Systematic evaluation of guidelines for laparoscopic surgery and endoscopic management for colon cancer.

PURPOSE: To understand the methodological quality of recent guidelines for laparoscopic surgery and endoscopic management for colon cancer and to analyze the heterogeneity and possible reasons for the main recommendations. METHODS: A systematic and comprehensive search of databases and relevant websites was conducted to collect guidelines for laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in the last 10 years that met the inclusion criteria. The AGREE II manual was used to evaluate the included guidelines and to assess and analyze the heterogeneity and reasons for key recommendations about the surgery. RESULTS: A total of fifteen guidelines were included in this study. Only two guidelines had an overall score greater than 60% and were recommended for clinical use. Eleven guidelines had an overall score of 30-60%, and two guidelines had an overall score of less than 30%. Further analysis of the reasons for heterogeneity in the guideline recommendations and evidence was performed for nine guidelines. This study found that only 36.1% of the evidence levels recommended in the guidelines were high. Significant heterogeneity exists in the main recommendations, mainly because the relevant content is not mentioned or described in detail. CONCLUSION: The quality of guidelines for laparoscopic colon cancer surgery is variable, and there is significant heterogeneity among key recommendations. And the level of evidence underlying the recommendations was generally not high. Further guideline updates should address the causes of the above heterogeneity.

Cholesterol crystals activate NLRP3 inflammasomes and promote gallstone formation by increasing mucin secretion.

Cholesterol crystals participate in cholesterol nucleation; however, the role of cholesterol crystals in gallstone development is unknown. Mucin secretion contributes to increased size of gallstones. Cholesterol crystals activate inflammasomes and participate in many sterile inflammation related human diseases. We investigated the role of cholesterol crystals and mucins in sterile inflammation and gallstone enlargement. We found that expression of mucin 5AC (MUC5AC), NOD-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) and interleukin-1b (IL-1b) was increased significantly in tissues adjacent to gallstones. Experiments in vitro showed that cholesterol crystals promote MUC5AC secretion; they also increase expression of NLRP3, NLR family CARD domain-containing 4 (NLRC4), apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing caspase recruitment domain (ASC), and cleaved caspase-1 in biliary epithelial cells. Inhibition of Inflammasomes by NLRP3, ASC or caspase-1 small interfering RNAs reduced MUC5AC secretion. Also, the IL-1 receptor antagonist, IL1RA, and caspase-1 inhibitor, Ac-YVAD, both inhibited MUC5AC secretion induced by cholesterol crystals. We found that inflammasome activation participates in cholesterol crystal induced mucin secretion and gallstone development.

Systematic evaluation of the diagnostic approach of inflammatory bowel disease guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: To collect and evaluate the diagnostic approach of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) guidelines and provide useful feedback for guideline developers and evidence-based clinical information to help physicians make decisions. METHODS: Diagnostic guidelines for IBD were retrieved by performing systemic and manual searches. Qualified clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) were included and then evaluated by four well-trained evaluators using the AGREE II instrument. To reduce the bias generated in this process, we used the Measurement Scale of Rate of Agreement (MSRA) tool to interpret the results. Guidelines with good recommendation distributions among the diagnostic field were further reclassified and evaluated. RESULTS: Fifteen diagnostic CPGs for IBD were identified and evaluated, and 70.3% (11/15) of the CPGs were above the recommended level. We observed heterogeneity among the diagnostic CPGs for IBD and discrepancies among different domains in one specific guideline. Potential improvements were identified in the fields of stakeholder involvement, rigour of development and applicability. By further analysing the heterogeneity of the recommendations and evidence in 5 UC-CPGs, we found the following issues: no discussion of diagnosing severe complications of UC, disputed significance of serologic and genetic diagnoses of UC, insufficient attention towards medical histories/physical examinations/differential diagnoses and discrepancy in classification criteria. CONCLUSION: The included diagnostic CPGs for IBD were generally of good quality, but heterogeneity was identified. Addressing these issues will provide useful feedback for the guideline updating process, and it will also benefit current clinical practice and eventually patient outcome.

Appraisal of the diagnostic procedures of acute pancreatitis in the guidelines.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to comprehensively assess the heterogeneity of procedures in the diagnostic guidelines for acute pancreatitis and to identify gaps limiting knowledge in diagnosing this disease. METHODS: A systematic search of a number of databases was performed to determine the guidelines for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis in patients with severe pancreatitis. The guidelines for the diagnosis of severe pancreatitis were evaluated by AGREE II. The Measurement Scale of Rate of Agreement (MSRA) was used to assess the guidelines (2015-2020) and extract evidence supporting these recommendations for analysis. RESULTS: Seven diagnostic guidelines for acute pancreatitis were included. Only the 2019 WSES Guidelines for the Management of Severe Acute Pancreatitis and the Japanese Guidelines for the Management of Acute Pancreatitis: Japanese Guidelines 2015 had a total score of more than 60%, which is worthy of clinical recommendation. The average scores of the Scope and Purpose domain and the Clarity and Expression domain were the highest at 71.62% and 75.59%, respectively, while the average score of the Applicability area was the lowest at 16.67%. The included guidelines were further analyzed to determine the heterogeneity of the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. The main reasons for the heterogeneity were the citation of low-quality evidence, the presence of far too many indicators for the classification of acute pancreatitis, unclear depictions of the standard, and poorly comprehensive recommendations for the diagnosis of the aetiology in the primary diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, the severity classification, the aetiological diagnosis, and the diagnosis of comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of different diagnostic guidelines for severe pancreatitis is uneven. The recommendations are largely based on low-quality evidence, and the guidelines still have much room for improvement to reach a high level of quality. The diagnostic procedures for acute pancreatitis vary widely in different guidelines. There are large differences between them, and resolving the abovementioned reasons would be a very wise choice for guideline developers to revise and upgrade the guidelines in the future.

Evaluation of guidelines for the management of perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease.

INTRODUCTION: The occurrence of perineal fistula is a significant evesnt in the evolution of Crohn's disease. Approximately 21% to 23% of patients develop perineal fistula at least once in their lifetime, approximately 30% of patients have cases of recurrence, and the refractory and recurrent perineal lesions of Crohn's disease impose a great economic burden on patients. The main purpose of this review was to investigate the quality of guidelines for perineal fistula in Crohn's disease. AREA COVERED: Relevant websites and databases were systematically searched to identify and select clinical guidelines related to perineal fistulas in Crohn's disease. Four independent reviewers assessed the eligible guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) and used intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) to measure the agreement among the guideline reviewers. CONCLUSION: There is much room for improvement in the quality of guidelines for the management of perineal fistulas in Crohn's disease. The recommendations and evidence for guidelines for the management of perineal fistulas in Crohn's disease are quite heterogeneous, and guideline-developers would be well advised to address the above issues during future guideline development.

Heterogeneity of nutrition care procedures in nutrition guidelines for cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to systematically assess the nutrition care procedures in nutrition guidelines for cancer patients and identify gaps limiting evidence-based practise. METHODS: A systematic search of databases and websites was conducted to identify nutrition guidelines for cancer patients. The quality of the eligible guidelines was evaluated by using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II). The Measurement Scale of Rate of Agreement (MSRA) was used to assess the scientific agreement of formulated recommendations for nutrition care procedures in the guidelines (2017-2019), and evidence supporting these recommendations was extracted and analysed. RESULTS: Seventeen nutrition guidelines for cancer patients were identified. Only European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) and Australian guidelines have a total quality score of more than 60%, which is worthy of clinical recommendation. Twelve guidelines (2017-2019) were included to further analyse the heterogeneity and causes of nutrition care procedures, and we found that the content and tools of nutrition screening and assessment, the application of immune nutrients, and the selection of nutritional support pathways were heterogeneous. The main reasons for the heterogeneity of nutrition care procedures were insufficient attention to nutrition risk screening, differences in recommendations for nutrition assessment, immune nutrients and nutritional support, unreasonable citation of screening and assessment evidence, preference of developers, and lack of evidence of high-quality research on energy and nitrogen demand. In addition, the fairness and propensity of the guidelines for the selection of evidence for different cancer patients are also potential reasons for the heterogeneity of nutritional care procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of the nutrition guidelines for cancer patients was highly variable. The nutrition care procedures were heterogeneous among the different guidelines in the last 3 years. Specific improvement of the factors leading to the heterogeneity of nutrition care procedures will be a reasonable and effective way for developers to upgrade the nutrition care procedures in the guidelines for cancer patients.