A learner-centered technique and clinical reasoning, reflection, and case presentation attributes in athletic training students.

CONTEXT: Providing opportunities to develop clinical decision-making skills, including clinical reasoning, is an important aspect of clinical education. The learner-centered technique of summarizing the history and findings, narrowing the differential, analyzing the differential, probing the instructor about uncertainties, plan management, and selecting an issue for self-directed study (SNAPPS) is used in medicine to express clinical reasoning. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of SNAPPS on the clinical reasoning, reflection, and 4 case presentation attributes (length, conciseness, case summary, and expression of clinical reasoning) in athletic training students. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Three undergraduate programs accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: We randomly assigned 38 athletic training students (17 men, 21 women; age = 21.53 ± 1.18 years, grade point average = 3.25 ± 0.31) who had completed at least 1 year of clinical education and all orthopaedic evaluation coursework to the SNAPPS group or the usual and customary group using a stratification scheme. INTERVENTION(S): The SNAPPS group completed four 45-minute clinical reasoning and case presentation learning modules led by an investigator to learn the SNAPPS technique, whereas the usual and customary group received no formal instruction. Both groups audio recorded all injury evaluations performed over a 2-week period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants completed the Diagnostic Thinking Inventory and Reflection in Learning Scale twice. Case presentations were analyzed for 4 attributes: length, conciseness, case summary, and expression of clinical reasoning. RESULTS: Case presentations were longer (t18.806 = -5.862, P < .001) but were more concise (t32 = 11.297, P < .001) for the SNAPPS group than for the usual and customary group. The SNAPPS group performed better on both the case summary subscale (t32 = 2.857, P = .007) and the clinical reasoning subscale (t25.773 = -14.162, P < .001) than the other group. We found a time effect for Diagnostic Thinking Inventory scores (F1,34 = 6.230, P = .02) but observed no group effects (F1,34 = 0.698, P = .41) or time-by-group interaction (F1,34 = 1.050, P = .31). The Reflection in Learning Scale scores analysis revealed no group-by-time interaction (F1,34 = 1.470, P = .23) and no group (F1,34 = 3.751, P = .06) or time (F1,34 = 0.835, P = .37) effects. CONCLUSIONS: The SNAPPS is an effective and feasible clinical education technique for case presentations. This learner-centered technique provides the opportunity for the expression of clinical reasoning skills.

Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in athletes with chronic ankle instability.

CONTEXT: The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) is a region-specific, non-disease-specific outcome instrument that possesses many of the clinimetric qualities recommended for an outcome instrument. Evidence of validity to support the use of the FAAM is available in individuals with a wide array of ankle and foot disorders. However, additional evidence to support the use of the FAAM for those with chronic ankle instability (CAI) is needed. OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence of construct validity for the FAAM based on hypothesis testing in athletes with CAI. DESIGN: Between-groups comparison. SETTING: Athletic training room. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Thirty National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II athletes (16 men, 14 women) from one university. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The FAAM including activities of daily living (ADL) and sports subscales and the global and categorical ratings of function. RESULTS: For both the ADL and sports subscales, FAAM scores were greater in healthy participants (100 +/- 0.0 and 99 +/- 3.5, respectively) than in subjects with CAI (88 +/- 7.7 and 76 +/- 12.7, respectively; P < .001). Similarly, for both ADL and sports subscales, FAAM scores were greater in athletes who indicated that their ankles were normal (98 +/- 6.3 and 96 +/- 6.9, respectively) than in those who classified their ankles as either nearly normal or abnormal (87 +/- 6.6 and 71 +/- 11.1, respectively; P < .001). We found relationships between FAAM scores and self-reported global ratings of function for both ADL and sports subscales. Relationships were stronger when all athletes, rather than just those with CAI, were included in the analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The FAAM may be used to detect self-reported functional deficits related to CAI.

The influence of a foot orthotic on lower extremity transverse plane kinematics in collegiate female athletes with pes planus.

Non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in female athletes remain prevalent. Athletes with excessive foot pronation have been identified to be at greater risk for non-contact ACL injury. Excessive foot pronation has been linked to increased medial tibial rotation. Increased medial tibial rotation heightens ACL strain and has been observed at or near the time of ACL injury. Foot orthotics have been shown to decrease medial tibial rotation during walking and running tasks. The effect of a foot orthotic on activities that simulate a non-contact ACL injury mechanism (i.e. landing) however is unknown. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine whether a foot orthotic was capable of altering transverse plane lower extremity kinematics in female athletes during landing. Twenty uninjured collegiate female athletes participating in the sports of basketball, soccer or volleyball with pes planus volunteered. Utilizing a repeated measures counterbalanced design, subjects completed two landing tasks with and without a foot orthotic using standardized footwear. The prefabricated orthotic had a rigid shell and a 6 extrinsic rear-foot varus post. Dependent measures included initial contact angle, peak angle, excursion and time to peak angle for both the tibia and femur. Statistical analysis suggested that the selected foot orthosis had little influence over lower extremity transverse plane kinematics. Several factors including: the limitation of a static measure to predict dynamic movement, inter-subject variability and the physical characteristics of the orthotic device likely account for the results. Future research should examine the influence of different types of foot orthotics not only on lower extremity kinematics but also tibiofemoral kinetics. Key PointsLower extremity transverse plane kinematics in female athletes during a landing task exhibit substantial variability.A rigid prefabricated foot orthotic does not significantly alter transverse plane lower extremity kinematics in female athletes with a navicular drop of at least 8mm.Additional study is necessary before firm conclusions regarding the influence of an orthotic device on lower extremity kinematics, kinetics, neuromuscular control and ultimately injury rates can be made.

Reliability and validity of the Biodex system 3 pro isokinetic dynamometer velocity, torque and position measurements.

This study quantitatively assessed the mechanical reliability and validity of position, torque and velocity measurements of the Biodex System 3 isokinetic dynamometer. Trial-to-trial and day-to-day reliability were assessed during three trials on two separate days. To assess instrument validity, measurement of each variable using the Biodex System 3 dynamometer was compared to a criterion measure of position, torque and velocity. Position was assessed at 5 degrees increments across the available range of motion of the dynamometer. Torque measures were assessed isometrically by hanging six different calibrated weights from the lever arm. Velocity was assessed (30 degrees/s to 500 degrees/s) across a 70 degrees arc of motion by manually accelerating the weighted lever arm. With the exception of a systematic decrease in velocity at speeds of 300 degrees/s and higher, the Biodex System 3 performed with acceptable mechanical reliability and validity on all variables tested.

Active knee joint velocity replication measures are stable and accurate in healthy individuals.

The purpose of this study was to determine the stability and accuracy of active knee joint velocity replication methods in healthy subjects. We used a repeated measures design with 14 healthy volunteers. Measures of velocity replication were performed in two ranges of knee joint flexion (0 degrees -30 degrees and 60 degrees -90 degrees ), across four testing velocities (5, 10, 15, and 30 degrees /s) in two movement directions (flexion and extension). Statistical analysis included intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; 2, k) and associated standard error of the measures calculated between day 1 and 2. We performed z-tests between all possible combinations of ICC pairs using Fisher's Z transformations to determine if any significant differences existed between observed ICCs. We also calculated correlation ratios (eta2) to explain the source of variability in the calculated ICCs. To assess measurement accuracy, we calculated constant error and absolute error between criterion and replication velocities. Results on ICCs and standard error of the measurements (SEMs) ranged from r = -0.44 +/- 7.00 to 0.88 +/- 0.72 degrees /s. Calculated z-tests indicated six paired ICCs were significantly different ( p < 0.1). In all six pairs, the faster test velocity had a lower ICC magnitude. The eta2 calculations demonstrated that inconsistent performance between day 1 and 2 caused the low ICC magnitudes observed with faster testing velocities. Significantly more absolute error occurred at 30 and 15 degrees /s compared with 5 degrees /s. Significantly less constant error was observed for 30 degrees /s compared with 15 degrees /s. A significant direction by range of motion interaction indicated less constant error for flexion movements in the 60 degrees -90 degrees range of motion (ROM) as compared with extension movements in either ROM. Healthy individuals could actively replicate slower criterion velocities in the mid and end ranges of knee joint motion in both movement directions with an acceptable amount of consistency and accuracy. The data support the use of velocity replication in future investigations on proprioceptive function.