions using 16-slice MDCT.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of electrocardiography (ECG)-gated 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in detection of stenosis of bypass grafts and native coronary arteries in patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). ECG-gated contrast-enhanced MDCT using 12 x 0.75-mm collimation was performed in 20 patients with recurrent angina 4.75 years after undergoing CABG. A total of 50 grafts, 16 arterial and 34 venous, were examined. All graft and coronary segments were evaluated for stenosis in comparison with conventional coronary angiography (CCA). Among the 80 arterial graft segments, 62 could be assessed (77.5%). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for stenosis were 96.2%, 97.2%, 96.2%, and 97.2%, respectively. In a total of 180 venous graft segments, 167 could be assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for stenosis were 98.5%, 93.9%, 91.8%, and 98.9%, respectively. MDCT could assess 179 of 260 native coronary artery segments (68.8%). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for stenosis were 92.1%, 76.9%, 87.5%, and 84.7%, respectively. Sixteen-slice MDCT provides excellent image quality and diagnostic accuracy in detection of graft and coronary artery lesions in patients with suspected graft dysfunction.

Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-row multi-slice computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) scanners permit visualization of the coronary arteries and coronary artery bypass grafts. The latest MSCT generation with true 16-detector slices (Sensation 16 Speed 4 D, Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) provides improved temporal and spatial resolution, as well as significantly reduced scan time. To assess, whether this technical improvement has also an impact on image quality and accuracy of MSCT diagnosis in patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery the following study was conducted. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Thirteen consecutive patients (pts) (10 male, 3 female, mean age 62 +/- 6.4 [55-73] years, heart rate 68 +/- 11 [52-88] bpm) and a total number of 43 coronary bypass grafts (11 arterial, 32 venous grafts) were examined by MSCT (gantry rotation time 375 ms). In addition to the analysis of coronary bypass grafts, 13 coronary segments (sgts) were evaluated in each patient (n = 169 sgts). MSCT results were compared with coronary angiography. RESULTS: Forty-one of 43 bypass grafts (95%) were analyzable by MSCT. In conventional angiography 16 of 43 (37%) grafts were occluded. Sixteen of them were correctly diagnosed by MSCT (sensitivity 100%). One graft showed a 50% anastomosis stenosis which was also detected. Twenty-five of 27 grafts without severe lesion showed no significant stenosis in MSCT (specificity 93%, positive predictive value (PPV) 89%, negative predictive value (NPV) 100%). Ninety of 108 (83%) high-grade stenosis (>70%) of the native coronary vessels were correctly detected (sensitivity 83%, PPV 78%). From the 61 sgts without high grade stenosis 36 were correctly classified (specificity 59%, NPV 67%). If sgts number 8, 9 and 10, which are normally not target for revascularization, are excluded sensitivity rises to 89%, specificity to 71%, PPV to 87% and NPV to 75%. The correct clinical diagnosis (absence or presence of a high grade stenosis of at least one bypass graft) was achieved in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: True 16-slice MSCT with faster gantry rotation time allows detection of lesions in coronary artery bypass grafts with high sensitivity and specificity. The evaluation of native vessels in pts with known CAD remains a diagnostic challenge. However, the correct clinical diagnosis was achieved in all pts. MSCT is a non-invasive tool to assess coronary artery bypass grafts.

Coronary vessel visualization using true 16-row multi-slice computed tomography technology.

BACKGROUND: Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) scanners with retrospective ECG-gating permit visualization of the coronary arteries. Limited spatial and temporal resolution as well as breathing artefacts due to the scan time can cause poor distal vessel segment and side branch visualization. The latest MSCT generation with true 16-detector slices (Sensation 16), Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) provides furthermore improved temporal and spatial resolution, as well as significantly reduced scan time. To assess, whether this technical improvement has also an impact on image quality we conducted the following study. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Sixty-two consecutive patients (33 male, 29 female, mean age 63+/-8 [47-79] years, heart rate after beta-blockade 63+/-7 [45-86] bpm) with suspicion of coronary artery disease (CAD) were examined by cardiac MSCT. Parameter settings were: 0.75 mm collimation, 2.8mm table feed/rotation, caudocranial scan direction, 80 cc contrast media biphasic injection protocol, gantry rotation time 375 ms, temporal resolution 188 ms). Thirteen coronary segments (sgts) were evaluated in each patient (total number: 806 sgts). Image quality of each segment was determined as: excellent--free of motion artefacts, good--mild motion artefacts, relevant artefacts--still diagnostic value, severe calcification and insufficient image quality--not visualized segment. RESULTS: 301/806 (37%) sgts showed excellent and 294/806 (36%) sgts good image quality. Relevant artefacts were seen in 107/806 (13%) sgts, calcifications in 41/806 (5%) sgts. 63/806 (8%) sgts could not be visualized (34 of them (54%) either segment 9 or 10). Diagnostic image quality was achieved in 702/806 (87%) sgts. CONCLUSIONS: Due to true 16-slice technology and faster gantry rotation time MSCT image quality could be improved and allows a visualization of the entire coronary tree. Larger, randomized, catheter-controlled studies have to be conducted to determine, whether this improved visualization also translates into better diagnostic accuracy.

Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 16-multi-detector spiral computed tomography (MDCT) with 188 ms temporal resolution. BACKGROUND: Because of rapid technical innovations, MDCT coronary imaging has significantly improved in the last five years. Recent results indicate a high diagnostic accuracy, especially in patients with clinical suspicion of coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: A total of 72 consecutive patients (30 women, 42 men, age 64 +/- 10 years) scheduled for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) because of suspected CAD were additionally studied by MDCT (Sensation 16 Speed 4D, Siemens, Forchheim, Germany). Thirty-seven of 72 patients (51%) received an additional beta-blockade before MDCT because of heart rates >65 beats/min. The MDCT scans were analyzed regarding the presence of coronary artery lesions. Results were compared with ICA. RESULTS: All 72 scans showed diagnostic image quality (heart rate: 64.1 +/- 9.2 beats/min, calcium mass: 86 +/- 156 mg). Thirteen coronary segments were evaluated in each patient. Sixty-two of 936 (6.6%) segments showed a nondiagnostic image quality. All segments were included in the analysis. A total of 117 relevant lesions (diameter stenosis >50%) were detected using ICA, and 96 of 117 (82%) were detected by MDCT. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the whole study group were as follows: 82%, 98%, 87%, and 97%, respectively. The correct clinical diagnosis of presence or absence of significant CAD was obtained in 65 of 72 (90%) patients. All stenoses were detected by MDCT in 52 of 72 (72%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a high diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice MDCT with improved temporal resolution.