Antigen-presenting cells in human periodontal disease tissues.

T cells are present in the inflammatory infiltrates of periodontal disease lesions and require antigen presentation by antigen-presenting cells (APCs). While it is still not known whether Th1 or Th2 cells predominate in these lesions, it has been reported that different APCs may induce activation of different T-cell subsets. An immunoperoxidase technique was used to investigate the presence of CD1a+, CMRF-44+, CMRF-58+ and CD83+ dendritic cells, CD14+ macrophages or dendritic cell precursors and CD19+ B cells in gingival biopsies from 21 healthy or gingivitis and 25 periodontitis subjects. The samples were divided into three groups according to the size of infiltrate (group 1, small infiltrates; group 2, medium infiltrates; group 3, extensive infiltrates). The presence of numerous CD1a+ Langerhans cells was noted in the epithelium with no differences between the healthy/gingivitis and periodontitis groups. The percentage of CD83+ dendritic cells in the infiltrates was higher than the percentage of CD1a+, CMRF-44+ or CMRF-58+ dendritic cells. Endothelial cells positive for CD83 were found predominantly in areas adjacent to infiltrating cells, CD83+ dendritic cells being noted in the region of CD83+ endothelium. The percentage of CD14+ cells in the inflammatory infiltrates was similar to that of CD83+ dendritic cells. B cells were the predominant APC in group 2 and 3 tissues. The percentage of B cells in group 3 periodontitis lesions was increased in comparison with group 1 periodontitis tissues and also in comparison with group 3 healthy/gingivitis sections. Functional studies are required to determine the roles of different APC subpopulations in periodontal disease.

Effect of Fusobacterium nucleatum on the T and B cell responses to Porphyromonas gingivalis in a mouse model.

T cell cytokine profiles and specific serum antibody levels in five groups of BALB/c mice immunized with saline alone, viable Fusobacterium nucleatum ATCC 25586, viable Porphyromonas gingivalis ATCC 33277, F. nucleatum followed by P. gingivalis and P. gingivalis followed by F. nucleatum were determined. Splenic CD4 and CD8 cells were examined for intracytoplasmic interleukin (IL)-4, interferon (IFN)-gamma and IL-10 by dual colour flow cytometry and the levels of serum anti-F. nucleatum and anti-P. gingivalis antibodies determined by an ELISA. Both Th1 and Th2 responses were demonstrated by all groups, and while there were slightly lower percentages of cytokine positive T cells in mice injected with F. nucleatum alone compared with the other groups immunized with bacteria, F. nucleatum had no effect on the T cell production of cytokines induced by P. gingivalis in the two groups immunized with both organisms. However, the percentages of cytokine positive CD8 cells were generally significantly higher than those of the CD4 cells. Mice immunized with F. nucleatum alone had high levels of serum anti-F. nucleatum antibodies with very low levels of P. gingivalis antibodies, whereas mice injected with P. gingivalis alone produced anti-P. gingivalis antibodies predominantly. Although the levels of anti-F. nucleatum antibodies in mice injected with F. nucleatum followed by P. gingivalis were the same as in mice immunized with F. nucleatum alone, antibody levels to P. gingivalis were very low. In contrast, mice injected with P. gingivalis followed by F. nucleatum produced equal levels of both anti-P. gingivalis and anti-F. nucleatum antibodies, although at lower levels than the other three groups immunized with bacteria, respectively. Anti-Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Bacteroides forsythus and Prevotella intermedia serum antibody levels were also determined and found to be negligible. In conclusion, F. nucleatum immunization does not affect the splenic T cell cytokine response to P. gingivalis. However, F. nucleatum immunization prior to that of P. gingivalis almost completely inhibited the production of anti-P. gingivalis antibodies while P. gingivalis injection before F. nucleatum demonstrated a partial inhibitory effect by P. gingivalis on antibody production to F. nucleatum. The significance of these results with respect to human periodontal disease is difficult to determine. However, they may explain in part differing responses to P. gingivalis in different individuals who may or may not have had prior exposure to F. nucleatum. Finally, the results suggested that P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum do not induce the production of cross-reactive antibodies to other oral microorganisms.