Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 38(6): 393-400, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19700533

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of JPEG quality factors 100, 80 and 60 on the reproducibility of identification of cephalometric points on images of lateral cephalograms, compared with the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format. METHODS: The sample was composed of 30 images of digital lateral cephalograms obtained from 30 individuals (15 males and 15 females) on a phosphor plate system in DICOM format. The images were converted to JPEG with quality factors 100, 80 and 60 with the aid of software, adding up to 90 images. The 120 images (DICOM, JPEG 100, 80 and 60) were blinded and 12 cephalometric points were identified on each image by three calibrated orthodontists, using the x-y coordinate system, on a cephalometric software. RESULTS: The results revealed that identification of cephalometric points was highly reproducible, except for the point Orbitale (Or) on the x-axis. The different file formats did not present a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: JPEG images of lateral cephalograms with quality factors 100, 80 and 60 did not present alterations in the reproducibility of identification of cephalometric points compared with the DICOM format. Good reproducibility was achieved for the 12 points, except for point Or on the x-axis.


Subject(s)
Cephalometry/methods , Data Compression , Radiography, Dental, Digital , Radiology Information Systems , Cephalometry/standards , Female , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...