Disturbance of Vancomycin Infusion Flow during Multidrug Infusion: Influence on Endothelial Cell Toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Phlebitis is a common side effect of vancomycin peripheral intravenous (PIV) infusion. As only one PIV catheter is frequently used to deliver several drugs to hospitalized patients through the same Y-site, perturbation of the infusion flow by hydration or other IV medication may influence vancomycin exposure to endothelial cells and modulate toxicity. METHODS: We assessed the toxicity of variations in vancomycin concentration induced by drug mass flow variations in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), simulating a 24 h multi-infusion therapy on the same line. Results were expressed as the percentage of viable cells compared with a 100% control, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess the toxicity of vancomycin. RESULTS: Our results showed that variations in vancomycin concentration did not significantly influence local toxicity compared to a fixed concentration of vancomycin. Nevertheless, the loss of cell viability induced by mechanical trauma mimicking multidrug infusion could increase the risk of phlebitis. CONCLUSION: To ensure that vancomycin-induced phlebitis must have other causes than variation in drug mass flow, further in vitro experiments should be performed to limit mechanical stress to frequent culture medium change.

Endothelial Cell Toxicity of Vancomycin Infusion Combined with Other Antibiotics.

French guidelines recommend central intravenous (i.v.) infusion for high concentrations of vancomycin, but peripheral intravenous (p.i.v.) infusion is often preferred in intensive care units. Vancomycin infusion has been implicated in cases of phlebitis, with endothelial toxicity depending on the drug concentration and the duration of the infusion. Vancomycin is frequently infused in combination with other i.v. antibiotics through the same administrative Y site, but the local toxicity of such combinations has been poorly evaluated. Such an assessment could improve vancomycin infusion procedures in hospitals. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were challenged with clinical doses of vancomycin over 24 h with or without other i.v. antibiotics. Cell death was measured with the alamarBlue test. We observed an excess cellular death rate without any synergistic effect but dependent on the numbers of combined infusions when vancomycin and erythromycin or gentamicin were infused through the same Y site. Incompatibility between vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam was not observed in our study, and rinsing the cells between the two antibiotic infusions did not reduce endothelial toxicity. No endothelial toxicity of imipenem-cilastatin was observed when combined with vancomycin. p.i.v. vancomycin infusion in combination with other medications requires new recommendations to prevent phlebitis, including limiting coinfusion on the same line, reducing the infusion rate, and choosing an intermittent infusion method. Further studies need to be carried out to explore other drug combinations in long-term vancomycin p.i.v. therapy so as to gain insight into the mechanisms of drug incompatibility under multidrug infusion conditions.

Influence of vancomycin infusion methods on endothelial cell toxicity.

Peripheral intravenous therapy is frequently used in routine hospital practice and, due to various factors, its most common side effect is phlebitis. The infusion of vancomycin is particularly associated with phlebitis despite its widespread use. French guidelines recommend central intravenous infusion for high concentrations of vancomycin, but peripheral intravenous therapy is often preferred in intensive care units. Methods of vancomycin infusion are either intermittent infusion or continuous infusion. A comparison of these methods under in vitro conditions simulating clinical use could result in better infusion efficacy. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were therefore challenged with clinical doses of vancomycin over a 24- to 72-h period using these infusion methods. Cell death was measured with the alamarBlue test. Concentration-dependent and time-dependent vancomycin toxicity on HUVECs was noted with a 50% lethal dose at 5 mg/ml after 24 h, reaching 2.5 mg/ml after 72 h of infusion, simulating long-term infusion. This toxicity does not seem to be induced by acidic pH. In comparing infusion methods, we observed that continuous infusion induced greater cell toxicity than intermittent infusion at doses higher than 1 g/day. The increasing use of vancomycin means that new guidelines are required to avoid phlebitis. If peripheral intravenous therapy is used to reduce infusion time, along with intermittent infusion, vein irritation and localized phlebitis may be reduced. Further studies have to be carried out to explore the causes of vancomycin endothelial toxicity.

AIEC colonization and pathogenicity: influence of previous antibiotic treatment and preexisting inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) patients are abnormally colonized by adherent-invasive Escherichia coli (AIEC). NOD2 gene mutations impair intracellular bacterial clearance. We evaluated the impact of antibiotic treatment on AIEC colonization in wildtype (WT) and NOD2 knockout mice (NOD2KO) and the consequences on intestinal inflammation. METHODS: After 3 days of antibiotic treatment, mice were infected for 2 days with 109 CFU AIEC and sacrificed 1, 5, and 60 days later. In parallel, mice were challenged with AIEC subsequent to a dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) treatment and sacrificed 9 days later. Ileum, colon, and mesenteric tissues were sampled for AIEC quantification and evaluation of inflammation. RESULTS: Without antibiotic treatment, AIEC was not able to colonize WT and NOD2KO mice. Compared with nontreated animals, antibiotic treatment led to a significant increase in ileal and colonic colonization of AIEC in WT and/or NOD2KO mice. Persistent AIEC colonization was observed until day 5 only in NOD2KO mice, disappearing at day 60. Mesenteric translocation of AIEC was observed only in NOD2KO mice. No inflammation was observed in WT and NOD2KO mice treated with antibiotics and infected with AIEC. During DSS-induced colitis, colonization and persistence of AIEC was observed in the colon. Moreover, a dramatic increase in clinical, histological, and molecular parameters of colitis was observed in mice infected with AIEC but not with a commensal E. coli strain. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic treatment was necessary for AIEC colonization of the gut and mesenteric tissues and persistence of AIEC was dependent on NOD2. AIEC exacerbated a preexisting DSS-induced colitis in WT mice.

Visceral fat and gut inflammation.

The etiology of inflammatory bowel disease and, in particular, Crohn's disease involves a deregulated mucosal immune system under the influence of intestinal flora and environmental factors in genetically susceptible individuals. A new hypothesis has focused on mesenteric fat hypertrophy and the presence of ectopic fat surrounding inflamed bowel, the so-called creeping fat, which are hallmarks of Crohn's disease. Mesenteric adipose tissue is currently recognized as an active actor in immunity with a capacity for mediator secretion. These mediators include classic pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines or chemokines and hormone-like adipokines with multiple effects. Mesenteric fat participates in the course of Crohn's disease and may play an active role in the regulation of intestinal inflammation. However, little is known about the origin and role of mesenteric fat in Crohn's disease, essentially because of a lack of experimental models that develop creeping fat. The purpose of this review is to present the recent data describing the immune properties of mesenteric fat and the recent advances in animal models, which have suggested a new hypothesis about the role of creeping fat in Crohn's disease.