Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Anaerobe ; 59: 72-75, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31129336

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the titers of neutralizing antibodies in cattle inoculated with multivalent commercial clostridial vaccines containing C. botulinum type C (BoNTC), C. botulinum type D (BoNTD), and C. perfringens epsilon (ETX) toxoids for a period of one year. Cattle (Bos taurus), aged 4-6 months and not previously immunized, were vaccinated under four different protocols at days 0 and 30 and followed over one year. Individual serum titration was performed by a serum neutralization test in mice or in MDCK cells. The number of animals with detectable neutralizing antibodies ranged from 40.6% to 78.1%, but only 12.5% of animals showed neutralizing antibodies against all tested antigens. Neutralizing antibodies were found only until 60 days for ETX, 120 days for BoNTC, and 180 days for BoNTD. The absence of detectable neutralizing antibodies against the three antigens before 360 days, suggests that cattle remained unprotected for a long period before the recommended booster vaccination.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Toxins/immunology , Botulinum Toxins/immunology , Immunity, Humoral , Toxoids/immunology , Animals , Antitoxins/blood , Cattle , Dogs , Madin Darby Canine Kidney Cells , Mice , Neutralization Tests , Time Factors , Toxoids/administration & dosage
2.
Anaerobe ; 54: 19-22, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30076896

ABSTRACT

Rabbits and guinea pigs are used in the official control and validation of clostridial vaccines, but it is unknown whether the antitoxin titers obtained in these animals corroborate with the humoral response in bovine. The objective of the study was to compare the humoral antibody response of guinea pig and rabbits to those obtained in cattle vaccinated with a commercial vaccine containing Clostridium perfringens epsilon and beta, and Clostridium botulinum types C and D toxoids. This study revealed the same level of humoral response in rabbits and cattle for all four toxoids tested, including C. botulinum types C and D toxoids. In contrast, the titers of neutralizing antibodies against C. botulinum type C toxin in guinea pigs differed from those obtained in cattle. Thus, the present work suggests that the potency test for C. botulinum types C in rabbits agrees more with the humoral response in cattle than the potency test in guinea pigs, thereby making it possible to use only rabbits as models in the official control and validations of clostridial vaccines.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bacterial/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Botulinum Toxins/immunology , Clostridium Infections/immunology , Animals , Bacterial Vaccines/administration & dosage , Bacterial Vaccines/immunology , Botulinum Toxins/administration & dosage , Botulinum Toxins/genetics , Cattle , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Clostridium Infections/prevention & control , Clostridium botulinum/genetics , Clostridium botulinum/immunology , Clostridium perfringens/immunology , Guinea Pigs , Humans , Immunity, Humoral , Rabbits , Vaccination
3.
Braz J Microbiol ; 44(1): 133-7, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24159295

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to detect C. difficile A/B toxins and to isolate strains of C. perfringens and C. difficile from diarrheic and non-diarrheic dogs in Brazil. Stool samples were collected from 57 dogs, 35 of which were apparently healthy, and 22 of which were diarrheic. C. difficile A/B toxins were detected by ELISA, and C. perfringens and C. difficile were identified by multiplex PCR. C. difficile A/B toxins were detected in 21 samples (36.8%). Of these, 16 (76.2%) were from diarrheic dogs, and five (23.8%) were from non-diarrheic dogs. Twelve C. difficile strains (21.1%) were isolated, of which ten were A(+)B(+) and two were A(-)B(-). All non-toxigenic strains were isolated from non-diarrheic animals. The binary toxin gene cdtB was found in one strain, which was A(+)B(+) and was derived from a non-diarrheic dog. C. perfringens strains were isolated from 40 samples (70.2%). Of these, 18 (45%) were from the diarrheic group, and 22 (55%) belonged to the non-diarrheic group. All isolates were classified as C. perfringens type A and there was an association between the detection of the cpe gene and the presence of diarrhea. Interestingly, ten strains (25%) were positive for the presence of the cpb2 gene. The high rate of detection of the A/B toxins in non-diarrheic dogs suggests the occurrence of subclinical disease in dogs or carriage of its toxins without disease. More studies are needed to elucidate the epidemiology of C. difficile and C. perfringens in dogs and to better our understanding of C. difficile as a zoonotic agent. This is the first study to report the binary toxin gene in C. difficile strains isolated from dogs in Brazil.

4.
Braz. j. microbiol ; 44(1): 133-137, 2013. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-676895

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to detect C. difficileA/B toxins and to isolate strains of C. perfringensand C. difficile from diarrheic and non-diarrheic dogs in Brazil. Stool samples were collected from 57 dogs, 35 of which were apparently healthy, and 22 of which were diarrheic. C. difficileA/B toxins were detected by ELISA, and C. perfringensand C. difficilewere identified by multiplex PCR. C. difficileA/B toxins were detected in 21 samples (36.8%). Of these, 16 (76.2%) were from diarrheic dogs, and five (23.8%) were from non-diarrheic dogs. Twelve C. difficile strains (21.1%) were isolated, of which ten were A+B+and two were A-B-. All non-toxigenic strains were isolated from non-diarrheic animals. The binary toxin gene cdtBwas found in one strain, which was A+B+and was derived from a non-diarrheic dog. C. perfringensstrains were isolated from 40 samples (70.2%). Of these, 18 (45%) were from the diarrheic group, and 22 (55%) belonged to the non-diarrheic group. All isolates were classified as C. perfringenstype A and there was an association between the detection of the cpegene and the presence of diarrhea. Interestingly, ten strains (25%) were positive for the presence of the cpb2gene. The high rate of detection of the A/B toxins in non-diarrheic dogs suggests the occurrence of subclinical disease in dogs or carriage of its toxins without disease. More studies are needed to elucidate the epidemiology of C. difficileand C. perfringensin dogs and to better our understanding of C. difficileas a zoonotic agent. This is the first study to report the binary toxin gene in C. difficilestrains isolated from dogs in Brazil.


Subject(s)
Animals , Dogs , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Clostridium perfringens , Clostridioides difficile/genetics , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Diarrhea/genetics , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous , Fecal Impaction/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Bacterial Toxins/genetics , Bacterial Toxins/isolation & purification , Diagnosis , Immunoassay , Methods , Spores, Bacterial , Virulence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...