Stereotactic radiosurgery for Koos grade IV vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a well-established treatment option for Koos stage I-III vestibular schwannomas (VS), often used as the first line of treatment or after subtotal resection. However, the optimal treatment for Koos-IV VS remains unclear. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of SRS as a primary treatment for large VS classified as Koos-IV. METHODS: A systematic search was performed on December 28th, 2022, based on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus according to the PRISMA statement. The review was updated on September 7th, 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool. The R software (ver. 4.3.2) was used for all quantitative analyses and preparation of the forest plots. Publication bias and sensitivity analysis were performed to evaluate the reliability of the obtained results. RESULTS: Among 2941 screened records, ten studies (1398 patients) have been included in quantitative synthesis. The overall tumor control rate was 90.7% (95%CI 86.3-94.4). Kaplan-Meier estimates of tumor control at 2, 6, and 10 years were 96.0% (95% CI 92.9-97.6%), 88.8% (95% CI 86.9-89.8%), and 84.5% (95% CI, 81.2-85.8%), respectively. The overall hearing preservation rate was 56.5% (95%CI 37-75.1). Kaplan-Meier estimates of hearing preservation rate at 2, 6, and 10 years were 77.1% (95% CI 67.9-82.5%), 53.5% (95% CI 44.2-58.5%), and 38.1% (95% CI 23.4-40.7%), respectively. The overall facial nerve preservation rate was 100% (95%CI 99.9-100.0). The overall trigeminal neuropathy rate reached 5.7% (95%CI 2.9-9.2). The overall rate of new-onset hydrocephalus was 5.6% (95%CI 3-9). The overall rates of worsening or new-onset tinnitus and vertigo were 6.8% (95%CI 4.2-10.0) and 9.1% (95%CI 2.1-19.6) respectively. No publication bias was detected according to the used methods. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated a high overall tumor control rate, excellent facial nerve preservation, and low incidence of new-onset or worsened tinnitus and vertigo. However, several drawbacks associated with SRS should be noted, such as the presence of post-SRS hydrocephalus risk, mediocre long-term hearing preservation, and the lack of immediate tumor decompression. Nevertheless, the use of SRS may be beneficial in appropriately selected cases of Koos-IV VS. Moreover, further prospective studies directly comparing SRS with surgery are necessary to determine the optimal treatment for large VS and verify our results on a higher level of evidence. Registration and protocol: CRD42023389856.

The application of 3D-bioprinted scaffolds for neuronal regeneration after traumatic spinal cord injury - A systematic review of preclinical in vivo studies.

BACKGROUND: The implantation of 3D-bioprinted scaffolds represents a promising therapeutic approach for traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), currently investigating in preclinical in vivo studies. However, a systematic review of the relevant literature has not been performed to date. Hence, we systematically reviewed the outcomes of the application of 3D-bioprinted implants in the treatment of SCI based on studies conducted on experimental animal models. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Manuscripts in other designs than in vivo preclinical study and written in other languages than English were excluded. A risk of bias assessment was performed using SYRCLE's tool. The quality of included articles was assessed by ARRIVE guidelines. Extracted data were synthesized only qualitatively because the data were not suitable for conducting the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Overall, eleven animal studies reporting on the transection SCI rat model were included. Six of included studies investigated 3D-bioprinted scaffolds enriched with stem cells, two studies - 3D-bioprinted scaffolds combined with growth factors, and three studies - stand-alone 3D-bioprinted scaffolds. In all included studies the application of 3D-bioprinted scaffolds led to significant improvement in functional scores compared with no treated SCI rats. The functional recovery corresponded with the changes observed at the injury site in histological analyses. Seven studies demonstrated medium, three studies - high, and one study - low risk of bias. Moreover, some of the included studies were conducted in the same scientific center. The overall quality assessment ratio amounted to 0.60, which was considered average quality. CONCLUSION: The results of our systematic review suggest that 3D-bioprinted scaffolds may be a feasible therapeutic approach for the treatment of SCI. Further evidence obtained on other experimental SCI models is necessary before the clinical translation of 3D-bioprinted scaffolds.

Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Application of Multipotent Stem Cells for Spinal Cord Injury.

Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) is a common neurological disorder with devastating psychical and psychosocial sequelae. The majority of patients after SCI suffer from permanent disability caused by motor dysfunction, impaired sensation, neuropathic pain, spasticity as well as urinary complications, and a small number of patients experience a complete recovery. Current standard treatment modalities of the SCI aim to prevent secondary injury and provide limited recovery of lost neurological functions. Stem Cell Therapy (SCT) represents an emerging treatment approach using the differentiation, paracrine, and self-renewal capabilities of stem cells to regenerate the injured spinal cord. To date, multipotent stem cells including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), neural stem cells (NSCs), and hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) represent the most investigated types of stem cells for the treatment of SCI in preclinical and clinical studies. The microenvironment of SCI has a significant impact on the survival, proliferation, and differentiation of transplanted stem cells. Therefore, a deep understanding of the pathophysiology of SCI and molecular mechanisms through which stem cells act may help improve the treatment efficacy of SCT and find new therapeutic approaches such as stem-cell-derived exosomes, gene-modified stem cells, scaffolds, and nanomaterials. In this literature review, the pathogenesis of SCI and molecular mechanisms of action of multipotent stem cells including MSCs, NSCs, and HSCs are comprehensively described. Moreover, the clinical efficacy of multipotent stem cells in SCI treatment, an optimal protocol of stem cell administration, and recent therapeutic approaches based on or combined with SCT are also discussed.