Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Sport Sci ; 23(6): 925-935, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35418276

ABSTRACT

Since the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the community use of facemasks has been widely recommended. However, their use during exercise has raised safety concerns. Thus, we compared the physiological differences between exercising wearing a surgical (SM) or a double-layer-cotton (DLC) facemask and not wearing a mask (NM). Sixteen volunteers underwent 4 bouts of cycling-based exercise, which consisted of two different intensities: light-to-moderate and moderate-to-high. Facemasks were used as follows: bout-1 and 4: NM; bout-2: SM or DLC and bout-3: DLC or SM. Ventilatory, metabolic, pulmonary gas exchange (PGE) and perceptual variables were collected. At both exercise intensities compared to NM, both facemasks induced similar ventilatory adaptations, increasing inspiratory time and tidal volume and decreasing breathing frequency. Effect sizes (ES) were larger for DLC than for SM. At moderate-to-high, both facemasks reduced the minute ventilation, whereas at light-to-moderate, it was only seen with DLC. End tidal and mixed CO2 pressures, as well as the difference between them, increased with both facemasks. Again, ES was larger for DLC than SM. No relevant oxygen saturation drop was observed with both facemaks and exercise intensities. A small ES increament in VO2 and VCO2 were seen with both facemasks. Effort perception increased at moderate-to-high for both exercise intensities, buth larger EF were with DLC than SM . DLC increased facial temperature during both exercise intensities. In conclusion, ventilatory adjustments imposed during facemask exercise influenced PGE and metabolic and perceptual changes. Larger ES were mostly seen for DLC than SM.Abbreviations: Bf: Breathing frequency.; CPET: Cardiopulmonary exercise test.; CI: Confidence interval.; DLC: Double-layer cotton.; ETCO2: End tidal CO2 pressure.; ES: Effect size.; ΔET-PECO2: Difference between ETCO2 and PECO2.; FMMT: Facemask microclimate temperature.; HR: Heart rate.; IQR: Interquartile range.; NM: No mask.; PECO2: Mixed-expired CO2 pressure.; RER: Respiratory exchange ratio.; RPE: Rate of perceived effort.; SD: Standard deviation.; SM: Surgical Mask.; SpO2: Oxygen saturation.; STP: Subjective thermal perception.; Ti/TTOT: Duty cycle.; VE: Minute ventilation.; VCO2: Carbon dioxide output.; VO2: Oxygen uptake.; VT: Tidal volume.; VT: Ventilatory threshold.HighlightsFacemasks affect the breathing pattern by changing the frequency and amplitude of pulmonary ventilation.The augmented ventilatory work increases VO2, VCO2, and RPE and promotes nonconcerning drops in SpO2 and CO2 retention.Increased inspiratory and expiratory pressure can account for the reduction in pulmonary physiological dead space.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Carbon Dioxide , Humans , Carbon Dioxide/metabolism , Masks , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , Respiration , Exercise Test
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...