Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 40
Filter
2.
Psychol Med ; 41(8): 1751-61, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21134315

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim was to examine barriers to initiation and continuation of treatment among individuals with common mental disorders in the US general population. METHOD: Respondents in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication with common 12-month DSM-IV mood, anxiety, substance, impulse control and childhood disorders were asked about perceived need for treatment, structural barriers and attitudinal/evaluative barriers to initiation and continuation of treatment. RESULTS: Low perceived need was reported by 44.8% of respondents with a disorder who did not seek treatment. Desire to handle the problem on one's own was the most common reason among respondents with perceived need both for not seeking treatment (72.6%) and for dropping out of treatment (42.2%). Attitudinal/evaluative factors were much more important than structural barriers both to initiating (97.4% v. 22.2%) and to continuing (81.9% v. 31.8%) of treatment. Reasons for not seeking treatment varied with illness severity. Low perceived need was a more common reason for not seeking treatment among individuals with mild (57.0%) than moderate (39.3%) or severe (25.9%) disorders, whereas structural and attitudinal/evaluative barriers were more common among respondents with more severe conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Low perceived need and attitudinal/evaluative barriers are the major barriers to treatment seeking and staying in treatment among individuals with common mental disorders. Efforts to increase treatment seeking and reduce treatment drop-out need to take these barriers into consideration as well as to recognize that barriers differ as a function of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
3.
Mol Psychiatry ; 14(7): 728-37, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18283278

ABSTRACT

This study presents national data on the comparative role impairments of common mental and chronic medical disorders in the general population. These data come from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, a nationally representative household survey. Disorder-specific role impairment was assessed with the Sheehan Disability Scales, a multidimensional instrument that asked respondents to attribute impairment to particular conditions. Overall impairment was significantly higher for mental than chronic medical disorders in 74% of pair-wise comparisons between the two groups of conditions, and severe impairment was reported by a significantly higher portion of persons with mental disorders (42.0%) than chronic medical disorders (24.4%). However, treatment was provided for a significantly lower proportion of mental (21.4%) than chronic medical (58.2%) disorders. Although mental disorders were associated with comparable or higher impairment than chronic medical conditions in all domains of function, they showed different patterns of deficits; whereas chronic medical disorders were most likely to be associated with impairment in domains of work and home functioning, mental disorders were most commonly associated with problems in social and close-relation domains. Comorbidity between chronic medical and mental disorders significantly increased the reported impairment associated with each type of disorder. The results indicate a serious mismatch between a high degree of impairment and a low rate of treatment for mental disorders in the United States. Efforts to reduce disability will need to address the disproportionate burden and distinct patterns of deficits of mental disorders and the potentially synergistic impact of comorbid mental and chronic medical disorders.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Disability Evaluation , Health Surveys , Humans , Prevalence , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Severity of Illness Index , Socioeconomic Factors , United States/epidemiology
5.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 58(9): 861-8, 2001 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11545670

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This randomized trial evaluated an integrated model of primary medical care for a cohort of patients with serious mental disorders. METHODS: A total of 120 individuals enrolled in a Veterans Affairs (VA) mental health clinic were randomized to receive primary medical care through an integrated care initiative located in the mental health clinic (n = 59) or through the VA general medicine clinic (n = 61). Veterans who obtained care in the integrated care clinic received on-site primary care and case management that emphasized preventive medical care, patient education, and close collaboration with mental health providers to improve access to and continuity of care. Analyses compared health process (use of medical services, quality of care, and satisfaction) and outcomes (health and mental health status and costs) between the groups in the year after randomization. RESULTS: Patients treated in the integrated care clinic were significantly more likely to have made a primary care visit and had a greater mean number of primary care visits than those in the usual care group. They were more likely to have received 15 of the 17 preventive measures outlined in clinical practice guidelines. Patients assigned to the integrated care clinic had a significantly greater improvement in health as measured by the physical component summary score of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey than patients assigned to the general medicine clinic (4.7 points vs -0.3 points, P<.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in any of the measures of mental health symptoms or in total health care costs. CONCLUSION: On-site, integrated primary care was associated with improved quality and outcomes of medical care.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/methods , Health Services Research/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Adult , Cohort Studies , Continuity of Patient Care/standards , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/psychology , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Preventive Health Services/standards , Preventive Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/methods , Primary Health Care/standards , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
6.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 58(6): 565-72, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11386985

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether differences in quality of medical care might explain a portion of the excess mortality associated with mental disorders in the year after myocardial infarction. METHODS: This study examined a national cohort of 88 241 Medicare patients 65 years and older who were hospitalized for clinically confirmed acute myocardial infarction. Proportional hazard models compared the association between mental disorders and mortality before and after adjusting 5 established quality indicators: reperfusion, aspirin, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and smoking cessation counseling. All models adjusted for eligibility for each procedure, demographic characteristics, cardiac risk factors and history, admission characteristics, left ventricular function, hospital characteristics, and regional factors. RESULTS: After adjusting for the potential confounding factors, presence of any mental disorder was associated with a 19% increase in 1-year risk of mortality (hazard ratios [HR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.36). After adding the 5 quality measures to the model, the association was no longer significant (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.96-1.26). Similarly, while schizophrenia (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.01-1.67) and major affective disorders (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.20) were each initially associated with increased mortality, after adding the quality variables, neither schizophrenia (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.86-1.60) nor major affective disorder (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.87-1.23) remained a significant predictor. CONCLUSIONS: Deficits in quality of medical care seemed to explain a substantial portion of the excess mortality experienced by patients with mental disorders after myocardial infarction. The study suggests the potential importance of improving these patients' medical care as a step toward reducing their excess mortality.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Mental Disorders/mortality , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Quality of Health Care , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Age Factors , Aged , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Cluster Analysis , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Medicare , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Myocardial Reperfusion , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Smoking Cessation , Ventricular Function, Left
7.
Am J Psychiatry ; 158(5): 731-4, 2001 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11329394

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The relationship of depressive symptoms, satisfaction with health care, and 2-year work outcomes was examined in a national cohort of employees. METHOD: A total of 6,239 employees of three corporations completed surveys on health and satisfaction with health care in 1993 and 1995. This study used bivariate and multivariate analyses to examine the relationships of depressive symptoms (a score below 43 on the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey mental component summary), satisfaction with a variety of dimensions of health care in 1993, and work outcomes (sick days and decreased effectiveness in the workplace) in 1995. RESULTS: The odds of missed work due to health problems in 1995 were twice as high for employees with depressive symptoms in both 1993 and 1995 as for those without depressive symptoms in either year. The odds of decreased effectiveness at work in 1995 was seven times as high. Among individuals with depressive symptoms in 1993, a report of one or more problems with clinical care in 1993 predicted a 34% increase in the odds of persistent depressive symptoms and a 66% increased odds of decreased effectiveness at work in 1995. There was a weaker association between problems with plan administration and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Depressive disorders in the workplace persist over time and have a major effect on work performance, most notably on "presenteeism," or reduced effectiveness in the workplace. The study's findings suggest a potentially important link between consumers' perceptions of clinical care and work outcomes in this population.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/standards , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Efficiency , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/standards , Personal Satisfaction , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , Workload , Adult , Cohort Studies , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Female , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/statistics & numerical data , Health Status , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Task Performance and Analysis , United States , Work/standards
8.
Am J Epidemiol ; 153(3): 299-306, 2001 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11157418

ABSTRACT

Few studies have addressed the accuracy of self-reported cancer history, although epidemiologic studies routinely use self-reported information as the sole source of exposure or outcome data or as a criterion for exclusion from study participation. In this paper, false-negative reporting of cancer history is examined in a community-based sample by comparing interview data with tumor registry records. Subjects were participants in the 1980 New Haven Epidemiologic Catchment Area study; in 1995, cancer records (from 1935 onward) were obtained by linking the sample to the Connecticut Tumor Registry. Analyses focused on 263 individuals who had at least one tumor reported to the Connecticut Tumor Registry prior to participation in the Epidemiologic Catchment Area study. The overall rate of false-negative reporting was 39.2%. Logistic regression analysis revealed that false-negative reporting was significantly associated with non-White race, older age, increased time since cancer diagnosis, number of previous tumors, and type of cancer treatment received. In addition, false-negative reporting varied widely by cancer site, ranging from 0% for melanoma skin cancer to 83.3% for central nervous system cancers. The false-negative rate for breast cancer was 20.8%, that for colon and prostate cancers was 42.1%, and that for bladder cancer was 61.5%. Implications of these findings for prevalence estimation and future epidemiologic studies are discussed.


Subject(s)
Medical Records/standards , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Registries/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Connecticut/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sex Distribution
9.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 20(6): 233-41, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11816664

ABSTRACT

Using a nationally representative sample of 23,230 U.S. residents, we examine patterns of economic burden across five chronic conditions: mood disorders, diabetes, heart disease, asthma, and hypertension. Almost half of U.S. health care costs in 1996 were borne by persons with one or more of these five conditions; of that spending amount, only about one-quarter was spent on treating the conditions themselves and the remainder on coexistent illnesses. Each condition demonstrated substantial economic burden but also unique characteristics and patterns of service use driving those costs. The findings highlight the differing challenges involved in understanding needs and improving care across particular chronic conditions.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/economics , Cost of Illness , Health Expenditures , Absenteeism , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Asthma/economics , Asthma/epidemiology , Chronic Disease/classification , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Data Collection , Diabetes Mellitus/economics , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Health Policy , Heart Diseases/economics , Heart Diseases/epidemiology , Humans , Hypertension/economics , Hypertension/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Mood Disorders/economics , Mood Disorders/epidemiology , Prevalence , United States/epidemiology
10.
Am J Psychiatry ; 157(9): 1485-91, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10964866

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study characterized the prevalence, characteristics, and impact of mental and general medical disabilities in the United States. METHOD: The 1994-1995 National Health Interview Survey of Disability was the largest disability survey ever conducted in the United States. A national sample was screened for disability, defined as limitation or inability to participate in a major life activity. Analyses compared cohorts who attributed their disability to physical, mental, or combined conditions. RESULTS: Of 106,573 adults, 1.1% reported functional disability from mental conditions, 4.8% from general medical conditions, and 1.2% from combined mental and general medical conditions. Disabilities attributed to a mental condition were predominantly associated with social and cognitive difficulties, those attributed to general medical conditions with physical limitations, and combined disabilities with deficits spanning multiple domains. In multivariate models, comorbid medical and mental conditions were associated with a twofold increase in odds of unemployment and a two-thirds increase in odds of support on disability payments compared to respondents with a single form of disability. More than half the nonworking disabled reported that economic, social, and job-based barriers contributed to their inability to work. One-fourth of working disabled people reported discrimination on the basis of their disability during the past 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: An estimated three million Americans (one-third of disabled people) reported that a mental condition contributes to their disability. Mental, general medical, and combined conditions are associated with unique patterns of functional impairment. Social and economic factors and job discrimination may exacerbate the functional impairments resulting from clinical syndromes.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Comorbidity , Cost of Illness , Educational Status , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Prejudice , Prevalence , Public Policy , Social Security/economics , Social Welfare/economics , Stereotyping , Surveys and Questionnaires , Unemployment/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology
11.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 57(7): 708-14, 2000 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10891042

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, this study provides the first national estimates for use of practitioner-based complementary treatments by US residents reporting mental conditions. METHODS: A total of 16038 respondents to the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey were asked about visits for 12 complementary medical services (eg, chiropractic services and herbal remedies). Bivariate and multiple regression models examined use of these therapies in individuals reporting a mental condition (n= 1803), fair or poor mental health status (n=992), and 1 of 4 chronic medical conditions (n = 3262) and in the remainder of the sample (n= 10 793). RESULTS: A total of 9.8% of those reporting a mental condition made a complementary visit, and about half of these (4.5%) made a visit to treat the mental condition. Persons reporting transient stress or adjustment disorders were most likely (odds ratio, 9.1%; 95% confidence interval, 5.5%-12.7%), and those with psychotic (odds ratio, 1.5%; 95% confidence interval, 0.0%-4.2%) and affective (odds ratio, 2.6%; 95% confidence interval, 1.5%-3.8%) conditions least likely, to use complementary therapies to treat their mental condition. In multivariate models controlling for medical comorbidity, fair or poor mental health status, and demographic factors, report of a mental condition predicted a 1.27-fold increase in the odds of a complementary visit (95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.54). CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported mental conditions were associated with increased use of complementary treatments, although use of these treatments was concentrated in respondents with transient distress rather than chronic and serious conditions. More research using structured diagnostic interviews is needed to examine the prevalence, patterns, and clinical implications of use of these treatments by individuals with mental conditions in "real world" community settings.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Adult , Complementary Therapies/economics , Female , Health Care Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Health Status , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Probability , Regression Analysis , United States/epidemiology
12.
Am J Psychiatry ; 157(8): 1274-8, 2000 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10910790

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Employers are playing an increasingly influential role in determining the scope and character of health coverage in the United States. This study compares the health and disability costs of depressive illness with those of four other chronic conditions among employees of a large U.S. corporation. METHOD: Data from the health and employee files of 15,153 employees of a major U.S. corporation who filed health claims in 1995 were examined. Analyses compared the mental health costs, medical costs, sick days, and total health and disability costs associated with depression and four other conditions: heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, and back problems. Regression models were used to control for demographic differences and job characteristics. RESULTS: Employees treated for depression incurred annual per capita health and disability costs of $5,415, significantly more than the cost for hypertension and comparable to the cost for the three other medical conditions. Employees with depressive illness plus any of the other conditions cost 1.7 times more than those with the comparison medical conditions alone. Depressive illness was associated with a mean of 9.86 annual sick days, significantly more than any of the other conditions. Depressed employees under the age of 40 years took 3.5 more annual sick days than those 40 years old or older. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of depression to employers, particularly the cost in lost work days, is as great or greater than the cost of many other common medical illnesses, and the combination of depressive and other common illnesses is particularly costly. The strong association between depressive illness and sick days in younger workers suggests that the impact of depression may increase as these workers age.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Depressive Disorder/economics , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Absenteeism , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Back Pain/economics , Chronic Disease , Comorbidity , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/economics , Female , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/statistics & numerical data , Heart Diseases/economics , Humans , Hypertension/economics , Insurance, Disability/economics , Insurance, Disability/statistics & numerical data , Male , Managed Care Programs , Middle Aged , Sick Leave/economics , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data
13.
Psychiatr Serv ; 51(7): 890-2, 2000 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10875953

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological surveys suggest that half of mental disorders in the community are treated in general medical settings. This paper examines delivery of mental health services in psychiatric, primary care, and specialty medical clinics in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the largest integrated public-sector health care system in the United States. METHODS: The study examined all outpatient visits to VA clinics between October 1996 and March 1998, a time during which VA policy promoted a shift to a primary care model. For veterans with a primary diagnosis of a mental or substance use disorder who made any visit to a VA psychiatric, primary care, or specialty medical clinic, we compared the locus of care and case mix as well as changes in treatment patterns during the study period. RESULTS: Of 437,035 veterans treated for a mental disorder during the final six months of the study period, only 7 percent were seen for their mental disorders exclusively in primary care and specialty medical clinics. Compared with veterans with mental disorders treated in specialty mental health clinics, those treated in medical clinics had less serious psychiatric diagnoses and made fewer visits. While there was a substantial shift of care from specialty to primary care during the study period, no comparable change in the distribution of care between medical and mental health settings was found. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment patterns in VA clinics differ markedly from those in the private sector. Research is needed to determine whether and how staffing models developed in HMOs and community samples should be extended to these public-sector settings.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Community Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/statistics & numerical data , Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Diagnosis-Related Groups , Family Practice/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Specialization , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
14.
Arch Intern Med ; 160(10): 1522-6, 2000 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10826468

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study examines the association between the presence of a general medical illness and suicidality in a representative sample of US young adults. METHODS: Between 1988 and 1994, 7589 individuals aged 17 to 39 years were administered the Diagnostic Interview Schedule as part of a national probability survey. The survey collected information about lifetime suicidal ideation and suicide attempts, a checklist of common general medical conditions, and data on major depression, alcohol use, and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Whereas 16.3% of respondents described suicidal ideation at some point in their lives, 25.2% of individuals with a general medical condition, and 35.0% of those with 2 or more medical illnesses reported life-time suicidal ideation. Similarly, whereas 5.5% of respondents had made a suicide attempt, 8.9% of those with a general medical illness and 16.2% of those with 2 or more medical conditions had attempted suicide. In models controlling for major depression, depressive symptoms, alcohol use, and demographic characteristics, presence of a general medical condition predicted a 1.3 times increase in likelihood of suicidal ideation; more specifically, pulmonary diseases (asthma, bronchitis) were associated with a two-thirds increase in the odds of lifetime suicidal ideation. Cancer and asthma were each associated with a more than 4-fold increase in the likelihood of a suicide attempt. CONCLUSIONS: A significant association was found between medical conditions and suicidality that persisted after adjusting for depressive illness and alcohol use. The findings support the need to screen for suicidality in general medical settings, over and above use of general depression instruments.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/psychology , Suicide, Attempted/psychology , Suicide/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Likelihood Functions , Male , Personality Assessment , Risk , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical data , United States
15.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 61(3): 234-7; quiz 238-9, 2000 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10817113

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies have reported disturbingly low rates of treatment for major depression in the United States. To better understand this phenomenon, we studied the prevalence and predictors of antidepressant treatment in a national sample of individuals with major depression. METHOD: Between 1988 and 1994, 7589 individuals, aged 17-39 years and drawn from a national probability sample, were administered the Diagnostic Interview Schedule as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Interviewers asked about prescription drug use and checked medication bottles to record the name and type of medications. RESULTS: A total of 312 individuals, or 4.1% of the sample, met DSM-III criteria for current major depression. Only 7.4% of those with current major depression were being treated with an antidepressant. Among individuals with current major depression, being insured and having a primary care provider each predicted a 4-fold increase in odds of antidepressant treatment; telling the primary provider about depressive symptoms predicted a 10-fold increase in treatment. CONCLUSION: The study's findings support the notion that a serious gap exists between the established efficacy of antidepressant medications and rates of treatment for major depression in the "real world." Underreporting of depressive symptoms to providers and problems with access to general medical care appear to be 2 major contributors to this problem.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Antidepressive Agents/administration & dosage , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization , Female , Health Services Research , Health Surveys , Humans , Insurance, Health , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Prevalence , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , United States/epidemiology
17.
JAMA ; 283(4): 506-11, 2000 Jan 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10659877

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: A number of studies have found race- and sex-based differences in rates of cardiovascular procedures in the United States. Similarly, mental disorders might be expected to be associated with lower rates of such procedures on the basis of clinical, socioeconomic, patient, and provider factors. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether having a comorbid mental disorder is associated with a lower likelihood of cardiac catheterization and/or revascularization after acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using data from medical charts and administrative files as part of the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. SETTING: Acute care nongovernmental hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: National cohort of 113653 eligible patients 65 years or older who were hospitalized for confirmed acute myocardial infarction between February 1994 and July 1995. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Likelihood of cardiac catheterization, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery during the index hospitalization, comparing patients with and without mental disorders (classified as schizophrenia, major affective disorder, substance abuse/dependence disorder, or other mental disorder). RESULTS: Compared with the remainder of the sample, patients with any comorbid mental disorder (n = 5365; 4.7%) were significantly less likely to undergo PTCA (11.8% vs 16.8%; P<.001) or CABG (8.2% vs 12.6%; P<.001). After adjusting for demographic, clinical, hospital, and regional factors, individuals with mental disorders were 41% (for schizophrenia) to 78% (for substance use) as likely to undergo cardiac catheterization as those without mental disorders (P<.001 for all). Among those undergoing catheterization, rates of PTCA or CABG for patients with mental disorders were not significantly different from rates for patients without mental disorders (for those with any mental disorder, P = .12 for PTCA and P = .06 for CABG). In multivariate models, the 30-day mortality did not differ between patients with and without mental disorders. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, individuals with comorbid mental disorders were substantially less likely to undergo coronary revascularization procedures than those without mental disorders. Further research is needed to understand the degree to which patient and provider factors contribute to this difference and its implications for quality and long-term outcomes of care.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/statistics & numerical data , Cardiac Catheterization/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Bypass/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Aged , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Survival Analysis , United States
18.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 19(1): 203-9, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10645088

ABSTRACT

This DataWatch uses data from the 1993 Employee Health Care Value Survey (EHCVS) to compare the experiences of respondents with and without chronic illnesses under managed care. After controlling for potential confounders, we found that chronic illness was associated with increased odds of dissatisfaction in both independent practice association plans and prepaid group practices, but not under fee-for-service coverage. Chronic illness appeared to exacerbate difficulties and to attenuate the benefits experienced by healthy persons under managed care. We conclude that persons with chronic illnesses may be at particular risk under managed care; their experiences may warrant particular attention when health plan performance is being monitored.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/psychology , Managed Care Programs/standards , Patient Satisfaction , Adult , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Fee-for-Service Plans/standards , Female , Health Services Research , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Needs Assessment , New England , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors
20.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 60(10): 664-7, 1999 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10549682

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As admission criteria to inpatient units become more focused on patient safety and behavioral instability, primary treatment often requires use of medications that need to be quick, safe, and effective for control of agitation. This article reviews the evidence that droperidol may serve as the optimal medication for this task. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive MEDLINE search of English-language literature was conducted using the search term droperidol concerning the use of droperidol in psychiatric emergencies. Cross-referencing of those articles was conducted to include pertinent articles in the non-psychiatric and European literature regarding safety and early development of the drug. STUDY FINDINGS: As evidenced in the animal and clinical literature, studies demonstrate the efficacy and rapidity of onset of droperidol and its relative safety compared with the most widely used antiagitation drug, haloperidol. Evidence for this use of droperidol is particularly compelling for situations in which intramuscular administration is necessary. CONCLUSION: Droperidol, while not in widespread use, may prove to be the superior typical neuroleptic for psychiatric emergencies. Increased clinical utilization and study of droperidol for this use is warranted.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Dangerous Behavior , Droperidol/therapeutic use , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Psychomotor Agitation/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Animals , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Clinical Trials as Topic , Crisis Intervention , Droperidol/administration & dosage , Droperidol/adverse effects , Emergency Services, Psychiatric , Haloperidol/administration & dosage , Haloperidol/therapeutic use , Humans , Injections, Intramuscular , Mental Disorders/psychology , Rats
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...