Knockdown of Y­box­binding protein­1 inhibits the malignant progression of HT­29 colorectal adenocarcinoma cells by reversing epithelial­mesenchymal transition.

Y­box binding protein­1 (YB­1) has been identified as an oncoprotein in various malignancies. The aim of this study was to investigate the biological role of YB­1 and its association with epithelial­to­mesenchymal transition (EMT) in colorectal cancer (CRC). The expression of YB­1 and three EMT­related proteins (E­cadherin, N­cadherin and vimentin) was analyzed in 80 CRC and matched normal tissue samples, by immunohistochemistry. The results indicated that the expression of YB­1 was higher in CRC tissue samples than that in matched normal controls and was significantly correlated with tumor differentiation, tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis and distant metastases. Furthermore, analysis showed that YB­1 expression was negatively correlated with E­cadherin and positively correlated with N­cadherin and vimentin expression. In vitro assays showed that knockdown of YB­1 inhibited the proliferation, apoptosis resistance, invasion and migration of the HT­29 CRC cell line. Of note, following knockdown of YB­1, E­cadherin expression was elevated whereas N­cadherin and vimentin expression was reduced. Taken together, these results suggest that YB­1 promotes the malignant progression of CRC in part through the induction of EMT, and YB­1 may therefore be a potential novel target for CRC treatment.

[Meta-analysis of laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease].

OBJECTIVE: To compare laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF)and Toupet laparoscopic fundoplication (LTF) with respect to treatment outcomes and postoperative complications. METHODS: PubMed, Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplication were included. Outcomes evaluation included occurrences of heartburn, reflux, difficulty swallowing, chest pain, abdominal distention, failure to hiccup, diarrhea, and early complications and degree of patient satisfaction at early (three to six months) and later (one to three years) post-operative periods. RESULTS: Of 939 patients in seven RCTs, 478 received LNF and 461 received LTF. For both groups, control of reflux was good and occurrence of heartburn was similar (P>0.05). A lower incidence of postoperative dysphagia for both early and later post-operative periods, but a higher overall complication rate in early post-operative period were observed in the LTF group (P<0.05). Patient satisfaction was similar (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: LNF and LTF are both safe and effective. The adoption of procedure should be based on the patient status and surgeon experience.