Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Neurocase ; 25(5): 169-176, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31272279

ABSTRACT

This case series explores the relationship between verbal memory capacity and sentence comprehension in four patients with aphasia. Two sentence comprehension tasks showed that two patients, P1 and P2, had impaired syntactic comprehension, whereas P3 and P4's sentence comprehension was intact. The memory assessment tasks showed that P1 and P2 had severely impaired short-term memory, whereas P3 and P4 performed within the normal range in the short-term memory tasks. This finding suggests an association between short-term memory deficit and sentence comprehension difficulties. P1 and P3 exhibited impaired comparable working memory deficits, suggesting a dissociation between working memory and sentence comprehension.


Subject(s)
Aphasia/psychology , Comprehension , Memory Disorders/etiology , Memory, Short-Term , Adult , Aphasia/complications , Aphasia/diagnosis , Humans , Linguistics , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests
2.
Cogn Neuropsychol ; 30(7-8): 578-96, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24527801

ABSTRACT

The convergence hypothesis [Green, D. W. (2003). The neural basis of the lexicon and the grammar in L2 acquisition: The convergence hypothesis. In R. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken, & R. Towell (Eds.), The interface between syntax and the lexicon in second language acquisition (pp. 197-218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins] assumes that the neural substrates of language representations are shared between the languages of a bilingual speaker. One prediction of this hypothesis is that neurodegenerative disease should produce parallel deterioration to lexical and grammatical processing in bilingual aphasia. We tested this prediction with a late bilingual Hungarian (first language, L1)-English (second language, L2) speaker J.B. who had nonfluent progressive aphasia (NFPA). J.B. had acquired L2 in adolescence but was premorbidly proficient and used English as his dominant language throughout adult life. Our investigations showed comparable deterioration to lexical and grammatical knowledge in both languages during a one-year period. Parallel deterioration to language processing in a bilingual speaker with NFPA challenges the assumption that L1 and L2 rely on different brain mechanisms as assumed in some theories of bilingual language processing [Ullman, M. T. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(1), 105-122].


Subject(s)
Aphasia/psychology , Emigrants and Immigrants , Language , Multilingualism , Neuropsychological Tests , Speech , Vocabulary , Adolescent , Aged , Aphasia/etiology , Aphasia/pathology , Aphasia/physiopathology , Brain/pathology , Brain/physiopathology , Comprehension , Dementia/complications , Dementia/psychology , England , Humans , Hungary , Linguistics , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Reading , Writing
3.
Behav Neurol ; 25(3): 185-91, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22713383

ABSTRACT

We report a patient with non-fluent Primary Progressive Aphasia who was premorbidly literate in two alphabetic scripts, Hungarian (L1) and English (L2). Testing was performed over a two-year period to assess the impact of progressive illness on oral reading and repetition of single words. Results showed significant decline in oral reading in both languages, and an effect of language status in favour of oral reading in L1. Phonological complexity was a significant predictor of oral reading decline in both languages. Of interest, we observed an effect of language status on task performance whereby repetition was better in L2 than L1 but oral reading was better in L1 than L2. We conclude that language status has an effect on repetition and oral reading abilities for bilingual speakers with non-fluent Primary Progressive Aphasia.


Subject(s)
Dyslexia, Acquired/physiopathology , Primary Progressive Nonfluent Aphasia/physiopathology , Reading , Aged , Humans , Language Tests , Linguistics , Male , Multilingualism , Speech Perception/physiology
4.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev ; 35(3): 407-26, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20451552

ABSTRACT

In the past 30 years there has been a growing body of research using different methods (behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological, TMS and imaging studies) asking whether processing words from different grammatical classes (especially nouns and verbs) engage different neural systems. To date, however, each line of investigation has provided conflicting results. Here we present a review of this literature, showing that once we take into account the confounding in most studies between semantic distinctions (objects vs. actions) and grammatical distinction (nouns vs. verbs), and the conflation between studies concerned with mechanisms of single word processing and those studies concerned with sentence integration, the emerging picture is relatively clear-cut: clear neural separability is observed between the processing of object words (nouns) and action words (typically verbs), grammatical class effects emerge or become stronger for tasks and languages imposing greater processing demands. These findings indicate that grammatical class per se is not an organisational principle of knowledge in the brain; rather, all the findings we review are compatible with two general principles described by typological linguistics as underlying grammatical class membership across languages: semantic/pragmatic, and distributional cues in language that distinguish nouns from verbs. These two general principles are incorporated within an emergentist view which takes these constraints into account.


Subject(s)
Brain Mapping , Brain/physiology , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Electrophysiology , Language , Neuropsychological Tests , Animals , Brain/anatomy & histology , Humans
5.
Cortex ; 45(6): 738-58, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19027106

ABSTRACT

We re-examine the double dissociation view of noun-verb differences by critically reviewing past lesion studies reporting selective noun or verb deficits in picture naming, and reporting the results of a new picture naming study carried out with aphasic patients and comparison participants. Since there are theoretical arguments and empirical evidence that verb processing is more demanding than noun processing, in the review we distinguished between cases that presented with large and small differences between nouns and verbs. We argued that the latter cases may be accounted for in terms of greater difficulty in processing verbs than nouns. For the cases reporting large differences between nouns and verbs we assessed consistency in lesion localization and consistency in diagnostic classification. More variability both in terms of diagnostic category and lesion sites was found among the verb impaired than the noun impaired patients. In the experimental study, nine aphasic patients and nine age matched neurologically unimpaired individuals carried out a picture naming study that used a large set of materials matched for age of acquisition and in addition to accuracy measures, latencies were also recorded. Despite the patients' variable language deficits, diagnostic category and the matched materials, all patients performed faster and more accurately in naming the object than the action pictures. The comparison participants performed similarly. We also carried out a qualitative analysis of the errors patients made and showed that different types of errors were made in response to object and action pictures. We concluded that action naming places more and different demands on the language processor than object naming. The conclusions of the literature review and the results of the experimental study are discussed in relation to claims previous studies have made on the basis of the double dissociation found between nouns and verbs. We argue that these claims are only justified when it can be shown that the impairments to the two categories occur for the same underlying reason and that the differences between the two categories are large.


Subject(s)
Aphasia/physiopathology , Brain Damage, Chronic/physiopathology , Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology , Semantics , Verbal Behavior/physiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Aphasia/classification , Aphasia/complications , Brain Damage, Chronic/complications , Case-Control Studies , Classification , Female , Humans , Male , Matched-Pair Analysis , Middle Aged , Photic Stimulation , Reference Values , Severity of Illness Index , Vocabulary
6.
J Child Lang ; 35(2): 373-402, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18416864

ABSTRACT

The objectives were to explore the often reported noun advantage in children's language acquisition using a picture naming paradigm and to explore the variables that affect picture naming performance. Participants in Experiment 1 were aged three and five years, and in Experiment 2, five years. The stimuli were action and object pictures. In Experiment 1, action pictures produced more errors than object pictures for the three-year-olds, but not the five-year-olds. A qualitative analysis of the errors revealed a somewhat different pattern of errors across age groups. In Experiment 2 there was no robust difference in accuracy for the actions and objects but naming times were longer for actions. Across both experiments, imageability was a robust predictor of object naming performance, while spoken frequency was the most important predictor of action naming. The results are discussed in terms of possible differences in the manner in which nouns and verbs are acquired.


Subject(s)
Child Language , Verbal Behavior , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Verbal Learning , Visual Perception
7.
Cortex ; 43(7): 921-34, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17941350

ABSTRACT

The study addresses the issue of the selective preservation of verbs in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Twenty three AD patients and age-matched controls named pictures of objects and actions and took part in a word-picture verification task. The results for picture naming revealed that both patients and controls were faster and produced more target responses for objects than actions. In the comprehension task, accuracy levels were comparable for nouns and verbs, but response times were longer for verbs. Although patients were more error prone and had longer latencies in both tasks than controls, the only qualitative difference in performance between the groups was in response to trials with semantically related foils in the word-picture verification task. Patients were particularly error prone in this condition. We conclude that the results do not provide support for the notion that verbs are selectively preserved in AD. They also do not provide conclusive evidence for claims that depressed naming and comprehension is (always) due to loss of semantic knowledge or inadequate access to semantic knowledge. Finally, we discuss the findings in relation to comparable investigations in patients with semantic dementia.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/complications , Language Disorders/complications , Recognition, Psychology/physiology , Semantics , Verbal Behavior/physiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Case-Control Studies , Chi-Square Distribution , Humans , Language Tests , Matched-Pair Analysis , Reaction Time/physiology , Reference Values
8.
Brain Lang ; 98(3): 332-40, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16843522

ABSTRACT

The present study compared object and action naming in patients with Alzheimer's dementia. We tested the hypothesis put forward in (some) previous studies that in Alzheimer's dementia the production of verbs, that is required in action naming, is better preserved than the production of nouns, that is required in object naming. The possible reason for the dissociation is that verbs are supported predominantly by frontal brain structures that may remain relatively better preserved in early Alzheimer's disease. Objects, on the other hand, are supported by temporal lobe structures that are affected early in the disease. An alternative hypothesis, which is supported by other studies, is that action naming is more impaired than object naming due to verbs being semantically more complex than nouns. In order to test these contrasting hypotheses, the present study used more stringent methodology than previous studies. We used a larger set of stimuli with carefully matched object and action items and we collected not only accuracy data but also naming latencies, a measure that is sensitive to even mild lexical retrieval problems. We compared the performance of 19 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease with that of 19 healthy age matched participants. We found that both the patients and the comparison group responded faster and made fewer errors on the object pictures than the action pictures. A qualitative analysis of the naming errors indicated that object and action naming pose different demands for the language system. The results overall suggest that the patients' performance is an exaggeration of the pattern present in the comparison participants.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Names , Semantics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Reaction Time , Severity of Illness Index
9.
Brain Lang ; 94(1): 1-18, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15896379

ABSTRACT

The case of an aphasic patient whose spontaneous speech contains very few lexical verbs is reported. Instead of sentences with lexical verbs, the patient produces many (grammatical) copular constructions. He also substitutes lexical verbs with the copula. Although this results in ungrammatical utterances, by doing so, a resemblance of sentence structure and a degree of grammaticality of his utterances are preserved. Although the patient is more impaired in naming action than object pictures, it is unlikely that lexical retrieval difficulties are solely responsible for the paucity of lexical verbs in his speech. A series of tests revealed a profound deficit in producing tense marking inflections and in understanding their significance. We argue that the unavailability of tense features is the primary reason for the lack of lexical verbs in his speech. An alternative possibility, that the tense deficit interacts with the verb retrieval deficit, is also discussed. The patient has a complex lesion and language profile, with features associated with both Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. However, since the study focuses on his verb and tense deficits and the grammaticality of his utterances, issues that are often discussed in relation to agrammatic Broca's aphasia, the literature that is relevant to these topics and to Broca's aphasia is reviewed, despite the different diagnostic profile of the patient.


Subject(s)
Aphasia, Broca/physiopathology , Aphasia, Wernicke/physiopathology , Semantics , Speech , Aphasia, Broca/pathology , Aphasia, Wernicke/pathology , Frontal Lobe/pathology , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Parietal Lobe/pathology , Severity of Illness Index , Temporal Lobe/pathology
10.
Cogn Neuropsychol ; 19(3): 207-44, 2002 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20957538

ABSTRACT

We describe the reading performance of a patient who has selective deficits for reading nonwords, function words, and morphologically complex words in isolation. His reading of highly abstract nouns and verbs, however, is relatively well preserved. He can recognise and comprehend the meaning of written function words, of derivational morphology, and of most inflectional morphology. We suggest that his deficit in reading grammatical morphemes is unrelated to his problems in reading nonwords and cannot be explained by their low semanticity and imageability. The patient's speech is ungrammatical but is not devoid of grammatical morphemes and his reading of functional elements improves when these are presented within the context of sentences. We argue that syntactic information relevant to individual lexical items including information about how the word may potentially be used within a phrase must be accessed during single word reading tasks (e.g., Levelt, 1989). This is particularly difficult for function words due to their linguistic specification, which is different from that of lexical categories (Chomsky, 1995). Both linguistic theory and Garrett's (e.g., 1982) model of sentence processing account for the patient's improved reading of function words in the context of sentences.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...