Multi-domain assessment of sports-related and military concussion recovery: A scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: This review explores the literature on multi-domain assessments used in concussion recovery, to inform evidence-based and ecologically valid return-to-play. It asks: What simultaneous, dynamic multi-domain paradigms are used to assess recovery of youth and adults following concussion? METHODS: Five databases were searched (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, SPORTDiscus) until September 30, 2021. Records were limited to those published in peer-reviewed journals, in English, between 2002 and 2021. Included studies were required to describe the assessment of concussion recovery using dynamic paradigms (i.e., requiring sport-like coordination) spanning multiple domains (i.e., physical, cognitive, socio-emotional functioning) simultaneously. RESULTS: 7098 unique articles were identified. 64 were included for analysis, describing 36 unique assessments of 1938 concussed participants. These assessments were deconstructed into their constituent tasks: 13 physical, 17 cognitive, and one socio-emotional. Combinations of these "building blocks" formed the multi-domain assessments. Forty-six studies implemented level walking with a concurrent cognitive task. The most frequently implemented cognitive tasks were 'Q&A' paradigms requiring participants to answer questions aloud during a physical task. CONCLUSIONS: A preference emerged for dual-task assessments, specifically combinations of level walking and Q&A tasks. Future research should balance ecological validity and clinical feasibility in multi-domain assessments, and work to validate these assessments for practice.

R2Play development: Fostering user-driven technology that supports return-to-play decision-making following pediatric concussion.

Objective: To design a multi-domain return-to-play assessment system (R2Play) for youth athletes with concussion. Methods: The R2Play system was developed using an overarching user-centered approach, the Design Thinking Framework, and research activities included: 1) structured brainstorming within our research team, 2) interviews with clinician and youth sports coaches, 3) building a testable prototype, and 4) interface testing through cognitive walkthroughs with clinician partners. Results: Clinician and coach participants provided feedback on the R2Play concept, which was integrated into the design process and provided future directions for research. Examples of feedback-driven design choices included reducing assessment time, increasing ecological validity by adding in background noise, and developing youth-friendly graphical results screens. Following refinement based on stakeholder feedback, the R2Play system was outlined in detail and a testable prototype was developed. It is made up of two parts: a clinician tablet, and a series of tablet "buttons" that display numbers and letters. Youth athletes run between the buttons to connect a "trail" in ascending alphanumeric order, 1-A-2-B, etc. Their performance across a series of levels of increasing difficulty is logged on the clinician tablet. Initial testing with five clinicians showed the system's interface to have excellent usability with a score of 81% (SD = 8.02) on the System Usability Scale. Conclusion: Through this research, a prototype of the R2Play system was innovated and evaluated by clinician and coach stakeholders. Initial usability was excellent and directions for future iterations were highlighted. Outcomes suggest the potential benefits of using technologies to assist in complex clinical assessment, as well as utilizing a user-centered approach to design.